PDA

View Full Version : Madden 2010 TEAM Ratings Official...and a few players



Beasley
06-08-2009, 01:25 PM
WTF? why are we closer to the bottom than the top....i wil have more player ratings in a few....just 2 for now

"These may not necessarily be final however they will provide at the very least a good idea of what to expect" per player ratings....

Taylor- 79
Ginn- 78
Porter- 94
Long- 91
Pennington- 85
Fasano- 83
Davis- 77
White- 65
S. Smith- 75
Brown -89
Langford- 71
Crowder- 81
Bell- 81
Allen- 75
Henne- 66
Bess- 73
Williams- 77
Clemons- 64

also Wake....is not on the default roster......

New England Patriots 93
Pittsburgh Steelers 92
New York Giants 89
Philadelphia Eagles 88
San Diego Chargers 88
Tennessee Titans 87
Indianapolis Colts 87
Arizona Cardinals 86
Dallas Cowboys 85
Carolina Panthers 83
Baltimore Ravens 82
Atlanta Falcons 81
Minnesota Vikings 80
Washington Redskins 79
Chicago Bears 79
Buffalo Bills 78
New York Jets 78
Green Bay Packers 78
Seattle Seahawks 77
Miami Dolphins 77
Houston Texans 75
New Orleans Saints 74
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 74
San Francisco 49ers 73
Jacksonville Jaguars 71
Oakland Raiders 71
Denver Broncos 70
Kansas City Chiefs 69
Cleveland Browns 68
Cincinnati Bengals 67
St. Louis Rams 66
Detroit Lions 65

http://www.pastapadre.com/8834/madden-10-team-and-player-ratings#more-8834

muddpuppy13
06-08-2009, 02:36 PM
absolute crap i might not ever buy madden ever again

SR 7
06-08-2009, 05:44 PM
are tehse real? if so where did you get them? do you have the details on them as far as speed accel etc?

SR 7
06-08-2009, 05:47 PM
rem these rosters have changed drastically from the 08/07 they are more like the 2005 ones.

a guy rated lets say 83-88 is a 75-83 now. a guy rated 81 or 79 is a 70-75.

the numbers were inflated last year thats why.

so taylor is like a 84, ginn an 84, porter a 97, long a 94, penn a 90, fasano a 87, etc is what basically tehy would be last year. see how inflated that can get and how quickly? there were good players in the 90s last year.

RaboGrande24
06-08-2009, 10:18 PM
will allen a 75?

SR 7
06-08-2009, 11:26 PM
allen will never get love until he has 15 ints in a year.

its sad.

Farmer
06-09-2009, 08:13 AM
How are teams like the redskins, bills, jets and seahawks better/same as us!?!?

also..if pat white is only 1 point less than Henne, might as well use him. Not happy about the team rankings.

SR 7
06-10-2009, 02:29 PM
thats whta makes NO sense.
a playoff team, with a lot of good ABOVE avg-to good players has a team rating of 77 compared to losers like bills and Shawks.

also, its b/c guys like Bell (81), Wilson (84), Cam/bess (72/73), Grove (81), W Allen (75), Langford (71) got shafted on ratings. Bell is an 84 at least and Wilson is a 86 atlesat. Allen is clear cut 80-84 guy. Cam and bess at least a 77 and grove at least an 83.

numbers like that as usual cost miami the rating they deserve.

Clipse
06-10-2009, 04:43 PM
As SR 7 said. The ratings this year are lower than past years. Last year, even average players we're around 80.

If you want to complain about the ratings, go look at the top ratings in each position, talk about a big joke :lol:. Brandon Jacobs and Ronnie Brown both miss the top 10, while backs like Marion Barber and Maurice Jones-Drew are in the top 10. Moss and Welker are both rated over 94, while T.O. isn't even in the top 10 WR's. Pennington isn't in the top 10 QB's, which is absurd.

And the overall team ratings are absolutely laughable, the Jets and Bills both being better than us is a complete joke all in itself, but the Patriots the best team in the game? The Cowboys still get rated high every year, despite not doing ****? Just looking at the 7-8 teams right above us is laughable as well.

John Biello
06-12-2009, 02:14 PM
i wish madden would get away from the speed and height being such dominating factors, then maybe the ratings would balance out a bit better.

SR 7
06-12-2009, 06:19 PM
and the texans got robbed as wel and the seahawks, the ****ing seahawks got the rating of the decade

Tetragrammaton
06-14-2009, 10:17 AM
The full ratings are odd. Why is Starks listed as an offensive lineman? Why is Wilford better than London? Taylor a defensive lineman?

CHRIS CLEMONS
07-08-2009, 02:35 PM
Thankfully there is changes throughout the season based on player performance. I bet you all that if we make the playoffs again this year we will be in the top 8 teams. Everyone thinks last year was a fluke. We need to show them that 1-15 is the fluke.

schmitty8225
07-15-2009, 09:11 PM
Seems about right for players. Players that played great last year are 90's, players that played good got 80's, and players that played OK got 70's. They applied some legacy and age to the ratings and got some decent ratings. The team rating should be much higher though.

BARF
07-16-2009, 05:47 AM
wtf, we are worse than the bills and jets.

BARF
07-16-2009, 05:49 AM
wasn't jake long rated 95 last year, he allowed 2.5 sacks and went to the pro bowl, and he is rated lower

emeraldfin
07-16-2009, 07:34 AM
Being rated lower than the Bills makes no sense.

BARF
07-16-2009, 11:41 PM
we are rated lower than the bills cuz the got t.o. we should be rated lower than those dam jets they do not have qb

BigBenny13
07-25-2009, 12:21 AM
how does a team win the division and rank last talent? no way the phins are worse than the bills and jets

John Biello
07-25-2009, 09:07 AM
that is my issue as well, i understand lowering ratings league wide...which i agree with. i like the idea of a broader spectrum of player and abilities in the game. what i don't like is just a few of our player ratings, but especially our overall middle of the pack ranking that is what i think is garbage. hopefully we whup on some people early in the year and the roster updates are kind to us. do any of you guys know if the roster updates improve team overall online? i seem to remember it always staying the same regardless.

Clipse
07-25-2009, 08:25 PM
that is my issue as well, i understand lowering ratings league wide...which i agree with. i like the idea of a broader spectrum of player and abilities in the game. what i don't like is just a few of our player ratings, but especially our overall middle of the pack ranking that is what i think is garbage. hopefully we whup on some people early in the year and the roster updates are kind to us. do any of you guys know if the roster updates improve team overall online? i seem to remember it always staying the same regardless.
They did last year, so I assume it will be the same this year.

wkedklwnz
07-25-2009, 10:37 PM
My biggest question is, why is Brady a 98 and Pennington an 85?
Penn is just as accurate, just as "aware", the only real difference is Brady is able to throw deep with zip and Randy Moss. If there is any kind of leadership type rating Penn would be equal there as well, I am just not seeing that big of a difference between the 2 other than the deep ball.

And for that matter, why are the Pats rated so high? They have a qb, 2 wr, a dt and lb. They have lost their best cb and safety in the past 2 years. Fred Taylor is getting old, as is Galloway, they should be rated high 70's low 80's at best.

I dont know maybe I'm just bitter

Clipse
07-26-2009, 10:48 AM
Because the Patriots and Cowboys are always overrated in Madden.

Farmer
07-28-2009, 08:57 AM
they released the official ratings.
http://espn.go.com/videogames/features/madden/madden10?teamId=12

Roth got really screwed over. and Henne is only 1 point overall better than White.

Also, they have Wilford and London on there with no Hartline which is surprising to me.

arsenal
07-28-2009, 10:13 AM
will allen got screwed most, 75? wow... and our D line is atrocious

PhinPhan910
08-02-2009, 11:25 AM
Its all Bull****.

PhinPhan910
08-02-2009, 11:27 AM
Even if chad pennington throws 100 td's next year and 0 interceptions he will never be rated higher than 88, even if Ronnie Brown does what he was going to do in 07, he will never be higher than 89, no matter what they do, our receivers will never be higher than 80.