PDA

View Full Version : Ndamukong Suh tries to kick an extra point.



X-Pacolypse
11-07-2010, 05:18 PM
http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/11/07/lions-lose-hanson-to-injury-suh-misses-pat-try/?module=HP_headlines

Dolfan3773
11-07-2010, 06:34 PM
LOL...I saw that. This guys is going to be a stud though.

overworkedirish
11-09-2010, 04:27 PM
If coach says "kick," Suh says, "how high?" He just forgot to ask "how centered?" also.

Joe Fitz
11-09-2010, 05:14 PM
The sad thing is, if he makes the kick that game never goes to OT and the Jets lose.

dreday
11-10-2010, 01:00 AM
tom dempsey he is not...

justdev7
11-10-2010, 01:12 AM
I played ball in high school with him and believe it or not he used to kickoff for us. He wasn't exactly accurate but he got good distance. Consequently nobody wanted to return kicks against us

Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk

KlausC
11-11-2010, 06:12 PM
The sad thing is, if he makes the kick that game never goes to OT and the Jets lose.

Yup, because everything in the game would have played out exactly the same if he had made it - right down to the Jets kicking a FG at the end to be down by 1 instead of tied. :rolleyes:

PhinsPhan11
11-11-2010, 08:41 PM
It was too bad he missed because the game could have been totally different.

Joe Fitz
11-13-2010, 07:08 PM
Yup, because everything in the game would have played out exactly the same if he had made it - right down to the Jets kicking a FG at the end to be down by 1 instead of tied. :rolleyes:

Uhh there was 4 seconds left in the game when they kicked a FG to tie it, let me guess the Jets were playing for a tie the whole second half instead of trying to get the win without overtime.

KlausC
11-13-2010, 07:10 PM
Uhh there was 4 seconds left in the game when they kicked a FG to tie it, let me guess the Jets were playing for a tie the whole second half instead of trying to get the win without overtime.

Are you too dense to realize the Jets play calling would have changed had they known they needed two TD's instead of a TD and a FG with 4 minutes to go?

Even if you can't figure that much out, I'd expect you to realize we would have taken a shot at the endzone rather than attempt a FG at the end.

Joe Fitz
11-13-2010, 07:37 PM
Are you too dense to realize the Jets play calling would have changed had they known they needed two TD's instead of a TD and a FG with 4 minutes to go?

Even if you can't figure that much out, I'd expect you to realize we would have taken a shot at the endzone rather than attempt a FG at the end.
Of course but what are the chances that they complete a 20 yard pass with everyone defending the endzone? Slim.

So you are pretty much telling me they played to go into OT instead of playing to win in the 4th, which is hilarious.

KlausC
11-13-2010, 07:44 PM
Of course but what are the chances that they complete a 20 yard pass with everyone defending the endzone? Slim.

So you are pretty much telling me they played to go into OT instead of playing to win in the 4th, which is hilarious.

When you only need a FG to tie with the clock under 2 minutes and no timeouts your #1 priority is to get into FG range and the plays are called accordingly. We were able to run passes over the middle and dump offs to LT. Had we been down 7, we would have had to have done more vertical passing towards the sidelines in an attempt to get into a position to score 7. It's called situational football. You must be new to the game if you're unaware of these things.

Also, however slim the chances of completing a 20 yard TD pass are in that situation, it's hardly something that hasn't been done before. Your statement was that "The Jets would have lost". A definitive statement with no room for error. Sorry, but you were obviously incorrect in making that statement.

Joe Fitz
11-13-2010, 10:49 PM
When you only need a FG to tie with the clock under 2 minutes and no timeouts your #1 priority is to get into FG range and the plays are called accordingly. We were able to run passes over the middle and dump offs to LT. Had we been down 7, we would have had to have done more vertical passing towards the sidelines in an attempt to get into a position to score 7. It's called situational football. You must be new to the game if you're unaware of these things.

Also, however slim the chances of completing a 20 yard TD pass are in that situation, it's hardly something that hasn't been done before. Your statement was that "The Jets would have lost". A definitive statement with no room for error. Sorry, but you were obviously incorrect in making that statement.

Of course they are going to run dump offs to LT and short passes over the middle, what else is Sanchez capible of?

KlausC
11-13-2010, 10:54 PM
Of course they are going to run dump offs to LT and short passes over the middle, what else is Sanchez capible of?

I don't know, I guess you're right.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwvZ5GAtQsA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha3VigStu94

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzQ8thzcT7s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=127WJ3sh14A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5vOvAxcw70

Joe Fitz
11-13-2010, 11:08 PM
Did you just show me 4 passes to prove a point? I can find 4 deep passes for everyone in the NFL except Chad Henne.

KlausC
11-13-2010, 11:14 PM
Did you just show me 4 passes to prove a point? I can find 4 deep passes for everyone in the NFL except Chad Henne.

I don't know, maybe because you just told me Sanchez was incapable of throwing down field? It's also worth noting Sanchez is tied for 2nd in the NFL for 40+ yard passes. I guess you prefer ignorance to reality. That's fine. It's not like he completed exactly the same pass we would have needed in almost the exact situation earlier in the same game or anything. Keep dreaming and living in happy land. You know what they say, there's no point in arguing with an idiot. Good day sir.

KlausC
11-22-2010, 09:46 AM
Another week, another video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUY6sd3DJOU&feature=player_embedded