PDA

View Full Version : Your % that we draft Tannenhill at #8 ?



allsilverdreams
04-24-2012, 06:28 PM
just wondering what everyones % is when it comes to miami drafting Tannenhill at # 8
very simple and to the point ?

Slim
04-24-2012, 06:32 PM
50% of the time, we draft Tannehill every time.

Mudder1310
04-24-2012, 06:34 PM
50%

NACC
04-24-2012, 06:36 PM
50%

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 06:37 PM
0% Ireland says he already knew his picks from the combine what we see is not what they see all we get is media hype because Landry and Barkley opted out so the media moves to the next best thing. His choice is 100% nothing else and I doubt it's tannehill if he didn't lie about seeing 10 ELITE prospects in the draft which tannehill is not.

Vaark
04-24-2012, 06:38 PM
​49%

OyeDale305
04-24-2012, 06:42 PM
2.5%

CalDolFan10x14
04-24-2012, 06:42 PM
33% We either go Tanny, Floyd, or trade down to mid/late 1st round IMO.

Built2Win
04-24-2012, 06:53 PM
What ever percent it is? I hope it is a low percent i'm not sold giving up the #8 pick for an unpolished qb who threw 15 interceptions..

go phish
04-24-2012, 06:57 PM
probably was 100% before ross got involved.

allsilverdreams
04-24-2012, 06:57 PM
i was going to say 30% we draft him.
i still think we draft the best DE on the board not sure who will be left at 8 but i think we draft the DE

AZStryker
04-24-2012, 06:58 PM
What ever percent it is? I hope it is a low percent i'm not sold giving up the #8 pick for an unpolished qb who threw 15 interceptions..

You mean like Matt Ryan was when he came out?

I'll go 99.9% with Ross making the call.

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 07:01 PM
What ever percent it is? I hope it is a low percent i'm not sold giving up the #8 pick for an unpolished qb who threw 15 interceptions..

Especially one who only has 19 starts and more experienced as a WR then QB but he is a 2nd half Interception thrower specialist.

Nublar7
04-24-2012, 07:01 PM
45%

foozool13
04-24-2012, 07:03 PM
13% - Dan Marino makes the calls here

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 07:04 PM
You mean like Matt Ryan was when he came out?

I'll go 99.9% with Ross making the call.


LOL matt ryan actually started the year he came out and how can you compare the 2? Tannehill won't start until at least 2 years but he can be a good slot receiver for the Browns.

fishfanmiami
04-24-2012, 07:04 PM
25 % Same as pass rusher , WR and trade down.

Rambo
04-24-2012, 07:09 PM
25% we draft Tannehill at 8. We will trade down for additional picks in bottom of 1st and early 2nd. Ireland is sticking with the plan of "if you loose picks (BM) you better somehow get them back" theory. Count on it.

AZStryker
04-24-2012, 07:10 PM
LOL matt ryan actually started the year he came out and how can you compare the 2? Tannehill won't start until at least 2 years but he can be a good slot receiver for the Browns.

You said 15 int's was a lot. I was just explaining Matt Ryan threw a lot more and he's the golden child for a lot of people around here. Plus, it's not certain how far away Tanny is, but it certainly isn't 2 years!!!

j-off-her-doll
04-24-2012, 07:25 PM
60

rcasellas64
04-24-2012, 07:29 PM
I believe its going to be 100%...No doubt. I see right though the smoke screen. So much misinformation. But in the end, we will draft Tannehill.

SebasMiamiFan
04-24-2012, 07:36 PM
33%

SnakeoilSeller
04-24-2012, 07:36 PM
I am going to say 35%, but tomorrow I may say 50%, and by Thursday I could be at 10%?????

BillsFanInPeace
04-24-2012, 07:44 PM
I will say the Buzz in Buffalo is if you all pass on Tannehill he will be a Buffalo Bill.

PlexGod
04-24-2012, 07:54 PM
75-80 % we draft him.... the other 20-25% is either a DE or OT

oasis
04-24-2012, 07:56 PM
25%

Predaphin
04-24-2012, 07:58 PM
30%

It comes down to Sherman's input

DphinBillkiller
04-24-2012, 07:59 PM
47 percent chance

SCall13
04-24-2012, 08:02 PM
5%

AZStryker
04-24-2012, 08:16 PM
5%

Wishful thinking, though I don't know why.

Scaryfoo
04-24-2012, 08:17 PM
65%

LikeUntoGod
04-24-2012, 08:19 PM
34.8

madcatz54zt
04-24-2012, 08:33 PM
about 25%

OrlandoFin
04-24-2012, 08:46 PM
I will say the Buzz in Buffalo is if you all pass on Tannehill he will be a Buffalo Bill.

That is because I think Buffalo want Mark Barron and I think they are trying to keep Miami from trading out of 8 to a team like Dallas who would jump up there and take him.

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 08:53 PM
Wishful thinking, though I don't know why.

How is your 99.9% and ross making the call not wishful thinking?

josekareh
04-24-2012, 08:55 PM
60%

PyroDOLFAN
04-24-2012, 08:55 PM
At 8 is 10%

If we trade down that is another story, but if there is something Ireland will not do...its reach for a pick. And Tanny at 8 is most definitely a reach.

BillsFanInPeace
04-24-2012, 08:56 PM
That is because I think Buffalo want Mark Barron and I think they are trying to keep Miami from trading out of 8 to a team like Dallas who would jump up there and take him.

I would love Mark Barron as well. Man to have Jarius Byrd and Mark Barron as the safeties will be sick back there.

elite14eva
04-24-2012, 08:59 PM
50%....i hope we trade down for more picks, we got alotta holes to fill.

yardlaw
04-24-2012, 09:01 PM
0%, we'll trade out of the spot if a trade partner is found, or select a defensive player

OrlandoFin
04-24-2012, 09:05 PM
I would love Mark Barron as well. Man to have Jarius Byrd and Mark Barron as the safeties will be sick back there.

For that same reason I would hate to see you guys get him. I like Barron a lot heck he may be my favorite player in the draft.

retarmyfinfan
04-24-2012, 09:06 PM
10%

WaxOn WaxOff
04-24-2012, 09:12 PM
90%. Why else would we feign interest in others, why would come out to strongly deny that the owner wants Tannehill?

AZStryker
04-24-2012, 09:19 PM
How is your 99.9% and ross making the call not wishful thinking?

Whether I want Tannehill or not isn't the question. My reasoning for the percentage was within the text that followed.

And don't be that guy. You know the guy who had someone disagree with him and now has to follow them and try to nit pick.

MDphinfan02
04-24-2012, 09:21 PM
100

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 09:25 PM
Whether I want Tannehill or not isn't the question. My reasoning for the percentage was within the text that followed.

And don't be that guy. You know the guy who had someone disagree with him and now has to follow them and try to nit pick.


Where did you disagree with me I never mentioned 15 INT was a lot all I said the Ryan and Tannehill comparison was ridiculous

KTOWNFINFAN
04-24-2012, 09:30 PM
90%. Why else would we feign interest in others, why would come out to strongly deny that the owner wants Tannehill?

AHH, see that is what I was thinking also. See it doesn't make sense any other way. Think about it, Ross already knows who the fins are planning on taking, so if they WEREN'T planning on taking Tannehill, he would just keep quiet and let those idiots at ESPN keep chattering about how he was going to pull the strings and make Tannehill the pick. Then afterwards he would say, see your morons know NOTHING. But NO, he gets offended and has to point out that he has nothing to do with the pick. The one thing he DOESN'T want is for them to draft Tannehill at #8 and Tannehill turns out to be a bust, with people thinking HE was the one who pulled the trigger. He would NEVER be able to hire another GM worth a crap.

Not saying it is 100% that this proves we are taking Tannehill, but I can't see him rushing in to call ESPN and tell them he had nothing to do with who they picked if they had no plans on drafting Tannehill. False information is what you want, so why would you take the time to set them straight?? Doesn't add up. I also bet he made this call before discussing it with everyone. Just an opinion.

KTOWNFINFAN
04-24-2012, 09:32 PM
before Ross made the call to ESPN I would have said 10% that we draft Tannehill at 8. Now I say 70% maybe even 80%.

PJack
04-24-2012, 09:39 PM
75%. Not thrilled by it either unless we trade down to 12-14 and pick up another 2nd rounder.

Cole Hbr finfan
04-24-2012, 09:52 PM
0%

enduro
04-24-2012, 09:54 PM
just wondering what everyones % is when it comes to miami drafting Tannenhill at # 8
very simple and to the point ?

50% at #7 and 50% at #8

RockyMtnPhinfan
04-24-2012, 09:55 PM
20%

frb86
04-24-2012, 10:02 PM
5% I don't think Ireland would pick him that high, I hope he will pick his highest rated de/olb and double down on the position later also

DFINS#1
04-24-2012, 10:09 PM
40% he has talent but do not think he is worth being the #8 darft pick hope to see them trade down get extra draft pcik

hooshoops
04-24-2012, 10:15 PM
i've never wavered...not gonna start now...75% at #8...the other 25% we take him somewhere else

phintim
04-24-2012, 10:50 PM
I was at about 15 percent chance that we would take him basically if we traded back and he was still available but after watching a vidio of him now I will say 40%. Its all based on what Sherman beilieves IMO he just lost his last job with the kid at QB so he certainly will not endorse him if he thinks he will loose another one. If Tannehill was all world we probably not have Sherman. Really it does not make sense logically that a fired college coach is going to be our offensive coodinator especially if his QB in college is a top 10 NFL QB. Two things are obvious here either Sherman is not very good or Tannehill is not that great of QB. Hopefully I am wrong on both counts as we already have Sherman on board and we are in a position to draft Tannhill. Interesting


According to Parcells’ board Texas A&M quarterback Ryan Tannehill has a late first-round grade. He’s the third best quarterback in the draft, behind Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III.
Arizona State quarterback Brock Osweiler is the fourth best quarterback on his board, and Parcells has a late second-round grade on him. Michigan State quarterback Kirk Cousins also has a late second-round grade.
Parcells has Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden with a mid-third round grade, and he’s the final quarterback on the Draft Confidential board.
From the receiver standpoint, I found it VERY interesting that

NWFinFan
04-24-2012, 11:04 PM
Less than 10%.

TheWarriorFins
04-24-2012, 11:21 PM
I was at about 15 percent chance that we would take him basically if we traded back and he was still available but after watching a vidio of him now I will say 40%. Its all based on what Sherman beilieves IMO he just lost his last job with the kid at QB so he certainly will not endorse him if he thinks he will loose another one. If Tannehill was all world we probably not have Sherman. Really it does not make sense logically that a fired college coach is going to be our offensive coodinator especially if his QB in college is a top 10 NFL QB. Two things are obvious here either Sherman is not very good or Tannehill is not that great of QB. Hopefully I am wrong on both counts as we already have Sherman on board and we are in a position to draft Tannhill. Interesting


According to Parcells’ board Texas A&M quarterback Ryan Tannehill has a late first-round grade. He’s the third best quarterback in the draft, behind Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III.
Arizona State quarterback Brock Osweiler is the fourth best quarterback on his board, and Parcells has a late second-round grade on him. Michigan State quarterback Kirk Cousins also has a late second-round grade.
Parcells has Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden with a mid-third round grade, and he’s the final quarterback on the Draft Confidential board.
From the receiver standpoint, I found it VERY interesting that

I just saw the draft special too although polian looks at it as a big gamble and he doesn't see any resamblance to a a pro nfl QB and Tannehill does contradict Parcells Draft QB Requirements. Osweiler is interesting didn't we meet with him once?

cltchperf
04-25-2012, 12:07 AM
I really hope miami doesn't take tannehill at #8. It just worries me when a qb for most of the year is or has been seen as an early 2nd round talent has been jumped up to be picked in the top 10 not because he is a that caliber of qb, but because of necessity. A lot of times you see qbs stock jump up like that, those are ones you usually see that become busts. Even the first pick ones, some became no.1 picks because of being un such a weak qb draft class. He's getting so much attention because of his athleticism and strong arm, but so many quarterbacks have been busts, when looking at just those aspects. There's so much more to it, and his accuracy or what I've seen inconsistent accuracy and him being a project worries me and accuracy is such an important thing for a franchise qb. I mean that was one of chad henne's issues, we don't need another qb with henne like accuracy do we?.

It seems like I would try trading down and if they can't then pick bpa and then early second round maybe get brock or weeden. So atleast so much stock isnt tied up to them, but they could develop and possibly be somethuing while possibly drafting a top qb next season if miami sucks. If miami gets tannehill they are forging getting a better prospect next season, while holding all there cards on a project, which you don't usually get qb projects as high as the top 10, but miami might because of necessity. I hope they don't though as for the reasons stated.

cltchperf
04-25-2012, 12:13 AM
According to Parcells’ board Texas A&M quarterback Ryan Tannehill has a late first-round grade. He’s the third best quarterback in the draft, behind Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III.
Arizona State quarterback Brock Osweiler is the fourth best quarterback on his board, and Parcells has a late second-round grade on him. Michigan State quarterback Kirk Cousins also has a late second-round grade.
Parcells has Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden with a mid-third round grade, and he’s the final quarterback on the Draft Confidential board.
From the receiver standpoint, I found it VERY interesting that

Yep, this is what I saw too and I also felt after reading about him that miami should not and I do not take him at no.8 and trade down or pick best player available there instead and get a qb early 2nd round instead in that case

tcdrover
04-25-2012, 12:14 AM
I'd say it is 75% that we take him.

100% if he is there, he might not be there. They don't want to trade up for him probably & they don't want to admit they wanted him if he gets picked before we draft.

SSDD, every coaching staff and GM is the same. They all want to pretend that they got exactly what they wanted afterwards.

MadDog 88
04-25-2012, 04:39 AM
90%. He has to much potential for a team as desperately in need of a future QB as the Dolphins are, for the pick to be anyone but Tannehill.

I'll go 50% that rounds 2-4 are a DE and 2 WRs.


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?jatyhr

JCane
04-25-2012, 04:48 AM
100%

TheWalrus
04-25-2012, 04:50 AM
I would have pegged it at 60% before all the leaks about Tannehill falling or us not taking him. Now I'd put it at more like 80%. It's still way out of character for Jeff Ireland, but after a while it's hard not to give in to the signs.

Unlike MadDog88, I think the immediate emphasis after that will be on offensive linemen. People look at Joe Philbin and see the former coordinator of a high flying offense. I look at Joe Philbin and see a former offensive line coach who knows we can't pass protect. I'm honestly still baffled why they didn't find a way to make room for Eric Winston. He's an elite ZBS RT in a league with few of those.

I'd personally rather they take a shot on greatness with Bruce Irvin, but I think it'll be a tackle. A DE (or some kind of pass rusher) and WR in round three sound right, though I would honestly not be surprised if they didn't take a WR until the later rounds, preferring another OL.

dovershores
04-25-2012, 11:35 AM
To me its 50%, and I really can't tell if the FO wants Tannehill or not but I suppose its just part of the whole smoke and mirrors thing

2413fanphins
04-25-2012, 06:41 PM
33%

dolfan91
04-25-2012, 07:11 PM
After listening to Lombardi, Casserly and Sundquist on NFLN tonight, I'm convinced Tannehill WON'T be the pick at #8. I'm going to predict Ireland will select Fletcher Cox. after hearing their reasoning to not take Tannehill; I think the smoke screen all along has been Tannehill to hide their affection for Cox's athleticism and versatility. Just my opinion, but I'm more convinced now, than I was earlier in the week; couple that with the release of Merling leaving room for another D-lineman to be selected early!!!

Blake the great
04-25-2012, 07:39 PM
50% of the time, we draft Tannehill every time.

good call Brian Fantana from Anchorman :lol:

But I think its about 65% chance the fins draft Tannehill

chilenodolfan
04-25-2012, 07:47 PM
68%

TheBow305
04-25-2012, 08:09 PM
50% Tannehill, 50% Coples

cuban_refugee
04-25-2012, 09:12 PM
13% - Dan Marino makes the calls here

I like your Mock......We may just draft one of the top tier pass rushers as the first pick......if Tannehill slides by Seattle and KC, then there is a strong possibility we trade back into the 1st Rd to get him.

fishbanger
04-25-2012, 11:26 PM
50% because Ireland is drafting and probably has 3 year starter on his value chart which means Cousins for him. Cousins may be gone by time we pick in the second round.

iwastherein72
04-26-2012, 12:15 AM
According to Parcells’ board Texas A&M quarterback Ryan Tannehill has a late first-round grade. He’s the third best quarterback in the draft, behind Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III.
Arizona State quarterback Brock Osweiler is the fourth best quarterback on his board, and Parcells has a late second-round grade on him. Michigan State quarterback Kirk Cousins also has a late second-round grade.
Parcells has Oklahoma State quarterback Brandon Weeden with a mid-third round grade, and he’s the final quarterback on the Draft Confidential board.


Parcells' board... LOL. What is THAT worth?

iwastherein72
04-26-2012, 12:23 AM
It seems like I would try trading down and if they can't then pick bpa and then early second round maybe get brock or weeden. So atleast so much stock isnt tied up to them, but they could develop and possibly be somethuing while possibly drafting a top qb next season if miami sucks. If miami gets tannehill they are forging getting a better prospect next season, while holding all there cards on a project, which you don't usually get qb projects as high as the top 10, but miami might because of necessity. I hope they don't though as for the reasons stated.

So flawed.

1. Tannehill has an ASTRONOMICALLY higher chance of being a star than osweiler according to the whole football world. The numbers are so much against this that it boggles the mind. osweiler has 3-Year Career Backup and/or Camp Arm written all over him. weeden has Chris Weinke written all over him.

2. We DO NOT FORGO drafting a QB in '13 if we get Tannehill. NOT AT ALL. Quote me the law that says we can't do it again if we HAVE to.

robert l
04-26-2012, 12:38 AM
95%

BESS4LAST
04-26-2012, 01:07 AM
Then we absolutely 100% PASS!!!

t_fins
04-26-2012, 09:18 AM
51%