PDA

View Full Version : Megred X3: Madden 2011 Team Ratings Released



.rush
06-05-2010, 02:54 AM
http://www.chicitysports.com/2010/06/05/madden-2011-overall-team-ratings-released/

How did your team wind up doing in the ratings? Do you think they should be higher or lower?

emeraldfin
06-05-2010, 05:43 AM
Dolphins only 78, while the Jets are 89 and the Pats are 86.

No way the Fins should be that far behind the Jets and Pats.

bobw999
06-05-2010, 07:47 AM
Redskins got the biggest improvement....+6.

Bills went down 4....2nd to worse team on Madden. LOL

Jets are overrated but at least the Pasts went down 2.

vagrantprodigy
06-05-2010, 07:55 AM
The Dolphins are probably the most underrated team on that list, and the jets may be the most overrated. I don't see any way we aren't a better team than the Cardinals, who have no QB and little defense.

SpurzN703
06-05-2010, 12:08 PM
There are so many different ratings and/or opinions as to what team is this or that, it's numb to me at this point. Throw these ratings into the rest of the pile and we can move on

R3TARDxSTRONG
06-06-2010, 12:03 AM
Rank Team Madden 11 Madden 10 Change
1 New Orleans Saints (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 92 94 -2
2 Indianapolis Colts 91 93 -2
3 Baltimore Ravens 90 87 +3
4 New York Jets (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 89 88 +1
5 Minnesota Vikings 88 90 -2
6 Green Bay Packers (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 87 87 NA
7 Dallas Cowboys 87 88 -1
8 New England Patriots (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 86 88 -2
9 Cincinnati Bengals 86 86 NA
10 San Diego Chargers (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 85 89 -4
11 Pittsburgh Steelers 84 85 -1
12 Atlanta Falcons 83 83 NA
13 New York Giants 81 81 NA
14 Philadelphia Eagles 80 86 -6
15 Arizona Cardinals 79 87 -8
16 Miami Dolphins 79 77 +2
17 San Francisco 49ers 79 78 +1
18 Houston Texans 78 82 -4
19 Denver Broncos 78 80 -2
20 Chicago Bears 77 75 +2
21 Tennessee Titans 77 79 -2
22 Washington Redskins 76 70 +6
23 Carolina Panthers 75 78 -3
24 Seattle Seahawks 75 72 +3
25 Jacksonville Jaguars 74 76 -2
26 Oakland Raiders 71 71 NA
27 Kansas City Chiefs (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 71 68 +3
28 Cleveland Browns 70 69 +1
29 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 69 67 +2
30 Detroit Lions (http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;) 68 66 +2
31 Buffalo Bills 67 71 -4
32 St. Louis Rams 66 65 +1I think we've improved more than 2 points.........Maybe not so much after dropping like 92 mil on 2 players alone...:confused:

Troysif
06-06-2010, 12:06 AM
whatever...

R3TARDxSTRONG
06-06-2010, 12:11 AM
Shows how much I pay attention....my bad haha

SeasonsMusic
06-06-2010, 12:21 AM
well throw in the towel, season over

state06
06-06-2010, 01:44 AM
we didnt go up 2, we went up 1. the ratings ive seen from every source is 78. only the list of all 32 teams you posted has us at a 79. i am thinking that is a typo.
http://www.operationsports.com/newspost.php?id=417936
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6264588.html

snap
06-08-2010, 12:06 AM
Dolphins ranked 78....jest ranked higher than the patsies!!!!!!! what a joke!!!:err::(

Troysif
06-08-2010, 12:35 AM
Okay.....

PhinsPhan11
06-08-2010, 12:36 AM
I'm surprised it's that low. I would give them about a 86 or 87, which is still respectable.

Romy148
06-08-2010, 01:02 AM
How can the Jets be rated higher?? Their RBs are mediocre, they lost Faneca, lost Rhodes, lost thomas and Washington they brough in old players and weak Cromatie. We should have been rated at a least 83.

SanDiegoFinFan7
06-08-2010, 01:17 AM
wow dude, cant believe this... we'll definetly be a 95 OVR next year when we win the superbowl

PorrotheDolfan
06-08-2010, 01:20 AM
Miami is underrated in just about every sports game, Dolphins, Heat, Marlins, as long as we win in real life that's ok, but it can be a little frustrating when you're playing with your team which is not as good as they should be and playing against a team that is better than they really are, at least those ratings aren't permanent, we have a young team so I'm sure that has a huge effect on our rating, we just need to win and the team will get better.

sharp
06-08-2010, 01:21 AM
Wow guys this isnt madden 05. The highest rated team, the saints are like a 94... colts a 93.. I think the Jets and Ravens are the next highest. I will agree thats ridiculous. We are ranked 79 i think, a +2 from the last update in madden 10. I guess that means dansby + marshall are 1 point a piece lol. Don't worry. Thats the thing with roster updates, the jets went from like a 76 to an 88 very quickly. Henne went from a 65 to a 79 very quickly. Just let the men play, then judge.

vaneasy2338
06-08-2010, 01:32 AM
I can understand why people are complaining about us having such a low rating, but why is the jets being rated higher than the patriots such a big deal (they even mentioned it on nfl live today). Wes Welker coming off an acl. Tom Brady has looked good coming back from injury, but is not playing the like the Brady of before. No one to rush the passer, average corners, I dont see why the Jets or us shouldnt be rated higher than the patriots.

DisturbedShifty
06-08-2010, 01:32 AM
*Checks Fin Heaven gaming forum* Yep. This was already posted two days ago. Thanks for the update.

footsteps_falco
06-08-2010, 02:09 AM
that sucks, we are always underrated. i bet the giants are ranked high as hell even though they went only 8-8. makes no sense, its a popularity contest. between starks, polite, carpenter, bell, vontae and sean, will allen, ronnie and ricky, jake long and everyone on the o line. these guys should all be like 90's over all( or close too, i would probably make vontae and sean like low 80's.) the only weak links on our team really are fasano, anderson, moses, jason allen, and these guys are still good lol. whatever, maddens a game, i bet LT is still a 99. sanchez is probably ranked higher then henne. so dumb. shonn greene hasn;t shown **** compared to our backs.

cafinfan408
06-08-2010, 02:29 AM
It doesnt matter. Ill still Smash.
Team ranking dont matter to much.
Individual players do though. I hope henne gets at least a 80

madmic21
06-08-2010, 02:54 AM
Add Marshall and Dansby, plus good needs draft and only 78... Retarded!

SebasMiamiFan
06-14-2010, 12:50 AM
What BS! EA Sports is full of homers.

SRM
06-21-2010, 09:15 PM
Marshall is rated a 96 in Madden 11 if anyone was wondering. That makes him #3 of all receivers, with Dre and Fitz and #1 and #2. Marshall was a 94 in Madden 10.

Mr_Freezetag
06-21-2010, 09:27 PM
I expected about 80-83 was fair for the fins this year. The fact that we are a young team doesn't help in the video game. Lots of potential that has not flourished yet. But for me I would only play as the Dolphins when I would play online and if you know how to use any team with their strengths you can beat a team in the 90's.

Our receivers are improved (I wonder how badly they rated Hartline and Bess), RB's are still strong in the virtual world, the O-line is solid, Henne could only go up in ratings, but our defense when it comes to ratings could have been why the team didn't get a higher mark. But with all those improvements on offense I don't see how we could have only moved up 1 (or 2 depending on what site is right) point with 2 highly rated players (Marshall/Dansby) added to the team...

Wait for that first solid update and we will be in the low 80's

SRM
06-22-2010, 01:17 PM
Top Players
C. Johnson HB - 99
P. Willis MLB - 99
D. Revis CB - 99
J. Allen RE - 99
D. Brees QB - 99
P. Manning QB - 99
R. Clady LT - 98
A. Peterson HB - 98

Top Quarterbacks
D. Brees - 99
P. Manning - 99
T. Brady - 95
A. Rodgers - 94
P. Rivers - 94
B. Favre - 92
T. Romo - 90
M. Shaub - 89

Top Running Backs
C. Johnson - 99
A. Peterson - 98
M. Jones-Drew - 96
S. Jackson - 95
F. Gore - 93
D. Williams - 92
R. Rice - 90
M. Turner - 90

Top Fullbacks
T. Richardson - 94
L. Polite - 91
L. Weaver - 90
L. McLain - 90
L. Vickers - 89
O. Mughelli - 88
M. Hedgecock - 86
M. Karney - 85

Top Wide Receivers
A. Johnson - 98
L. Fitzgerald - 97
B. Marshall - 96
R. Wayne - 96
R. Moss - 95
R. White - 93
S. Smith - 92
D. Jackson - 91

Top Tight Ends
Tony Gonzalez - 98
J. Witten - 97
V. Davis - 96
A. Gates - 96
D. Clark - 96
H. Miller - 90
C. Cooley - 89
K. Winslow - 89

Top Left Tackles
R. Clardy - 98
J. Long - 96
J. Thomas - 95
M. Roos - 95
J. Gross - 95
D. Ferguson - 91
J. Brown - 91
B. McKinnie - 90

Top Left Guards
S. Hutchinson - 97
L. Mankins - 95
B. Grubbs - 94
K. Dielman - 93
C. Nicks - 91
E. Steinback - 91
A. Faneca - 91
T. Herremans - 89

Top Centers
N. Mangold - 97
A. Gurode - 92
J. Saturday - 92
S. O'Hara - 91
M. Birk - 91
R. Kalil - 90
J. Brown - 89
D. Koppen - 88

Top Right Guards
J. Evans - 98
C. Snee - 96
L. Davis - 89
D. Joseph - 88
B. Moore - 88
B. Williams - 88
H. Dahl - 87
J. Scott - 85

Top Right Tackles
J. Stinchcomb - 90
D. Stewart - 89
D. Woody - 89
J. Otah - 86
J. Gaither - 86
V. Carey - 86
R. Harris - 85
E. Winston - 85

Top Left Ends
R. Mathis - 95
J. Tuck - 92
R. Seymour - 92
L. Castillo - 88
A. Smith - 87
C. Campbell - 86
S. Ellis - 86
R. Edwards - 85

Top Right Ends
J. Allen - 99
D. Freeney - 97
M. Williams - 95
T. Cole - 95
J. Peppers - 95
H. Ngata - 94
D. Dockett - 94
W. Smith - 90

Top Defensive Tackles
K. Williams - 97
V. Wilfork - 95
J. Ratliff - 94
K. Jenkins - 94
S. Rogers - 93
C. Hampton - 91
A. Franklin - 90
R. Starks - 89

Top LOLB
L. Woodley - 91
S. Phillips - 91
D. Smith - 89
T. Davis - 87
B. Cushing - 87
J. Peterson - 86
B. Orakpo - 85
R. Maualuga - 85

Top MLB
P. Willis - 99
J. Beason - 96
R. Lewis - 94
D. Harris - 91
B. Ruud - 91
L. Fletcher - 91
D. Ryans - 90
J. Vilma - 90

Top ROLB
D. Ware - 97
J. Harrison - 97
E. Dumervil - 93
L. Briggs - 92
T. Suggs - 90
C. Greenway - 88
K. Rivers - 86
C. Matthews - 86

Top Corners
D. Revis - 99
N. Asomugha - 98
C. Woodson - 97
C. Bailey - 95
A. Samuel - 94
J. Joseph - 93
L. Hall - 92
C. Finnegan -92

Top FS
E. Reed - 97
A. Bethea - 95
D. Sharper - 94
N. Collins - 93
O. Atogwe - 92
B. Dawkins - 90
T. Jackson - 88
K. Rhodes - 88

Top SS
T. Polamalu - 97
A. Wilson - 96
B. Sanders - 89
B. Merriweather - 88
L. Landry - 87
T. Branch - 86
J. Leonhard - 85
B. Pollard - 84

Top Kickers
R. Gould - 95
N. Kaeding - 95
R. Bironas - 93
R. Longwell - 92
S. Gostowski - 91
S. Janikowski - 90
J. Hanson - 89
D. Akers - 89

Top Punters
S. Lechlar - 98
A. Lee - 94
D. Jones - 94
M. Scifres - 93
M. McBriar - 92
D. Colquitt - 91
B. Moorman - 90
S. Koch - 86

Out of this..

Long-96 (#2 at position)
Marshall-96 (#3 at position)
Polite-91 (#2 at position)
Starks-89 (#8 at position)
Carey-86 (#6 at position)

Some notes.. Ronnie is in the 80's, not sure how high/low, Clemons has 92 speed, White has 87 speed, JIM LEONHARD IS RATED BETTER THAN BELL. I'm not sure what Bell's rating is, but he is not in the top SS column and is no better than an 84.

misterx
06-28-2010, 03:23 PM
http://espn.go.com/videogames/madden11?teamId=12

all dolphins rating are up

Mr_Freezetag
06-28-2010, 04:32 PM
http://espn.go.com/videogames/madden11?teamId=12

all dolphins rating are up


Thank you dude. Would have never known where to find that.

After my first glance:

- look at Bess' speed & acceleration compared to Hartline's - are they serious? Hartline is much quicker.
- Camarillo's catching is only a 83 - the man has sticky grip hands
- besides Dansby and Crowder our LB core is rated pretty badly.
- Henne was short changed in a few categories IMO

Oh boy can't wait for the roster update after the game is released...

BobDole
06-28-2010, 06:39 PM
so even they have clemons as a SS and jones as a FS. they know what they're talking about. pffffffft.

vagrantprodigy
06-30-2010, 09:40 AM
I expected about 80-83 was fair for the fins this year. The fact that we are a young team doesn't help in the video game. Lots of potential that has not flourished yet. But for me I would only play as the Dolphins when I would play online and if you know how to use any team with their strengths you can beat a team in the 90's.


While I agree that we are a young team, with lots of potential, the problem I see with the roster is that if you look at the players, they made some like Edds who have tons of potential into players with no room for growth. It doesn't matter how high his tackle or awareness goes in a franchise mode game, no one wants a coverage linebacker with speed, accel, and agi in the 60's and 70's.

Mr_Freezetag
07-03-2010, 04:16 PM
While I agree that we are a young team, with lots of potential, the problem I see with the roster is that if you look at the players, they made some like Edds who have tons of potential into players with no room for growth. It doesn't matter how high his tackle or awareness goes in a franchise mode game, no one wants a coverage linebacker with speed, accel, and agi in the 60's and 70's.

Well what you are missing, along with all of us who have seen the RATINGS is that they do not tell us what the players POTENTIAL is until you own the game. So someone who may be in the 60's or low 70's but has a "B" or an "A" potential will improve through the seasons you play with in Franchise. I understand some people may not play the game that way but you referenced that mode. For instance Vontae Davis was in the mid or low 70's (average CB skills) and his potential was an "A". So by season 2 of the franchise mode he was already bumped up to about 80. I mean in reality players just because they are supposed to be good don't always pan out. You can't just rate every promising rookie high strictly on potential.

But potential is exactly what it is. They have the skillset to be able to succeed as an NFL player but have not yet. You can't rate the unproven fairly in any case whether they are the 1st overall pick or the 235th. Until they play no one will know. And that is what roster updates are for...

vagrantprodigy
07-04-2010, 08:29 AM
Yes, but last time I played Madden, stuff like accel, agility, strength, and speed didn't improve a whole lot. If was the actual skills, coverage ability, awareness, play recognition, that would jump with good coaching. That's why Edds has me upset. Those skills are already ok, but he seems like he has no potential in the game, at those ratings.

Mr_Freezetag
07-04-2010, 02:24 PM
Depending on how you use the player, and how good his stats are will determine what particular ratings will jump. But I hear what you are saying. Like last year with Henne. It was a bit frustrating using him in the franchise mode because his potential was good but I never got him rated as high as 76 or higher. And for me he kept getting injured so I just ran the ball a lot and used pat white lol.

BobDole
07-06-2010, 06:03 PM
Depending on how you use the player, and how good his stats are will determine what particular ratings will jump. But I hear what you are saying. Like last year with Henne. It was a bit frustrating using him in the franchise mode because his potential was good but I never got him rated as high as 76 or higher. And for me he kept getting injured so I just ran the ball a lot and used pat white lol.

i got him up to about 86 before he stopped getting better. in yo face! :lol:

Mr_Freezetag
07-07-2010, 02:13 AM
i got him up to about 86 before he stopped getting better. in yo face! :lol:

He got injured for me the first 2 seasons so I traded him. sucka

Better off using Pennington anyways

BobDole
07-07-2010, 02:33 AM
He got injured for me the first 2 seasons so I traded him. sucka

Better off using Pennington anyways

yeah i'm lucky in terms of injuries usually. and i'm such a punk that if an important guy like henne goes out for the season i just play that game over again. i couldn't do pennington though - i throw the ball deep too much - and that just doesn't work out.

i can't wait to see the 'potential' ratings for these guys. if wake and misi are B's or worse they are gone. i don't even mess with B's unless they're around 80 as a rook. i'm currently in year 15 or so of my franchise and have managed to get almost every starter in the 90's - although they're all old as balls. i'm probably gonna do something crazy next year to get matthews and cushing as my OLB's - real young, A potential, and already in the upper 80's. i'll probably get both those guys up to 99. can't wait for this **** to come out. i've been waiting for the last original dolphin to retire before i move on to the next one but big jake's still dominating at like 40. fugger won't retire. :lol: