PDA

View Full Version : The case for NOT drafting NT @ #12



phinfreak
04-06-2010, 11:47 PM
There is no way, IMHO, that this regime spends a #12 pick on a position that effectively is on the field for only 2 downs.

Even if Dan Williams is there, the Fins wont pull the trigger on this guy. Suh will be gone anyway.

This regime will want a difference maker on every down, therefore, it will be either an OLB/DE hybrid player that can play run/pass, or it will be a #1 WR that can catch and block.

#12 pick is a high cost high risk pick, I just dont see this regime spending it on a part time player, especially with the success Parcells has had in later rounds with NT's at Dallas.

Slim
04-07-2010, 12:00 AM
Agreed... Parcells will find us a NT in the later rounds.

We draft B Graham at #12.

phinfreak
04-07-2010, 12:05 AM
I love this guy from Miiiiiiiiichigan!

j-off-her-doll
04-07-2010, 12:14 AM
I think there are many cases for not taking D. Williams at #12.

phinfreak
04-07-2010, 12:31 AM
I think there are many cases for not taking D. Williams at #12.


On this team, a case is easily made for not taking ANY NT.