PDA

View Full Version : Jets More Verticle Passing Game



K-Rob
07-30-2003, 02:27 PM
Just figured I'd post this to see if the Jets live up to their talk. This is from the following ESPN article: http://espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp03/columns/pasquarelli_len/1584465.html.


"You don't want to be a team that just throws the ball deep one or two times a game. You want to do it six or seven times. I'm talking about plays where we drop back and where the wide receiver says to the cornerback, 'Hey, I'm just running right by you.' That's what I'm talking about."

Yeah....okay! I'd like to see them try this against the Fins defense.

FFiB
07-30-2003, 02:30 PM
Originally posted by K-Rob
Just figured I'd post this to see if the Jets live up to their talk. This is from the following ESPN article: http://espn.go.com/nfl/trainingcamp03/columns/pasquarelli_len/1584465.html.



Yeah....okay! I'd like to see them try this against the Fins defense.

Especially with Chad Pennington who is a master (like Brady) at the dink and dunk...

Dolfan984
07-30-2003, 02:32 PM
Chad Pennington throwing deep?

They'll go back to screen passes and slants by week 2 or 3.

K-Rob
07-30-2003, 02:45 PM
Especially after our week-2 matchup with them.

RUDEbyallMEANS
07-30-2003, 04:26 PM
Pennington throwing deep in Week 2?? Look for Knight and MArion to combine for 2-3 INT's

Barbarian
07-30-2003, 10:33 PM
Penningtons Idea of throwing deep is the 7-10 yard curl. ;)

I hope they try and change it up, because it'll be fun to watch the yets putz around and play away from their few remaining strengths. :D

TigerJ
07-30-2003, 11:34 PM
I agree. Chad Pennington and the deep pass seems like an oxymoron. Drew Bledsoe on the other hand. . .

CHOPS44
08-03-2003, 03:59 PM
that's funny.
i remember chad burning your a$$es on sunday night footbal with a 45 yard BOMB to set up the go ahead field goal.

Dolfan984
08-03-2003, 04:15 PM
Ray Lucas gave you 7 of those points, and couldn't get it done in the fourth quarter. We scored 10 points. You got lucky.

Barbarian
08-03-2003, 05:45 PM
Originally posted by CHOPS44
that's funny.
i remember chad burning your a$$es on sunday night footbal with a 45 yard BOMB to set up the go ahead field goal.

Even a blind dog finds a bone every now and then. :lol:

nyrican
08-08-2003, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by Dolfan984
Ray Lucas gave you 7 of those points, and couldn't get it done in the fourth quarter. We scored 10 points. You got lucky.

yea and we got lucky when rick fumbled the football and we got lucky when we held Ricky for less then 100 yards rushing and we have been lucky by beating your team 9 out of ten times.

you get the picture right ...

zach13
08-08-2003, 02:46 PM
Originally posted by nyrican


yea and we got lucky when rick fumbled the football

That wasn't a fumble

RUDEbyallMEANS
08-08-2003, 02:52 PM
Jets got all the help in the world that game and only beat Miami by 3 points!!! LMAO... Refs call off a Chambers TD, they call a Ricky fumble that EVERYONE was baffled about and yet the Jes fans are proud of winning that game.. Refs pinned it with a bow tie for you.. Hold on to it for as long as you can..

nyrican
08-08-2003, 03:52 PM
Originally posted by zachseau13


That wasn't a fumble

then what was it a stumble ??????????????

nyrican
08-08-2003, 03:54 PM
Originally posted by RUDEbyallMEANS
Jets got all the help in the world that game and only beat Miami by 3 points!!! LMAO... Refs call off a Chambers TD, they call a Ricky fumble that EVERYONE was baffled about and yet the Jes fans are proud of winning that game.. Refs pinned it with a bow tie for you.. Hold on to it for as long as you can..

yep whe have been holding it now for a while lets say when was the last time the fins beat the Jets at the Meadowlands ????

1997 ummmmmmmmm

RUDEbyallMEANS
08-08-2003, 04:18 PM
Only Jets Fans (and Bills fans too).. Are proud of beating a team without their starting QB and WR by only 3 points... What happens had Fiedler and Gadsden played?? It's Miami 30 and Jets 3.. All over again.. Jets lose their best WR and now how are they going to move on Miami??

Jets<~~1 TD on Miami in 2 games last year.. That 1 TD was given to Jets by Lucas..

You PROUD Of that??

Dolfan984
08-08-2003, 06:17 PM
You see that replay? Ricky was on his knees, the gets hit with a player on his legs keeping him from moving, he figured the play was over and the ball came out. You can see Ricky putting his hands up to Wanny knowing it was a bad call. The play stood over replay because there was someone blocking the camera, making it so there was no conclusive evidence and the call stood. You got lucky.

We will sweep the Jets this year. They have gotten worse, we have gotten better. Hell, I think the friggen Bills are going to sweep you guys.

TigerJ
08-08-2003, 11:09 PM
RudebyallMeans: "Only Jets Fans (and Bills fans too).. Are proud of beating a team without their starting QB and WR by only 3 points."

Is it only Miami fans who arrogantly predict they will crush the other team even without their starting QB and WR, then immediately jump on their absence as an excuse when they lose?

Last year, I repeatedly said leading up to the first Bills/Fish game that the absence of Fiedler and Chambers could be the deciding factor. That was not a matter of pride. It was reasonable conjecture. When the game was over, I was glad for the win and had no illusions about the fact that Fiedler's and Chambers' presence could well have meant a different result. It was Fin fans who spewed seemingly endless smack about how their absence wouldn't change anything, then cried for days afterward about how things would have been different with their starters. I never argued that point. I simply said then, and repeat now, you can't have your cake and eat it to. If you don't want to get smacked back, don't spew foolish smack in the first place.

CirclingWagons
08-09-2003, 04:07 PM
Originally posted by TigerJ
RudebyallMeans: &quot;Only Jets Fans (and Bills fans too).. Are proud of beating a team without their starting QB and WR by only 3 points.&quot;

Is it only Miami fans who arrogantly predict they will crush the other team even without their starting QB and WR, then immediately jump on their absence as an excuse when they lose?

Last year, I repeatedly said leading up to the first Bills/Fish game that the absence of Fiedler and Chambers could be the deciding factor. That was not a matter of pride. It was reasonable conjecture. When the game was over, I was glad for the win and had no illusions about the fact that Fiedler's and Chambers' presence could well have meant a different result. It was Fin fans who spewed seemingly endless smack about how their absence wouldn't change anything, then cried for days afterward about how things would have been different with their starters. I never argued that point. I simply said then, and repeat now, you can't have your cake and eat it to. If you don't want to get smacked back, don't spew foolish smack in the first place.

i'm sure they'll deny that too tiger:rolleyes: