PDA

View Full Version : Breaking News on Reggie Bush



alopez34
04-23-2006, 05:02 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AjY74azLaqb6RLl2R0pUxd05nYcB?slug=cr-bush042306&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

talks about Bush and how his family recieved an illega home. Could spell disaster for USC and Bush

Amars
04-23-2006, 05:06 PM
I wonder what would the NCAA will do?

What did they do to chris webber?

305TillIDie
04-23-2006, 05:19 PM
I wonder what would the NCAA will do?

What did they do to chris webber?uh oh..ncaa may do something..dont know what they going to do..but oh man..reggie may be in trouble

jimthefin
04-23-2006, 05:33 PM
Reggie is in no trouble at all.

USC may be in trouble with the NCAA but nothing will happen to Bush.

Using a house provided by an agent/sleazeball is against NCAA rules but it isn't ILLEGAL.

Troysif
04-23-2006, 05:37 PM
Yea i read this, this morning and i was gonna post it, but i didnt

Dors156
04-23-2006, 06:37 PM
i doubt he will run into trouble

unifiedtheory
04-23-2006, 07:39 PM
This is a topic in the VIP room and KB brought up a very good point.

USC makes WAY too much money for the NCAA to do anything heavy duty to them. If it was Boise State or something they'd lose some scholarships and a bowl game but unless it is something REALLY major the NCAA won't do anything to USC.

Pennington's Rocket Arm
04-23-2006, 07:49 PM
yeah, nothing will happen to bush at all. most likely not even USC. really i think this story is based on timing more than anything.

Boomer
04-23-2006, 07:51 PM
Nothing will happen to Bush at all.

Joey 22
04-23-2006, 07:58 PM
Well it will certainly stain Bushs rep. and it wasnt USC who literally bribed Bush, it was a manager trying to get Bush to be his client, whenever he decided to come out, actually USC is probably a victim since such agent could have forced Bush to come out early.

fishfan34
04-23-2006, 11:30 PM
Nothing will happen to Bush, and you're right about the $$ that USC brings the NCAA so they might not rip scholarships, but, they might not have a choice but to disqualify USC in the games that Bush played in, therefore forfeiting those game. This will be very interesting to keep an eye on.

dlockz
04-23-2006, 11:44 PM
This wil have no affect at all on Bush much like any similar situation has in the past. Bush is the best player in the draft and no team really cares about this story except USC.

Pennington's Rocket Arm
04-23-2006, 11:45 PM
yeah, nothing will happen to bush at all.

Nothing will happen to Bush at all.
:hmmm:

bullseyeguy
04-24-2006, 12:37 AM
Im sure nothing will happen to bush at all.

maddendude
04-24-2006, 12:43 AM
wiping out the records of argueably the greatest college football team ever...thats interesting. They did it to one of the best basketball teams ever..i think.

SEAFinFan
04-24-2006, 03:58 AM
Why do people think USC will not get punished if there was any school involvement? They punished the most dominant College Football program (Alabama) some years ago for about 3 years of bowl-ineligability. So why would it not happen to USC??

MiamiMan147
04-24-2006, 09:48 AM
Alabama dominant? This isn't the 1970's.

And right now the NCAA has as much ability to punish Reggie Bush as my high school Math teacher has the ability to send me to detention.

SEAFinFan
04-24-2006, 12:38 PM
Alabama dominant? This isn't the 1970's.

And right now the NCAA has as much ability to punish Reggie Bush as my high school Math teacher has the ability to send me to detention.

Alabama has the most National Titles out of every Division 1 school so, yes they would be dominant. That's like saying the 72 Dolphins shouldn't be considered the most dominant team ever (which they are) because it's not the 70's.

MiamiMan147
04-24-2006, 01:26 PM
They punished the most dominant College Football program (Alabama) some years ago for about 3 years of bowl-ineligability

They were not a dominant team when they were punished, and hadn't been for 20 years.

Avigatorx
04-24-2006, 01:43 PM
Nothing will happen to Bush at all.


He could lose his heisman.

burger13
04-24-2006, 02:42 PM
He could lose his heisman.

This is probably a weird question.....but they couldn't take back his trophy, right?? I know that they could refuse to recognize him any more....and list the award as vacant for '05....but they couldn't actually repossess the trophy I don't think. They gave it to him....so it's his property now. I wonder how that would work........

just one of the many stupid things that goes through my mind. :goof:

Avigatorx
04-24-2006, 04:06 PM
This is probably a weird question.....but they couldn't take back his trophy, right?? I know that they could refuse to recognize him any more....and list the award as vacant for '05....but they couldn't actually repossess the trophy I don't think. They gave it to him....so it's his property now. I wonder how that would work........

just one of the many stupid things that goes through my mind. :goof:

I dont see why not. If he was ineligible to receive the trophy in the first place, why not just take it away?

If USC's record is stripped, how can bush have any stats for the '05 season? (technically speaking).

They could list it as vacant or award it to the second place finisher.

I dont think its likely, but its possible.

Of course none of this means bush is any less of an athlete than he was before the news hit. He will still make a boatload of money in the NFL.

bullseyeguy
04-24-2006, 04:08 PM
If they were going to take the trophy, he should just sell it..