PDA

View Full Version : michael huff



King Felix
11-19-2006, 10:31 PM
he doesnt seem to be doing very good......no int's so far...intresting

Vertical Limit
11-19-2006, 10:34 PM
Well, what do you expect a rookie to do with terrible coaching? Michael Huff is in for a long career. I feel sorry for him, but untill he gets away from Oakland, he won't be nothing. I thought Michael Huff had potential to be an Ed Reed type of player, but not in Oakland.

Michael Huff would have been better off in Detroit. Oakland is way too embarrasing.

finfansince72
11-19-2006, 11:25 PM
Well, what do you expect a rookie to do with terrible coaching? Michael Huff is in for a long career. I feel sorry for him, but untill he gets away from Oakland, he won't be nothing. I thought Michael Huff had potential to be an Ed Reed type of player, but not in Oakland.

Michael Huff would have been better off in Detroit. Oakland is way too embarrasing.

The Raiders D has been good this year, the D coaching isnt a problem.

dominizzo
11-20-2006, 12:51 AM
Huff is playing well!! Hes having a good year!! I think hes better than jason Allen

Phinz4Life
11-21-2006, 07:13 PM
Huff is playing well!! Hes having a good year!! I think hes better than jason Allen

Allen has had a fraction of the playing time as Huff.

L.T.21
11-21-2006, 07:23 PM
Huff is a HORRIBLE TACKLER- HORRIBLE!

PhinFan0202
11-21-2006, 07:25 PM
Huff is playing well!! Hes having a good year!! I think hes better than jason Allen

Jason Allen has not seen the field nearly as much.

Silverphin
11-21-2006, 07:27 PM
Jason Allen has not seen the field nearly as much.

And he still has more interceptions than Huff.

HysterikiLL
11-21-2006, 07:29 PM
^Breaking news: Talent is not defined as 'the amount of interceptions a guy has'. Huff has had a good year and will be a very very good player, despite being part of the most hideous franchise in sports.

L.T.21
11-21-2006, 07:47 PM
^Breaking news: Talent is not defined as 'the amount of interceptions a guy has'. Huff has had a good year and will be a very very good player, despite being part of the most hideous franchise in sports.

But can be defined and observed as having

Horrible angles when tackling

Tackling way too high

Resists in changing his tackling style (not to Huff, this is not high school and Texas anymore)

Has been caught out of position plenty of times

But he is a rookie so its early.

ch19079
11-22-2006, 10:50 AM
hes a rookie. he was drafted because he has the natural ability to be a beast. it may take him a few years to develop his skills, but he has the potental to be a polumalu or reed type player.

that said, i have to point out how well Whitner has played for us (excluding the last game agenst the texans :mad: ). :D

L.T.21
11-22-2006, 11:10 AM
hes a rookie. he was drafted because he has the natural ability to be a beast. it may take him a few years to develop his skills, but he has the potental to be a polumalu or reed type player.

that said, i have to point out how well Whitner has played for us (excluding the last game agenst the texans :mad: ). :D

The bills draft made me scratch my head.

Pennington's Rocket Arm
11-22-2006, 11:35 AM
he'll be fine. rookie safeties rarely excel.

Brown42000
11-25-2006, 06:42 PM
He will be fine you can't always judge a rookie in his first year.

Aqua4Ever04
11-26-2006, 12:16 AM
^Breaking news: Talent is not defined as 'the amount of interceptions a guy has'. Huff has had a good year and will be a very very good player, despite being part of the most hideous franchise in sports.

I was going to say the same thing. Defensive backs shouldn't be measured on the number of INTs but rather how well they cover recievers. Look at yards and catches allowed if you want to rate a DB.

Silverphin
11-26-2006, 12:22 AM
^Breaking news: Talent is not defined as 'the amount of interceptions a guy has'. Huff has had a good year and will be a very very good player, despite being part of the most hideous franchise in sports.

I know. I know.

ChambersWI
11-26-2006, 01:19 AM
Huff is actually not having a good year according to Raider fans I've talked to.

They say his mistakes have been covered up because of the play of the other 3 starters in the secondary, and the play of Howard and MOrrison at LB.