PDA

View Full Version : Can DET be a trade partner?



MrEd
01-29-2008, 01:32 AM
*dont sleep on a potential trade with DET that may involve s rogers, r williams, the #15 pick, and a second day pick for the #1 overall pick.* ;)

u heard it here first.

zach8111
01-29-2008, 01:47 AM
*dont sleep on a potential trade with DET that may involve s rogers, r williams, the #15 pick, and a second day pick for the #1 overall pick.* ;)

u heard it here first.
actually i heard it somewhere else awhile ago

TheAmazingCloin
01-29-2008, 02:05 AM
matt millen is indeed dumb enough. so defiantely possibility.

Phinzone
01-29-2008, 02:10 AM
The trade that interests me the most that no one is talking about (because I'm sure there's like .01% chance of it happening) would be with Arizona for Fitzgerald. Fitz is set to make a HUGE amount of money this year, and they will ask him to renegotiate...rumor has it if he refuses their open to dealing him. Like Fitz more than williams. Won't happen, but one can dream right?!

southjerzmastax
01-29-2008, 02:13 AM
anything can happen here on out...but i dont want shaun rogers...but ill take roy williams...we need a WR along side Ted Ginn...

moonman
01-29-2008, 03:36 AM
The trade that interests me the most that no one is talking about (because I'm sure there's like .01% chance of it happening) would be with Arizona for Fitzgerald. Fitz is set to make a HUGE amount of money this year, and they will ask him to renegotiate...rumor has it if he refuses their open to dealing him. Like Fitz more than williams. Won't happen, but one can dream right?!


Larry Fitzgerald is unreal. I would pick him over any WR in the NFL right now, given his age and ceiling.

Myles Fynch
01-29-2008, 03:40 AM
matt millen is indeed dumb enough. so defiantely possibility.

He was also running down the #1 overall pick while he was at the Senior Bowl because he didn't think there was a stud worth moving up for. So either he's already started negotiating with us through the press or he isn't interested.

Don't want Rogers unless he's so cheap draft pick wise that when he busts out with us, people say, "So what, he didn't cost anything but WH's money."

Elliott 1
01-29-2008, 06:05 AM
He was also running down the #1 overall pick while he was at the Senior Bowl because he didn't think there was a stud worth moving up for. So either he's already started negotiating with us through the press or he isn't interested.

Don't want Rogers unless he's so cheap draft pick wise that when he busts out with us, people say, "So what, he didn't cost anything but WH's money."

OK then it's Fifita all the way baby, because Soliai is probably moving back to
OL and the only real prospect in the draft is Shirley, and he's a drunken idiot.

Frankly, because of our desperation at NT, I'd go ahead and trade for Rogers and draft Jason Shirley. If either one of them plays to their potential we have something really good.

JC
01-29-2008, 07:48 AM
actually i heard it somewhere else awhile ago

as did i!

Conuficus
01-29-2008, 09:00 AM
OK then it's Fifita all the way baby, because Soliai is probably moving back to
OL and the only real prospect in the draft is Shirley, and he's a drunken idiot.

Frankly, because of our desperation at NT, I'd go ahead and trade for Rogers and draft Jason Shirley. If either one of them plays to their potential we have something really good.

So the guy Rubin from Iowa St., Bryant from A&M, Ellis who played NT in the Senior Bowl, Earl Morton from Tulane, just to name a few don't count.

Shirley won't be drafted by us. And we might not be that desperate,......Dallas had a 298lb NT this year. Size isn't everything, hand placement and leverage is. If you don't believe me ask Kelly Gregg.

DrunkenFan
01-29-2008, 09:48 AM
Trust me, we want nothing to do with Rogers. The guy is infamous for taking plays off.

BobDole
01-29-2008, 10:14 AM
i would do that trade in a second. i want em both. we get a true NT and someone to take the pressure off ginn. like it.