PDA

View Full Version : Human Like Figure Spotted On Mars



Brown42000
01-25-2008, 09:28 AM
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4182955

IMO if it was some sort of human NASA wouldn't have released the footage.

Celtkin
01-25-2008, 10:33 AM
If you get a chance, view the full sized photo and you'll find the tiny rock in the lower left hand corner. It is a very small rock that has been blown up by bloggers and isolated for effect. ;)

Dolphan7
01-25-2008, 04:46 PM
Looks like Sasquatch found a new planet!

EvilDylan
01-28-2008, 05:08 PM
cool, probably a shadow of a rock though.

Majpain
01-29-2008, 02:56 AM
Its just a rock.

If it was something else like a statue or a Alien then don't you think they would have taken more photos?

NJFINSFAN1
01-29-2008, 09:24 AM
Is it FININTHEMARS???

ch19079
01-29-2008, 09:52 AM
Its no diffrent than taking a picture of a cloud and saying you found the face of god. People see what they want to see.

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 10:18 AM
Its no diffrent than taking a picture of a cloud and saying you found the face of god. People see what they want to see.

Exactly :hi5:

CrunchTime
01-29-2008, 11:47 AM
During the first Mars mission a photo was taken of what appeared to be a crater with a face sculptured on it.

They could never repeat that photo .It was just that angle and with that light.

In the same manner I doubt if they could repeat this photo .Its circumstantial evidence at best IMO

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 02:52 PM
Here's some more from the same picture. Look on the bottom right. There is a rock that looks like a lizard wearing goggles:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 02:53 PM
Here's some more from the same picture. Look on the bottom left. There is a rock that looks like a lizard wearing goggles:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

Hopefully people can see that the human rock on the left is just a tiny rock and not a sculpture of a human.

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 02:59 PM
Here's the face on Mars that Crunch was talking about:

From space:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

Same feature taken from a different angle from space:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

Here is a image created by the Mars orbiter:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060921_mars_images.html

Nappy Roots
01-29-2008, 09:36 PM
Here's some more from the same picture. Look on the bottom left. There is a rock that looks like a lizard wearing goggles:

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif


i dont see the lizard?

NJFINSFAN1
01-29-2008, 09:47 PM
i dont see the lizard?

Good, I thought I was the only one!

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 10:24 PM
i dont see the lizard?

Darn it...sorry guys. Bottom right.

Sethdaddy8
01-29-2008, 11:15 PM
that rock certainly is NOT "walking"

Celtkin
01-29-2008, 11:33 PM
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/patterson_bigfoot-1.jpghttp://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/manonmars1-1.jpg

Dolphan7
01-29-2008, 11:44 PM
:pictures:

Mike13
01-30-2008, 11:45 AM
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/patterson_bigfoot-1.jpghttp://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/manonmars1-1.jpg
:sidelol:

emeraldfin
01-30-2008, 12:33 PM
Think in the mist of all this people have forgotten that Mars cant support life on its surface.

Underground maybe

Celtkin
01-30-2008, 05:09 PM
Think in the mist of all this people have forgotten that Mars cant support life on its surface.

Underground maybe

I don't know that you can say that for sure.

Dolphan7
01-30-2008, 05:21 PM
Mars cannot support life, anywhere above or under ground. Every experiment, and some very extensive and conclusive (amazing we did that from so far away) ones to boot ......turned up zero.

Celtkin
01-30-2008, 05:43 PM
Mars cannot support life, anywhere above or under ground. Every experiment, and some very extensive and conclusive (amazing we did that from so far away) ones to boot ......turned up zero.

Pardon? I can take you to places on the earth where you won't find any life...not even microbial. Would you draw the same conclusion if you performed the minimal experiments that have been performed on Martian soil. We have done squat for experiments on Martian soil for life. I am not sure where you get your information bro but the group I work with has a JPL and NASA grant to develop techniques and technologies to test for life on Mars.

There is no reliable test for life that can be performed from off the planet.

Dolphan7
01-30-2008, 06:00 PM
Pardon? I can take you to places on the earth where you won't find any life...not even microbial. Would you draw the same conclusion if you performed the minimal experiments that have been performed on Martian soil. We have done squat for experiments on Martian soil for life. I am not sure where you get your information bro but the group I work with has a JPL and NASA grant to develop techniques and technologies to test for life on Mars.

There is no reliable test for life that can be performed from off the planet.Every test that we have done produces the same result, nothing. We sent a lander equiped with the capability to perform numerous tests for life and I would hope that we sent the significant tests to be run, which I believe we did, otherwise it seem rather shortsighted.

Now we can keep looking, and in many cases hoping, that with just a few more tests we will find something that proves life can naturally exist in the universe, but how much money are we going to spend to get the same result? If science wants to say "the finish line is just around the "next" corner, that is fine, but I would rather not pay for it. I can think of much better uses for the money we spend looking for life outside our earth.

Pagan
01-30-2008, 06:50 PM
Hmmm...is anyone else catching the irony in this thread? :lol:

Celtkin
01-30-2008, 07:11 PM
Every test that we have done produces the same result, nothing. We sent a lander equiped with the capability to perform numerous tests for life and I would hope that we sent the significant tests to be run, which I believe we did, otherwise it seem rather shortsighted.

Now we can keep looking, and in many cases hoping, that with just a few more tests we will find something that proves life can naturally exist in the universe, but how much money are we going to spend to get the same result? If science wants to say "the finish line is just around the "next" corner, that is fine, but I would rather not pay for it. I can think of much better uses for the money we spend looking for life outside our earth.

One battery of tests were performed in one location and that test inconclusive. In that test, the experiment was attempting to vaporize organic compounds from the soil and test for measurable levels of those compounds. What will be tried next to send up a small robotic vehicle with cuvettes containing respiratory dyes and then inoculate the medium with soil (and known bacteria containing soil as a positive control). If there is life in the soil we test, the respiratory dye will change color.

Here's a good reference if you want the facts about the tests that were performed and what went wrong:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/6/2425?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Viking+mars&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT

Here is an example:

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/picrenderfcgiartid119848blobname14712180-1.jpg

If you are interested in the process, here is one of my lab's publication on the subject:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=119848

Most likely, if life is to be found, it will be found near the poles where frozen water remains.

Here is a place on earth (in Chile) that microbiologist have been unable to find microbial life in. So, you see, just because you don't find life in a dry hot place, doesn't mean you won't find it in Florida or wherever you look next. :hi5:
http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif
Atacama Desert

Dolphan7
01-30-2008, 11:37 PM
One battery of tests were performed in one location and that test inconclusive. In that test, the experiment was attempting to vaporize organic compounds from the soil and test for measurable levels of those compounds. What will be tried next to send up a small robotic vehicle with cuvettes containing respiratory dyes and then inoculate the medium with soil (and known bacteria containing soil as a positive control). If there is life in the soil we test, the respiratory dye will change color.

Here's a good reference if you want the facts about the tests that were performed and what went wrong:

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/6/2425?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Viking+mars&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&resourcetype=HWCIT

Here is an example:

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/01/picrenderfcgiartid119848blobname14712180-1.jpg

If you are interested in the process, here is one of my lab's publication on the subject:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=119848

Most likely, if life is to be found, it will be found near the poles where frozen water remains.

Here is a place on earth (in Chile) that microbiologist have been unable to find microbial life in. So, you see, just because you don't find life in a dry hot place, doesn't mean you won't find it in Florida or wherever you look next. :hi5:
http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif
Atacama DesertI am not unfamiliar with these tests and other research into life outside our earth, and one fact remains: There has been no evidence of any kind that life exists outside earth. None.

Keep looking. Keep hoping. Call me if you find anything.

Celtkin
01-31-2008, 09:31 AM
I am not unfamiliar with these tests and other research into life outside our earth, and one fact remains: There has been no evidence of any kind that life exists outside earth. None.

Keep looking. Keep hoping. Call me if you find anything.

Didn't mean to offend you bro. I was just trying to give you more information about what was actually done and what was planned rather than having you rely on whatever current source you were using.

From your initial statement it seemed that you were indeed unfamiliar the tests and the results.

I can't say if life has or has never existed on Mars but it is the nature of humans to investigate the unknown. That is how we learn and grow as a species and what dragged us out of the dark ages.

Dolphan7
01-31-2008, 02:02 PM
Didn't mean to offend you bro. I was just trying to give you more information about what was actually done and what was planned rather than having you rely on whatever current source you were using.

From your initial statement it seemed that you were indeed unfamiliar the tests and the results.

I can't say if life has or has never existed on Mars but it is the nature of humans to investigate the unknown. That is how we learn and grow as a species and what dragged us out of the dark ages.No offense taken. As I said, I AM familiar (not unfamiliar) with what is going on as I keep tabs on this type of stuff, from many sources. I have an interest in science and discovery and I have a deep respect for all the men and women who put together these experiemnts and projects. It blows my mind that we can even get something to land on Mars, let alone perform lab experiments. So hats off to you and your colleagues.

I just don't think we're going to find anything.

Nappy Roots
01-31-2008, 08:13 PM
Darn it...sorry guys. Bottom right.



lol, i still dont see it...

Celtkin
01-31-2008, 08:55 PM
lol, i still dont see it...

Here you go bro

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

Joker2thief
01-31-2008, 10:28 PM
great thanks
now all i see are goggle wearing lizards and a guy dressed as Bigfoot walking around on Mars
another sleepless night on the Internet here i come

KnifeOfTheDead
07-17-2008, 11:24 PM
yeah, it took me a while to find the goggled lizard, but i found it dang it!

PhinzN703
07-18-2008, 10:53 AM
http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4182955

IMO if it was some sort of human NASA wouldn't have released the footage.


http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/07/recall1-1.jpg


Looks more like Douglas Quaid to me :lol:

ih8brady
07-18-2008, 11:28 PM
No offense taken. As I said, I AM familiar (not unfamiliar) with what is going on as I keep tabs on this type of stuff, from many sources. I have an interest in science and discovery and I have a deep respect for all the men and women who put together these experiemnts and projects. It blows my mind that we can even get something to land on Mars, let alone perform lab experiments. So hats off to you and your colleagues.

I just don't think we're going to find anything.


:err::err: Am I the only one who remembers the fossils found on Mars being on the cover of several mags about ten years ago? I did a super-fast google search and found this:

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/07/mars_microbe_sm-1.jpg

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/07/masterCII010-1.jpg

And how can you say that for certain?

Tetragrammaton
07-19-2008, 12:53 PM
Larry King was talking about UFO's a few days ago. So, they aren't there because they are already here.

Dolphan7
07-19-2008, 05:42 PM
:err::err: Am I the only one who remembers the fossils found on Mars being on the cover of several mags about ten years ago? I did a super-fast google search and found this:

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/07/mars_microbe_sm-1.jpg

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/07/masterCII010-1.jpg

And how can you say that for certain?And what have you found here? Really? A picture? An article?

There is much debate over these pictures as to whether they are fossils or not, but the tell tale evidence to me is this: If these are fossils, which indicate life, which would prove Life on Mars.......why are we still looking for evidence of life on Mars in 2008?

Jimi
07-20-2008, 01:30 AM
What i think a lot of people look past is that how can you say sure what a species from another planet requires for life? Is it that unlikely something we know nothing about might possibly need different elements for survival then us?

PhinzN703
07-21-2008, 11:27 AM
And what have you found here? Really? A picture? An article?

There is much debate over these pictures as to whether they are fossils or not, but the tell tale evidence to me is this: If these are fossils, which indicate life, which would prove Life on Mars.......why are we still looking for evidence of life on Mars in 2008?

I wouldn't exactly assume that the government would tell the public the entire truth. There could be life on Mars and we'd know nothing about it.

Dolphan7
07-21-2008, 12:34 PM
I wouldn't exactly assume that the government would tell the public the entire truth. There could be life on Mars and we'd know nothing about it.Life on Mars is Big News! It wouldn't be suppressed. It couldn't be suppressed. Do you know how many people are involved in the project? Thousands. That is allot of people to keep quiet.

Miamian
07-21-2008, 01:26 PM
yeah, it took me a while to find the goggled lizard, but i found it dang it!

Apparently five months. :sidelol:

Actually, even with Malcolm's arrow I still don't see anything that resembles a lizard wearing goggles.

Eshlemon
07-29-2008, 03:37 PM
Apparently five months. :sidelol:

Actually, even with Malcolm's arrow I still don't see anything that resembles a lizard wearing goggles.

Whew, glad I'm still not the only one. I've squinted and stared but still don't see it.

Mile High Fin
08-28-2008, 04:20 PM
Funny stuff in this thread.

Most likely: Mars had some kind of microbiological life long ago (billions of years) in its past, when it was warmer and had liquid water, and more of an atmosphere.
But, today, it's very unlikely to still exist (although slightly possible).
I'm all for sending more missions to continue looking.

I'm most excited about a future mission to Europa (like in 15 years probably). They're already doing research on landers that could melt through a couple miles of ice to get down to the liquid "ocean" underneath, sending back pictures/data. That would be some cool sh!t.

PhinzN703
09-01-2008, 09:07 PM
Apparently five months. :sidelol:

Actually, even with Malcolm's arrow I still don't see anything that resembles a lizard wearing goggles.

You and me both :hi5::sidelol:

PhinzN703
09-01-2008, 09:09 PM
Life on Mars is Big News! It wouldn't be suppressed. It couldn't be suppressed. Do you know how many people are involved in the project? Thousands. That is allot of people to keep quiet.

True but for some reason, I think the government could somehow and someway shut everyone up.

Seen too many movies I guess

SpaceMountain16
09-07-2008, 11:04 AM
It's RDS people!