PDA

View Full Version : Romney/Obama = The Same



Dolphins9954
04-24-2012, 09:57 AM
IWDJEc92d38


Goldman Sachs War Party candidate A or Goldman Sachs War Party candidate B? That's your choice for 2012. The greatest illusion in America is that your vote means anything. The system is broken and the government doesn't work for the people.

MadDog 88
04-24-2012, 12:06 PM
Socialism is the answer.

Eshlemon
04-24-2012, 02:29 PM
Preposterous, if Obama had a son he would not look like one of these guys...

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

...which expect will continue to be an election political strategy by Obama team. The more richer 1% than me white mormons with a stay at home mom don't have the life experience and family values to represent and understand America. Its the politics both sides use in trying to accentuate their differences. Actually its politics as usual. I remember the Adams and Jefferson election, between friends, was one of the worst...things at the extreme such as Adams is a hermaphrodite and Jefferson the half-breed son of an Indian sqauw and everything in between.

Dolphins9954
04-24-2012, 03:11 PM
Preposterous, if Obama had a son he would not look like one of these guys...

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

...which expect will continue to be an election political strategy by Obama team. The more richer 1% than me white mormons with a stay at home mom don't have the life experience and family values to represent and understand America. Its the politics both sides use in trying to accentuate their differences. Actually its politics as usual. I remember the Adams and Jefferson election, between friends, was one of the worst...things at the extreme such as Adams is a hermaphrodite and Jefferson the half-breed son of an Indian sqauw and everything in between.

I read that they even went after Jefferson's love life with his slave. Who actually was his lover and they had many children together. Politics will always be politics. It's a dirty game. I think the difference is the policies. Pull back the curtain of rhetoric and tone and focus on policies and there isn't much difference between the 2 nowadays. At least with the Adams and Jefferson election the people had a great choice in Jefferson. Adams turned out to be a douche IMO with the Alien and Sedition Acts.

LANGER72
04-25-2012, 04:45 PM
Voting for Obama is a vote for fiscal disaster. Romney is not my ideal candidate, but he is the best hope for positive changes.

Dolphins9954
04-25-2012, 06:00 PM
Voting for Obama is a vote for fiscal disaster. Romney is not my ideal candidate, but he is the best hope for positive changes.


Romney equals fiscal disaster too. Pick your poison really. Both guys will lead our country to oblivion. The with or without lube election of 2012.

Tetragrammaton
04-26-2012, 12:09 AM
Mitt Romney is probably the best Republican nominee since H.W. Bush. I am surprised how well everything turned out after all of those lunatics dressed in silly costumes a few years back.

Valandui
04-26-2012, 02:21 AM
The worst thing that ever happened to this country was Patrick Henry not running for president.

tylerdolphin
04-26-2012, 02:38 AM
The worst thing that ever happened to this country was Patrick Henry not running for president.

That and the gays.

Dolphins9954
04-26-2012, 07:48 AM
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/04/BushEqualsObamaEqualsRomney-1.jpg

LANGER72
04-26-2012, 09:48 AM
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/04/BushEqualsObamaEqualsRomney-1.jpg


They really are not equals.
Obama can spend money faster than anyone.
Romney has not been elected yet. He gets a pass.

Locke
04-26-2012, 12:14 PM
They really are not equals.
Obama can spend money faster than anyone.
Romney has not been elected yet. He gets a pass.

Romneycare...?

Dolphins9954
04-26-2012, 12:34 PM
They really are not equals.
Obama can spend money faster than anyone.
Romney has not been elected yet. He gets a pass.

Just because Obama spends faster than Bush did. Doesn't ignore the fact that Bush was the worst spender ever before Obama came along. As for Romney he does have a better fiscal record in Mass. But he also raised taxes and gave us the monster known as Romneycare which was the creator of Obamacare. And let's not forget Romney's support for the bailouts, wars and stimulus bills. Romney also endorses Paul Ryan's budget plan which doesn't balance the budget for almost 30 YEARS!!!! So considering Romney's support for big government interventions in the markets thorugh bailouts and his support for unfundable military budgets and wars. Which by the way he wants to expand. It's probably the safest bet in the world that Romney will continue the fiscal disaster that is Washington.

ohall
04-26-2012, 01:36 PM
Romneycare...?

Are you seriously going to be someone that tries to compare what a Governor does for a state to what a President does to an entire country?

Locke
04-26-2012, 02:25 PM
Are you seriously going to be someone that tries to compare what a Governor does for a state to what a President does to an entire country?

I'm flattered by your crush, but it's not healthy to follow me thread to thread just to post your partisan-drivel...

ohall
04-26-2012, 02:41 PM
I'm flattered by your crush, but it's not healthy to follow me thread to thread just to post your partisan-drivel...

Man the ego on you. Again, don't answer a simple question. I don't blame you, the answer would put your logic in its proper light, Partisan.

Locke
04-26-2012, 02:59 PM
Man the ego on you. Again, don't answer a simple question. I don't blame you, the answer would put your logic in its proper light, Partisan.

Oh, I see how we do it. You call me what I've already called you. I haven't seen that tactic since middle school...

Dogbone34
04-26-2012, 03:45 PM
obamanomics have been a disaster

takes incompetence to a new level. nothing but bush bailout, stimulus, multiple QE's, no budget in 3 years and massive new debt.

he's idealogically opposed to less government. a solid nanny stater

Tetragrammaton
04-26-2012, 03:54 PM
he's idealogically opposed to less government.

How could a politician not be?

jjjjphin
04-27-2012, 02:31 AM
I hope they are not the same because another 4 years of a stagnant economy is not what I am looking forward to.

ohall
04-27-2012, 11:10 AM
Oh, I see how we do it. You call me what I've already called you. I haven't seen that tactic since middle school...

lol still waiting on an answer in TWO threads.

Locke
04-27-2012, 12:08 PM
lol still waiting on an answer in TWO threads.

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/04/crybaby-1.jpg

ohall
04-27-2012, 12:43 PM
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/04/crybaby-1.jpg

Seriously?

Man up dude, and I'm still waiting.

Eshlemon
04-30-2012, 02:24 PM
I read that they even went after Jefferson's love life with his slave. Who actually was his lover and they had many children together. Politics will always be politics. It's a dirty game. I think the difference is the policies. Pull back the curtain of rhetoric and tone and focus on policies and there isn't much difference between the 2 nowadays. At least with the Adams and Jefferson election the people had a great choice in Jefferson. Adams turned out to be a douche IMO with the Alien and Sedition Acts.

Yes definately about the slaves buth I put out what was the extremes. And Jefferson was a douche to, gave us our first Carville/Rove in hiring James Callendar...who's slander might even make those guys blush and was a thrown into jail. Got out, expected Jefferson to give him a job for going to jail and getting him elected but Jefferson didn't. Normally not smart to cross a Carville/Rove type. But Callendar's credibility had taken such a hit, his attempt at revenge failed miserably and had the opposite affect. What was campaing inuendo about Jefferson and slaves...which was used against anyone owning slaves...Callendear started publishing modern day "tell all books" about Jefferson and Hemings and the kids of hers that where his.