PDA

View Full Version : Nick mangold in rnd 2



jtsacksyou
02-28-2006, 02:58 PM
will nick mangold be there in the 2nd when we pick? If we could get him in the second and a good tackle in the 1st our oline would be a lot better.

Motion
02-28-2006, 02:59 PM
Doubtful IMO.

I see him as a late 1st - very early 2nd.

playmaker1
02-28-2006, 03:01 PM
I doubt it, but if he is there I sure hope we can pull the triger

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:22 PM
There is a chance he could slip alittle bit. How does everyone feel about Greg Eslinger tho? He would be there in the Second and might be in the third. Mangold could be there in the second , But thats a big maybe!

Motion
02-28-2006, 03:24 PM
There is a chance he could slip alittle bit. How does everyone feel about Greg Eslinger tho? He would be there in the Second and might be in the third. Mangold could be there in the second , But thats a big maybe!

Eslinger is to small IMO.

Alex44
02-28-2006, 03:26 PM
will nick mangold be there in the 2nd when we pick? If we could get him in the second and a good tackle in the 1st our oline would be a lot better.

You wanna go O-line rounds one and two :eek:

what about all the other holes we need to fill

Anyway, I dont think he will be there but never count it out, this draft has a lot of depth and guys that could go ahead of him

Danny
02-28-2006, 03:48 PM
First I'm hoping for Bentley but if we don't get him I'd love to get Mangold but he'll be gone late 1st or early 2nd....I don't like Eslinger for us and I can't see us going o-line with our top 2 picks either but I can see us going defence with our top 2 picks....Lawson at 16 and maybe DB in the 2nd....Watson is also posible as is Carpenter if Lawson's gone.

Ozzy rules!!

Canadi-Phin
02-28-2006, 03:49 PM
I thought about this last night. It would be different for us to do but then the Oline would be set for sometime. Say Justice and Carey at Tackle, Hadnot and James at Guard and Manigold at Center. Sounds pretty good to me. Though Hadnot is a pretty good center and doesn't seem to have the attention span to not jump before the snap.

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:50 PM
You wanna go O-line rounds one and two :eek:

what about all the other holes we need to fill

Anyway, I dont think he will be there but never count it out, this draft has a lot of depth and guys that could go ahead of him



Yeah I would draft Justice and Mangold with our first two picks cause Oline is our biggest problem at the moment. You get that line going and thats gunna help Ronnie and the passing game. No need to have a QB if you gunna get him hurt.

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:52 PM
First I'm hoping for Bentley but if we don't get him I'd love to get Mangold but he'll be gone late 1st or early 2nd....I don't like Eslinger for us and I can't see us going o-line with our top 2 picks either but I can see us going defence with our top 2 picks....Lawson at 16 and maybe DB in the 2nd....Watson is also posible as is Carpenter if Lawson's gone.

Ozzy rules!!


Bentley is gunna cost over 5 mil a year and I don't wanna pay that for a Center. Thats too much for him. I know he is one of the best and he is still young.

Motion
02-28-2006, 03:52 PM
Yeah I would draft Justice and Mangold with our first two picks cause Oline is our biggest problem at the moment. You get that line going and thats gunna help Ronnie and the passing game. No need to have a QB if you gunna get him hurt.

Hmmmm.... I agree its a need but biggest problem? I'd definitely put it behind QB and secondary, especially if we lose Madison.

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:53 PM
Eslinger is to small IMO.



Yeah, But so is Mike degory and you like picking him.


what is IMO?

Motion
02-28-2006, 03:55 PM
Yeah, But so is Mike degory and you like picking him.


what is IMO?

I think he's a good center, but probably wouldn't fit our system either.

In My Opinion

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:55 PM
Hmmmm.... I agree its a need but biggest problem? I'd definitely put it behind QB and secondary, especially if we lose Madison.


QB is a Big problem I am just assuming we are gunna get a QB thru free agency. I actually think Madison is gunna stay after he restructures his contract. Besides that Will Poole will be healthy and the would put Daniels as a 3rd DB so its already lookinng better.

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 03:56 PM
I think he's a good center, but probably wouldn't fit our system either.

In My Opinion


Thank you. I should have know that. :D

Motion
02-28-2006, 03:57 PM
QB is a Big problem I am just assuming we are gunna get a QB thru free agency. I actually think Madison is gunna stay after he restructures his contract. Besides that Will Poole will be healthy and the would put Daniels as a 3rd DB so its already lookinng better.

I wouldn't be handing the starting job to Poole just yet. I really like the guy but Daniels has been playing in the system for a couple years now.

dolfan72734me
02-28-2006, 03:58 PM
Yeah, But so is Mike degory and you like picking him.


what is IMO?
In My Opinion
EDIT: oops, beat me too it.

Skeet84
02-28-2006, 04:14 PM
I wouldn't be handing the starting job to Poole just yet. I really like the guy but Daniels has been playing in the system for a couple years now.


Yeah, But Poole would have been a starter last year and Daniels would be a really good 3rd DB. However I would not be mad if Daniels started and Poole was the thrid. Gunna be alot better than Howard.

Motion
02-28-2006, 04:19 PM
Yeah, But Poole would have been a starter last year and Daniels would be a really good 3rd DB. However I would not be mad if Daniels started and Poole was the thrid. Gunna be alot better than Howard.

No doubt

musphinzfan
02-28-2006, 04:24 PM
Mangold might have solidified himself as a 1st....Alot of centers in this draft,very deep and if Miami takes 1 it will be in the 3rd..Unless we trade down or someone slips through the cracks.