PDA

View Full Version : ok seriously if we get the #1 pick?



nolefin
10-29-2006, 11:02 PM
ok i no there has been jokes about the #1 pick but if we end up with it who would you pick? no trades! honestly who would take #1 JUST 1 NAME!!!!


MY PICK, BRADY QUINN, you never ever pass up a franchise qb cpepp is 30

tucker
10-29-2006, 11:13 PM
can we quit with these repetitive threads please..my god

finsrule84
10-29-2006, 11:16 PM
IF Culpepper doesn't recover this season, then seriously take a look at Quinn. If not, then Calvin Johnson FTW!

MosesRodriguez
10-29-2006, 11:16 PM
Calvin Johnson

Motion
10-29-2006, 11:20 PM
Cj

Dolfansal
10-29-2006, 11:25 PM
You can't go receiver #1

A receiver doesn't get enough touches to warrant a #1 overall pick and #1 overall cash.

QB or take the best trade out there. The problem is that teams are expecting a monster deal or nothing.

Would Houston had been better off moving back a few spots and picking up a 2nd? It might not have "added up but 2 starters for 1 is a good deal.

gish
10-29-2006, 11:36 PM
Stephen Colbert

DonShula84
10-29-2006, 11:36 PM
You can't go receiver #1

A receiver doesn't get enough touches to warrant a #1 overall pick and #1 overall cash.

QB or take the best trade out there. The problem is that teams are expecting a monster deal or nothing.

Would Houston had been better off moving back a few spots and picking up a 2nd? It might not have "added up but 2 starters for 1 is a good deal.

Trading down is a great idea, it takes a team to want to move up though and is willing to give us value for the pick. It's easier said then done.

rob19
10-29-2006, 11:54 PM
Having the first pick would really suck because if you cant trade down your stuck with a tremendous salary for a player you dont necessarily want or could get a little later on in the draft. I know CJ is good but it be hard for be to take a reciever with the first pick, joe thomas might be a little easier to swallow.

mmikel30
10-30-2006, 12:34 AM
You can't go receiver #1

A receiver doesn't get enough touches to warrant a #1 overall pick and #1 overall cash.

QB or take the best trade out there. The problem is that teams are expecting a monster deal or nothing.

Would Houston had been better off moving back a few spots and picking up a 2nd? It might not have "added up but 2 starters for 1 is a good deal.finally someone who has a clue thank you

Miamifin23
10-30-2006, 12:43 AM
Well unless we think Culpepper can still come back and play at a high level, why wouldn't we draft Quinn? We would be stupid to not draft him at #1. I know no one likes to hear it when we have a past pro bowl QB and we gave up a 2nd round pick for, but at some point you have to eat your losses. If we stay with Culpepper for the future, then I say either Joe Thomas or Calvin Johnson. I'm hoping we have can get in the 5-8 range so we're not stuck with a huge salary on a player that may not pan out.

elite14eva
10-30-2006, 12:44 AM
try to trade down.

postermaster
10-30-2006, 12:56 AM
Trade the #1 overall to Oakland for the #3 or #4 overall + Randy Moss and draft a stud OL

zackmandude63
10-30-2006, 06:03 AM
imagine the #1 and chambers to oakland for #3 or #4 and moss and we draft ginn or cj? what a receiving tandem THAT would be!

DonShula84
10-30-2006, 06:13 AM
imagine the #1 and chambers to oakland for #3 or #4 and moss and we draft ginn or cj? what a receiving tandem THAT would be!

Wow, that'd be a horrible horrible trade.

Silverphin
10-30-2006, 06:18 AM
I'd take LaRon Landry or a DE/OLB that is worth going number one.

mariocarciero
10-30-2006, 08:05 AM
can we quit with these repetitive threads please..my god

Give the guy a break. Maybe he missed the other threads.

mariocarciero
10-30-2006, 08:07 AM
Trade the #1 overall to Oakland for the #3 or #4 overall + Randy Moss and draft a stud OL

And then give me season tickets for next year for free. :shakeno:

SQuinn17
10-30-2006, 10:04 AM
You can't go receiver #1

A receiver doesn't get enough touches to warrant a #1 overall pick and #1 overall cash.

QB or take the best trade out there. The problem is that teams are expecting a monster deal or nothing.

Would Houston had been better off moving back a few spots and picking up a 2nd? It might not have "added up but 2 starters for 1 is a good deal.
not if u pass on a once in a lifetime player its not a good deal.

FinFan72
10-30-2006, 10:08 AM
You can't go receiver #1

A receiver doesn't get enough touches to warrant a #1 overall pick and #1 overall cash.

QB or take the best trade out there. The problem is that teams are expecting a monster deal or nothing.

Would Houston had been better off moving back a few spots and picking up a 2nd? It might not have "added up but 2 starters for 1 is a good deal.
i agree 100%

Majpain
10-30-2006, 10:13 AM
If we got the first I have no doubt we get Quinn only to trade him down and get future picks.

Bjorn
10-30-2006, 11:48 AM
If we get the first pick we better trade with the lions and get the 2nd or 3rd pick and a first for '08 and maybe a third for '07 and still draft Calvin Johnson. That would be an ideal situation IMO.

Pennington's Rocket Arm
10-30-2006, 11:52 AM
If we get the first pick we better trade with the lions and get the 2nd or 3rd pick and a first for '08 and maybe a third for '07 and still draft Calvin Johnson. That would be an ideal situation IMO.
not an ideal situation for detroit, which is why it would never happen.

JJW1339
10-30-2006, 01:01 PM
Trade down and get as many picks as you can. This team has a lot of needs, they are not just 1 or 2 players away from being a good team, they are about 10 players away!