PDA

View Full Version : Banks Mock 5.0 out (April 10)



wpgfishfan
04-10-2007, 05:28 PM
Here it is

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/don_banks/04/10/mock.draft5.part1/index.html

Has us taking Branch

Has Okoye going #6
Has Staley going #20
Has Blalock going #29

ohiobryan
04-10-2007, 05:34 PM
quinn will be a fin!

CitizenSnips
04-10-2007, 05:40 PM
that seems to be one of the most logical mock drafts i've seen.

I'll even go one better,

#33, Oakland Raiders. C, USC, Ryan Kalil.

FanMarino
04-10-2007, 05:40 PM
Im not going to shout from the rooftops if we take Branch. He may be a solid DT and with our aging DT's i suppose its a need but with our pick so high this yr i would be a little disappointed. I'd rather get Landry to be honest or even Hall to boost our defensive backfield.

Agent51
04-10-2007, 05:46 PM
• The Raiders are in love with the idea of drafting Georgia Tech receiver Calvin Johnson, but they haven't solved the dilemma of how he would throw himself the ball.

:lol: That's the best part of the article.

The worst is us taking Branch. I'm all set with an out of shape and lazy DT with the #9 overall pick. :shakeno:

SQuinn17
04-10-2007, 06:40 PM
:lol: That's the best part of the article.

The worst is us taking Branch. I'm all set with an out of shape and lazy DT with the #9 overall pick. :shakeno:
yah right that guy is an animal

Hoot {MWB}
04-10-2007, 08:07 PM
If we take Branch that would suck. I'm not impressed with him. There are about 20 other guys I would take before Alan.

nighttrain76
04-10-2007, 08:28 PM
quinn will be a fin!

:shakeno: :shakeno: :shakeno:

PJack
04-10-2007, 08:35 PM
The worst is us taking Branch. I'm all set with an out of shape and lazy DT with the #9 overall pick. :shakeno:

Agreed. Workouts have sucked. His motor and heart questioned. I would not be happy with him at 9. At least take a guy that will leave his heart on the field.

NJPHIN34
04-10-2007, 09:18 PM
that seems to be one of the most logical mock drafts i've seen.

I'll even go one better,

#33, Oakland Raiders. C, USC, Ryan Kalil.

I don't think the Raiders will go for a center at that point. I know they drafted Jake Grove pretty early about 2 years ago. Not sure how he's doing though.


Also, this mock might not be too bad because it would give us a great opportunity to trade down. He has Peterson going to the Texans at 10. So we would be a logical spot to trade to if people want Peterson. At the very least we could try to get a pick out of the Texans to swap spots. Much like the Vivkings did to us a few years back for Carey.

DC8
04-10-2007, 09:25 PM
Boy, I know that we don't need any help at RB whatsoever but I would screech like a school girl if we got Peterson at #9. The best teams in this league dont draft by need but by BPA and don't forget that that was exactly the case when Randy Mueller drafted RB Deuce McAllister when they already had Ricky in NO. What did the Saints end up getting out of this? Two future first round picks.:wink: If anything, it would give us an outstanding shot at trading down if Peterson was still on the board.

maverick50
04-10-2007, 09:36 PM
if it is not quinn , oline or patrick willis i will puke.:shakeno: :shakeno: :shakeno:

MarinoForPres
04-10-2007, 10:29 PM
pretty realistic id say but i dont think we take branch.