PDA

View Full Version : Draft Tek 7-round mock



jim1
02-09-2008, 02:04 PM
http://www.drafttek.com/round12008.html

1. Jake Long
2. Tracy Porter
2. Andre Woodson
3. Earl Bennet
4. Dre Moore
6. Bryan Kehl
7. Shannon Tevaga

I'm not crazy about it, but I like the first and last picks.

http://www.drafttek.com/round72008.html

darsey
02-09-2008, 02:15 PM
I do not like that at all.

The Confessor
02-09-2008, 02:25 PM
Hmmm..well that is one site I wont be visiting for insight. Probably run by freaking patriots..

Pathetic Mock actually if you ask me.

Frayser
02-09-2008, 02:35 PM
Hmmm..well that is one site I wont be visiting for insight. Probably run by freaking patriots..

Pathetic Mock actually if you ask me.

It's actually a pretty decent site. I don't like the Jake Long pick, but I understand it. I don't know much about Porter, but Woodson would be great value at the bottom of Round 2. Bennett is a great talent who, opposite Ginn, would be another big play threat. When Bennett had Cutler throwing to him, he was the most dangerous receiver in the SEC. Vanderbilt beat Tennessee in Knoxville (for the first time in 30 or so years) on a 4th quarter drive where Cutler basically just kept chucking the ball to Bennett, who just could not be covered and even when he was still came down with the ball. I would be thrilled if we picked him.

jim1
02-09-2008, 02:58 PM
It's actually a pretty decent site. I don't like the Jake Long pick, but I understand it. I don't know much about Porter, but Woodson would be great value at the bottom of Round 2. Bennett is a great talent who, opposite Ginn, would be another big play threat. When Bennett had Cutler throwing to him, he was the most dangerous receiver in the SEC. Vanderbilt beat Tennessee in Knoxville (for the first time in 30 or so years) on a 4th quarter drive where Cutler basically just kept chucking the ball to Bennett, who just could not be covered and even when he was still came down with the ball. I would be thrilled if we picked him.

I like the site, but I'm not crazy about this version of the mock. It's not that bad, though. Unlike most I'm for Jake Long at #1, looks like he's gaining a little momentum, too. Dorsey is a great player, JLong is a better fit. If we can trade down and take JLong, that's aces in my book.

The Confessor
02-09-2008, 03:00 PM
It's actually a pretty decent site. I don't like the Jake Long pick, but I understand it. I don't know much about Porter, but Woodson would be great value at the bottom of Round 2. Bennett is a great talent who, opposite Ginn, would be another big play threat. When Bennett had Cutler throwing to him, he was the most dangerous receiver in the SEC. Vanderbilt beat Tennessee in Knoxville (for the first time in 30 or so years) on a 4th quarter drive where Cutler basically just kept chucking the ball to Bennett, who just could not be covered and even when he was still came down with the ball. I would be thrilled if we picked him.

Jake Long? No thanks, not unless we trade down 5-8 spots

Tracy Porter: Is a 5-11 185 lb CB who Wont go first day much less first round (as our 2-1 really is a first rounder)

Andre Woodson is an absolute project, and A: We already have one and b: isnt any better than what we have

Earl Bennett is a nice player, I will give you that, but I think this is a bit early, and we have far-greater needs

Dre moore is a big-body, but not very athletic and will be a few years out at best at DT (Not to mention I think I remember hearing character issues)

Bryan Kehl-LB from BYU would be a nice special teamer, nothing more

Shannon Tevega-Could be a nice backup Olineman. Not a bad pick




Zero chance we go Offense with 2 of the first three picks..No chance we dont take SERIOUS steps to stop the run (Wasnt addressed what-so-ever). No chance we DONT take a TE at all...

Sorry, but I think some of these "Guru's" throw names into a hat and pick randomly

jim1
02-09-2008, 03:10 PM
Jake Long? No thanks, not unless we trade down 5-8 spots

Tracy Porter: Is a 5-11 185 lb CB who Wont go first day much less first round (as our 2-1 really is a first rounder)

Andre Woodson is an absolute project, and A: We already have one and b: isnt any better than what we have

Earl Bennett is a nice player, I will give you that, but I think this is a bit early, and we have far-greater needs

Dre moore is a big-body, but not very athletic and will be a few years out at best at DT (Not to mention I think I remember hearing character issues)

Bryan Kehl-LB from BYU would be a nice special teamer, nothing more

Shannon Tevega-Could be a nice backup Olineman. Not a bad pick




Zero chance we go Offense with 2 of the first three picks..No chance we dont take SERIOUS steps to stop the run (Wasnt addressed what-so-ever). No chance we DONT take a TE at all...

Sorry, but I think some of these "Guru's" throw names into a hat and pick randomly

I think that the Draft Tek pics are computer generated. It's just a mock draft, don't have a thrombo over it.

The Confessor
02-09-2008, 03:15 PM
I think that the Draft Tek pics are computer generated. It's just a mock draft, don't have a thrombo over it.


:up:-Gotcha...Not really irrate or anything, just pointing em out. Yeah, I could see that being a computer generated draft then.

BTW: What in the world is a thrombo :sidelol:

jim1
02-09-2008, 03:34 PM
:up:-Gotcha...Not really irrate or anything, just pointing em out. Yeah, I could see that being a computer generated draft then.

BTW: What in the world is a thrombo :sidelol:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrombosis

The Confessor
02-09-2008, 03:36 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrombosis


Wow, that is pretty serious. Thanks, I dont want to have a "Thrombo" :up:

Frayser
02-09-2008, 04:00 PM
Jake Long? No thanks, not unless we trade down 5-8 spots

Tracy Porter: Is a 5-11 185 lb CB who Wont go first day much less first round (as our 2-1 really is a first rounder)

Andre Woodson is an absolute project, and A: We already have one and b: isnt any better than what we have

Earl Bennett is a nice player, I will give you that, but I think this is a bit early, and we have far-greater needs

Dre moore is a big-body, but not very athletic and will be a few years out at best at DT (Not to mention I think I remember hearing character issues)

Bryan Kehl-LB from BYU would be a nice special teamer, nothing more

Shannon Tevega-Could be a nice backup Olineman. Not a bad pick




Zero chance we go Offense with 2 of the first three picks..No chance we dont take SERIOUS steps to stop the run (Wasnt addressed what-so-ever). No chance we DONT take a TE at all...

Sorry, but I think some of these "Guru's" throw names into a hat and pick randomly

Everyone has their opinions, and clearly you have yours. I never said I wanted Jake Long. I just said I understand it. I'm not sure what is wrong with Porter's size, and you forgot to mention that he has 4.38 speed. I think every QB in this draft is a "prospect." That doesn't mean Woodson isn't a bargain at the bottom of Round 2. I am a Beck supporter, but it remains to be seen whether Parcells/Ireland/Sparano feel the same way.

I wouldn't be thrilled with this draft at all, but I think it addresses the majority of our issues in a fairly rational manner (aside from TE where I agree with you . . . we would clearly have to address that somewhere). As was said, the site is a computer simulation taking into account data from several other draft sites along with information supplied by fans of each team. It serves best as a simple guideline to the possible draft strategies of teams (and how that effects where players might fall).

jim1
02-09-2008, 05:03 PM
Everyone has their opinions, and clearly you have yours. I never said I wanted Jake Long. I just said I understand it. I'm not sure what is wrong with Porter's size, and you forgot to mention that he has 4.38 speed. I think every QB in this draft is a "prospect." That doesn't mean Woodson isn't a bargain at the bottom of Round 2. I am a Beck supporter, but it remains to be seen whether Parcells/Ireland/Sparano feel the same way.

I wouldn't be thrilled with this draft at all, but I think it addresses the majority of our issues in a fairly rational manner (aside from TE where I agree with you . . . we would clearly have to address that somewhere). As was said, the site is a computer simulation taking into account data from several other draft sites along with information supplied by fans of each team. It serves best as a simple guideline to the possible draft strategies of teams (and how that effects where players might fall).


I like your mock. I still prefer Big Jake Long, though.

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/02/bildeSiteC4Date20071231CategorySPORTS06A-1.jpg (http://cmsimg.freep.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=C4&Date=20071231&Category=SPORTS06&ArtNo=712310383&Ref=AR&Profile=1048)http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071231/SPORTS06/712310383/1048


http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2008/04/JakeLong-3.jpg

http://tedginnandtonic.blogspot.com/2008/01/possible-first-overall-pick-jake-long.html

Stitches
02-09-2008, 05:20 PM
Lobo, Porter should certainly be a 2nd rounder, but #32 may be a bit high for him. He's a 3rd rounder at worst unless his combine is really bad compared to what is expected.

The Confessor
02-09-2008, 05:39 PM
Lobo, Porter should certainly be a 2nd rounder, but #32 may be a bit high for him. He's a 3rd rounder at worst unless his combine is really bad compared to what is expected.

I Disagree completely. The draft is WAAYY to deep at CB to project him in as a 2nd rounder. I have seen him as low at 10th CB coming out..and as much as I dislike Cason because of his size, he is a giant compared to Porter


BTW 3rd round is second day now Pete:up:

2413fanphins
02-09-2008, 06:18 PM
sometimes I just can't put into words the physical size of jake long.


it's just hard to comprehend how one human can be such a giant.

what a mammoth.

playeragent2612
02-09-2008, 06:37 PM
Dre Moore wont be there in round 4. Most likely would be picked late 2nd. to 3rd round.

Stitches
02-09-2008, 07:06 PM
I Disagree completely. The draft is WAAYY to deep at CB to project him in as a 2nd rounder. I have seen him as low at 10th CB coming out..and as much as I dislike Cason because of his size, he is a giant compared to Porter


BTW 3rd round is second day now Pete:up:

I am aware of the 3rd round being 2nd day. :tongue:

ChambersWI
02-09-2008, 07:16 PM
Porter is definatly a 2nd round pick, but 32 is probably too high. In terms of contributing players, not a bad draft at all. But we could also do a lot better

TRUEPHIN
02-09-2008, 07:48 PM
I don't like any mock with Woodson coming here.

PHAZINPHINZPHAN
02-09-2008, 11:43 PM
Draft Tek is a legitimate site that i visit however this mock is AWFUL

swampfox
02-10-2008, 06:39 AM
Earl Bennett will be long gone by the third. I would feel like we hit the lottery if we get him there though :)