PDA

View Full Version : Lavar Arrington or Julian Peterson



dominizzo
01-17-2006, 04:34 AM
If you had a choice who would u take to playfor Miami

ID love to Say Arrington i think talent wise hes better than Peterson but hes a head case!!!!!!

So the obvious choice would be peterson

finfansince72
01-17-2006, 04:41 AM
Are you kidding? Arrington is an idiot and a cancer, Peterson in a heartbeat. I think Peterson is a better player also.

Motion
01-17-2006, 04:51 AM
Living in MD I hear all about Arrington and his childish behavior, I'll take Peterson if I had to take either.

Alex44
01-17-2006, 06:16 AM
Both are amazing athletes

Id take Arrington though, I think he has more talent and he isnt half as bad as he seems with his attitude, certain things have just slipped he isnt a bad choice

Either is a cant miss though, *Unless they get injured*

dol_fan_81
01-17-2006, 06:34 AM
i'd rather have Lavar arrington because we need a new OLB. they are both breat though

Sikk Caden
01-17-2006, 02:07 PM
Arrington If Saban can turn him around...in which I think I can. Id streak around the neighborhood if we got either of them though

Basileus777
01-17-2006, 04:12 PM
Arrington has the bigger upside, but IMO Peterson would be the better choice. Saban could possibly handle him but its not like Gibbs and Gregg Williams are soft undisciplined coaches either.

SCall13
01-17-2006, 04:22 PM
Peterson without blinking.

UltraDol-Fan
01-17-2006, 05:45 PM
Peterson, Lavar looks like he doesn't care about his assignment on defense. He just runs after the ball.

SMadison29
01-17-2006, 07:35 PM
They're two different type of LBs for the 3-4 system. LaVar is a pass rushing LB & Peterson is a coverage LB. So the question is what do we need more? Since we have Taylor moving back to the blitzing backer in the 3-4 we don't really need LaVar. We did, however, have trouble covering TEs later in the year, Gates & Jolley both had 100+ yards, so I'd say Peterson is our guy. Plus when he does blitz he can't be any worse than Seau at it.

HysterikiLL
01-17-2006, 07:59 PM
I'll take them both, please.

Dors156
01-17-2006, 09:40 PM
Living in MD I hear all about Arrington and his childish behavior, I'll take Peterson if I had to take either.

same here that is all you hear is how he lacks discipline

TotoreMexico
01-17-2006, 10:34 PM
I choose Peterson

amir7
01-18-2006, 05:26 PM
peterson would be my choice but arrington could be alot better with proper coaching, but right now, its peterson

NawlinsBucFan
01-18-2006, 05:40 PM
Peterson, Lavar looks like he doesn't care about his assignment on defense. He just runs after the ball.

BINGO!!! Arrington has a descent amount of tackles, but get's caught out of position way to often, and can get absolutely KILLED with play-action and delays.

Simmsm88
01-21-2006, 02:31 AM
I live right by D.C. in fact I went to two redskins games.

Arrington is not really a headcase or cancer, that stuff was just blown up by the media. He pretty much bleeds burgundy & gold, so I wouldn't be surprised if he restructures his contract to stay in washington. He also seems to very out of shape this season, added weight and lost a lot of his quickness and speed. I guess that was because of the surgery he had.

DolphinDevil28
01-21-2006, 02:36 AM
AP Baby.