PDA

View Full Version : Catholics Sue Obama On Birth Control Mandate



BAMAPHIN 22
05-21-2012, 04:31 PM
Dozens of Roman Catholic dioceses, schools and other institutions sued the Obama administration Monday over a government mandate requiring most employers to provide birth control coverage as part of their employee health plans....Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/catholics-sue-obama-birth-control-mandate-article-1.1081944#ixzz1vXQdFvvO

Vaark
05-22-2012, 10:10 AM
Well duh, obviously it's in their best interest: More birth control = fewer boys to molest.!!

It's nice that they took time out from the logistics of reassigning their many pedophile priests so they can prey, unannounced and undetected on other innocent alter boys before the Pedo Police can catch up with them.

Dolphins9954
05-22-2012, 11:10 AM
Gay marriage and birth control?!?!?!

Another election that fails to address the REAL ISSUES facing the nation. Quote from Jesus "What a crock of ****."

LANGER72
05-22-2012, 11:47 AM
Their objection to the mandate is completely understandable.
The catholic church needs to rid itself of the homosexual pedophile priests and stop protecting them.
Anyone who abuses children should be locked up ..removed from society. Putting these pathetic humans in the penal system would be just punishment.

LANGER72
05-22-2012, 11:51 AM
:abduction:

Gonzo
05-22-2012, 02:37 PM
Their objection to the mandate is completely understandable.
The catholic church needs to rid itself of the homosexual pedophile priests and stop protecting them.
Anyone who abuses children should be locked up ..removed from society. Putting these pathetic humans in the penal system would be just punishment.

I see what you did there. And here we go on a troll-injected tangent. You equate pedophilia to homosexuality. I equate pedophilia to religious institutions. I also equate war, hatred, and oppression to the latter. But homosexuality is the problem... :lol:

Your post fit right in with what 9954 was talking about. Distract from the issues that actually matter with idiotic nonsense like banning gay marriage and paying for birth control and the truly asinine equating of homosexuality to pedophilia. Social conservatives are the biggest enemy to the Republican party, because they are going to ensure Obama gets reelected.

Tetragrammaton
05-22-2012, 02:44 PM
Gay marriage and birth control?!?!?!

Another election that fails to address the REAL ISSUES facing the nation. Quote from Jesus "What a crock of ****."

You always remind us that the two parties are identical on the economy and war. So, then, what real issues would you want them to talk about?

phinfan3411
05-22-2012, 03:05 PM
You always remind us that the two parties are identical on the economy and war. So, then, what real issues would you want them to talk about?

I think he means address, not talk about, and i agree with him.

These topics are basically used for cover to keep either party from talking about or addressing the much more pressing issues facing us.

phinfan3411
05-22-2012, 03:17 PM
I see what you did there. And here we go on a troll-injected tangent. You equate pedophilia to homosexuality. I equate pedophilia to religious institutions. I also equate war, hatred, and oppression to the latter. But homosexuality is the problem... :lol:

Your post fit right in with what 9954 was talking about. Distract from the issues that actually matter with idiotic nonsense like gay marriage and birth control and the truly asinine equating homosexuality to pedophilia. Social conservatives are the biggest enemy to the Republican party, because they are going to ensure Obama gets reelected.

I would have to agree, i have known a few gay people in my life, and even though i could be mistaken, i do not believe homosexuality to be linked to pedophilia.

This is another reason, as i have gotten a little older, i feel religion is for the birds.

I doubt that people like that even care, but i am fairly active on a few political boards, and i continuously see these supposedly highly religious people saying the worst things imaginable about homosexuals. Yeah, you are really doing the Lord's work there guys, makes me sick, makes me want to run right out and find a church for my family to go to...

I firmly believe people are born that way, they do NOT choose it. You cannot change who you are attracted to, so it makes sense to me to treat these people exactly the same as anyone else, with the same rights as anyone else.

Gonzo
05-22-2012, 03:23 PM
I would have to agree, i have known a few gay people in my life, and even though i could be mistaken, i do not believe homosexuality to be linked to pedophilia.

This is another reason, as i have gotten a little older, i feel religion is for the birds.

I doubt that people like that even care, but i am fairly active on a few political boards, and i continuously see these supposedly highly religious people saying the worst things imaginable about homosexuals. Yeah, you are really doing the Lord's work there guys, makes me sick, makes me want to run right out and find a church for my family to go to...

I firmly believe people are born that way, they do NOT choose it. You cannot change who you are attracted to, so it makes sense to me to treat these people exactly the same as anyone else, with the same rights as anyone else.Funny, right after I read this thread, I came across this:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/pastor-delivers-anti-gay-rant-suggests-building-electric-142753831.html

jared81
05-22-2012, 07:04 PM
if obama had a son, he would be molested by a catholic priest.

LANGER72
05-22-2012, 07:20 PM
I see what you did there. And here we go on a troll-injected tangent. You equate pedophilia to homosexuality. I equate pedophilia to religious institutions. I also equate war, hatred, and oppression to the latter. But homosexuality is the problem... :lol:

Your post fit right in with what 9954 was talking about. Distract from the issues that actually matter with idiotic nonsense like banning gay marriage and paying for birth control and the truly asinine equating of homosexuality to pedophilia. Social conservatives are the biggest enemy to the Republican party, because they are going to ensure Obama gets reelected.

Just calling a spad a spad.
IMHO.. if the priest is a man, and the abused child is a boy, I would categorize the Priest as gay pedophile.
If the male priest abuses a girl, he is simply a pedophile.
If there was a female priest and she abused a female girl, I would categorize her as a gay pedophile.
Understand?
Sorry to ruffle your feathers.

Social conservatives a just a small part of the majority that will boot your president out of office.

LANGER72
05-22-2012, 07:25 PM
if obama had a son, he'd would be molested by a catholic priest.

You forgot to add "drunken Irish"

Dolphins9954
05-22-2012, 07:30 PM
You always remind us that the two parties are identical on the economy and war. So, then, what real issues would you want them to talk about?

NDAA, Patriot Act, "Anti-Protest" bill HR. 347, Habaes Corpus, Torture, Indefinite Detention, Preventive Detention, GITMO, Warrantless Searches, The 4th Amendment in general, Hell all the amendments, Assassinations, Foreign Policy, Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, The Federal Reserve, Bailouts, The Wall Street Money Train funding both candidates, The Military Industrial Complex, The War On Drugs......Just to name a few.

Unfortunately both candidates believe government trumps liberty and don't offer much difference besides the classic wedge issues that come up ever 4 years. It's all a charade really. It's just funny to me watching most Obama supporters remain totally silent when he continued and expanded most of Bush's attacks on our liberty. But all Obama has to say is gay marriage and birth control and Obama is a defender of liberty and civil rights. The man is the biggest threat to freedom since Bush no matter how many happy gay people and birth control there is in our country.

Tetragrammaton
05-22-2012, 10:36 PM
your president

If you aren't an American, why are you so invested in our domestic affairs?

Tetragrammaton
05-22-2012, 10:40 PM
NDAA, Patriot Act, "Anti-Protest" bill HR. 347, Habaes Corpus, Torture, Indefinite Detention, Preventive Detention, GITMO, Warrantless Searches, The 4th Amendment in general, Hell all the amendments, Assassinations, Foreign Policy, Monetary Policy, Fiscal Policy, The Federal Reserve, Bailouts, The Wall Street Money Train funding both candidates, The Military Industrial Complex, The War On Drugs......Just to name a few.

Unfortunately both candidates believe government trumps liberty and don't offer much difference besides the classic wedge issues that come up ever 4 years. It's all a charade really. It's just funny to me watching most Obama supporters remain totally silent when he continued and expanded most of Bush's attacks on our liberty. But all Obama has to say is gay marriage and birth control and Obama is a defender of liberty and civil rights. The man is the biggest threat to freedom since Bush no matter how many happy gay people and birth control there is in our country.

Relativity has to come into play. You say they are the same on all those issues, and you are right, but that is why the few differences that are present are so pertinent.

Dolphins9954
05-23-2012, 12:01 AM
Relativity has to come into play. You say they are the same on all those issues, and you are right, but that is why the few differences that are present are so pertinent.

Douchebag or Terd Sandwich that's really what it is. The few differences get all the attention to hide the fact that the whole thing is a big racket.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 08:32 AM
If you aren't an American, why are you so invested in our domestic affairs?




I am American and I vote in every election. I chose my candidate from the two major parties so my vote actually helps decide the issue. The concept of protest voting is just a bunch of hippee anti-establishment circle jerking.
I did not believe the hype and change and voted for the crusty old war veteran. The old buzzard would have done better IMHO. The inhaling, "present" in the senate, welfare organizer has really made a bigger mess of the country. I have no attachment to his party in it's current socialist manifestations or the man on the high horse who is a fraud.
He is the president of the US, but he was not my choice...hence not my president.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 08:41 AM
Douchebag or Terd Sandwich that's really what it is. The few differences get all the attention to hide the fact that the whole thing is a big racket.


Romney will be different. He will have beautiful wives in each of the white house bedrooms...lol
We really should consider voting for a Amish candidate...
Seriously though, removing the anus that extrudes the Chicago mob influence out of the government will be a step in the right direction.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 08:45 AM
Relativity has to come into play. You say they are the same on all those issues, and you are right, but that is why the few differences that are present are so pertinent.

I believe there are more than a few differences. Painting them the same color is very clever innuendo.

Vaark
05-23-2012, 11:26 AM
Romney will be different. He will have beautiful wives in each of the white house bedrooms...lol
We really should consider voting for a Amish candidate...
Seriously though, removing the anus that extrudes the Chicago mob influence out of the government will be a step in the right direction.

Well, I think you're assuming too much considering arguably the worst president/marionette and his treasonous, crooked puppet master both in the pockets of Saudi oil and NeoCon globalists actually did get "elected in 2008." (I'd say "re-elected" but for the fact that they stole the election from Gore with the happy assistance of Supreme Court disgrace Scalia.)

The sheep quotient is pretty predictable so who knows? :idk:

Dolphins9954
05-23-2012, 12:16 PM
Romney will be different. He will have beautiful wives in each of the white house bedrooms...lol
We really should consider voting for a Amish candidate...
Seriously though, removing the anus that extrudes the Chicago mob influence out of the government will be a step in the right direction.

Romney is controlled by the same mob. Both these guys got so much Wall Street and Bank money it's ridiculous. The Health Insurance and Drug companies love both these guys too. Not to mention the MIC and the Prison Industrial Complex as well. These 2 guys will sell out quicker than flies on sh**. Things like Birth Control, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Trayvon, The neverending death of Whitney Houston and Minecraft:) will flood the media like Noah's Ark from now till the election. Creating this illusion of choice by extremely highlighting the very few differences these candidate have, while totally ignoring the vast similarities in their policies. Policies that have far more negative impact on all of our daily lives. Smoke and mirrors.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 06:08 PM
Romney is controlled by the same mob. Both these guys got so much Wall Street and Bank money it's ridiculous. The Health Insurance and Drug companies love both these guys too. Not to mention the MIC and the Prison Industrial Complex as well. These 2 guys will sell out quicker than flies on sh**. Things like Birth Control, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Trayvon, The neverending death of Whitney Houston and Minecraft:) will flood the media like Noah's Ark from now till the election. Creating this illusion of choice by extremely highlighting the very few differences these candidate have, while totally ignoring the vast similarities in their policies. Policies that have far more negative impact on all of our daily lives. Smoke and mirrors.

I still have a little bit of faith. Romney deserves his chance before he is criticized.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 06:18 PM
Well, I think you're assuming too much considering arguably the worst president/marionette and his treasonous, crooked puppet master both in the pockets of Saudi oil and NeoCon globalists actually did get "elected in 2008." (I'd say "re-elected" but for the fact that they stole the election from Gore with the happy assistance of Supreme Court disgrace Scalia.)

The sheep quotient is pretty predictable so who knows? :idk:


Could you imagine the state the world if Gore was elected? That could take a whole thread.

Once government is scaled back, and the profiteering taken out of the game, it will restore more faith.
The money is almost gone(debt tipping point)...the US financial carcass is almost picked clean. In a few more years, or sooner, there will be major changes IMHO.
NeoCon(your term) capitalist globalists or Socialist/Marxist Globalists...pick your poison. There is no in between.

tylerdolphin
05-23-2012, 06:21 PM
I am American and I vote in every election. I chose my candidate from the two major parties so my vote actually helps decide the issue. The concept of protest voting is just a bunch of hippee anti-establishment circle jerking.

I disagree. Vote your conscience. My country very recently had elections and I voted for a party that I knew damn well wasnt going to win. The reason things are so ****ed up now is because people often dot vote their conscience for various reasons (family, ignorance, belief the candidate has no shot, ect.).

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 08:58 PM
I disagree. Vote your conscience. My country very recently had elections and I voted for a party that I knew damn well wasnt going to win. The reason things are so ****ed up now is because people often dot vote their conscience for various reasons (family, ignorance, belief the candidate has no shot, ect.).

Even in a country as big as the USA, every vote can count big time. The margin of victory in the Bush/Gore election was less than 1000 votes in the state of Florida. The winner got the electoral college votes to win the national election. To just cast your vote for a candidate that has no shot may be a moral victory or a protest vote, but really it has big implications..especially in Florida.
IMHO..you can vote for your favorite in the primaries, then you get down to business of picking the lesser of the two evils in the presidential election. Just my .02

Tetragrammaton
05-23-2012, 09:00 PM
Even in a country as big as the USA, every vote can count big time. The margin of victory in the Bush/Gore election was less than 1000 votes in the state of Florida. The winner got the electoral college votes to win the national election. To just cast your vote for a candidate that has no shot may be a moral victory or a protest vote, but really it has big implications..especially in Florida.
IMHO..you can vote for your favorite in the primaries, then you get down to business of picking the lesser of the two evils in the presidential election. Just my .02

The 537 vote difference in Florida is still a lot more than one vote. All individual voting is essentially meaningless, whether it is for a major or minor candidate.

LANGER72
05-23-2012, 09:07 PM
The 537 vote difference in Florida is still a lot more than one vote. All individual voting is essentially meaningless, whether it is for a major or minor candidate.

Says you.
If 9 people per county voted in protest, it handed Bush the election.

Tetragrammaton
05-23-2012, 09:12 PM
Says you.
If 9 people per county voted in protest, it handed Bush the election.

What does that prove? Each person is an individual. How you vote or how rob19 votes doesn't affect how they vote.

greenrules008
05-23-2012, 09:59 PM
may the catholics be victorious over the dreaded forces of communism, like john paul against the iron curtain. HA! HA! HA! HA!

tylerdolphin
05-23-2012, 11:28 PM
Even in a country as big as the USA, every vote can count big time. The margin of victory in the Bush/Gore election was less than 1000 votes in the state of Florida. The winner got the electoral college votes to win the national election. To just cast your vote for a candidate that has no shot may be a moral victory or a protest vote, but really it has big implications..especially in Florida.
IMHO..you can vote for your favorite in the primaries, then you get down to business of picking the lesser of the two evils in the presidential election. Just my .02

Its even more magnified where I voted...there were multiple seats in this country decided by less than 30 votes and one decided by 4. My particular seat only has like 3,000 registered voters give or take and the winning candidate won by 101. Still doesnt stop me from voting for the best man for the job in my eyes. Im not gonna vote for garbage just because. Like I said, thats why things are so ****ed up now.

LANGER72
05-24-2012, 10:28 AM
What does that prove? Each person is an individual. How you vote or how rob19 votes doesn't affect how they vote.

What does voting for a candidate that has zero chance to win..out of "protest" "prove" ?
Sheesh. I am off this Merry go Round.

Tetragrammaton
05-24-2012, 10:38 AM
What does voting for a candidate that has zero chance to win..out of "protest" "prove" ?
Sheesh. I am off this Merry go Round.

It proves you voted for who you wanted to win. Voting for the major party candidates because they are more likely to win is statistically irrelevant.

Vaark
05-24-2012, 10:46 AM
Back in the 80s I farmed out the artwork for a white Tee shirt with a simulated presidential ballot listing the 3 main candidates (you can figure out who) with a small box to the left of each name and then a "Vote For None Of The Above" choice with a big red checkmark in that corresponding box. Had them produced in a SF valley sweat shop to order and sold them mail order in 1/16-1/8page display ads in a number of 2nd tier market newspapers like KC and Indy which were a lot more affordable than say the SF Chronicle, LA Times or Chicago Tribune. Happened to end up doing very well with that little venture :up:

With this technology, production economies of scale, social media outreach etc, and in consideration of the dreck we're gonna have to select from, perhaps I should encourage my son to mount a variation of that venture. Personally, that's the way I feel and in principle, am as likely to write in Rob19 on the Hemp Ticket as I am any other of those bozos :idk:

Gonzo
05-24-2012, 03:59 PM
Just calling a spad a spad.
IMHO.. if the priest is a man, and the abused child is a boy, I would categorize the Priest as gay pedophile.
If the male priest abuses a girl, he is simply a pedophile.
If there was a female priest and she abused a female girl, I would categorize her as a gay pedophile.
Understand?
Sorry to ruffle your feathers.

Social conservatives a just a small part of the majority that will boot your president out of office.Calling a spade a spade would be calling a pedophile a pedophile. That's where it ends. Throwing anything before it is simply a backhanded and cowardly way of linking the two. Let's not pretend it wasn't your intention. Calling them a gay pedophile is no more accurate than calling them christian pedophiles, considering nothing about what they are doing is gay or christian. It's pedophilia and in no way linked to either. Period.

Social conservatives are nut jobs that are only mildly better than very socially conservative terrorists (wow, it's kinda fun making baseless comparisons. I see why you're drawn to doing it). If Republicans focused strictly on the economy, smaller government, and jobs; they'd have mine and many other independents' votes. But they won't. They'll cater to the nutjobs. And they will lose because of it. Either way, the country will lose.

And he's your president too, despite the fact that neither of us voted for him :up:

LANGER72
05-24-2012, 08:19 PM
Calling a spade a spade would be calling a pedophile a pedophile. That's where it ends. Throwing anything before it is simply a backhanded and cowardly way of linking the two. Let's not pretend it wasn't your intention. Calling them a gay pedophile is no more accurate than calling them christian pedophiles, considering nothing about what they are doing is gay or christian. It's pedophilia and in no way linked to either. Period.

Social conservatives are nut jobs that are only mildly better than very socially conservative terrorists (wow, it's kinda fun making baseless comparisons. I see why you're drawn to doing it). If Republicans focused strictly on the economy, smaller government, and jobs; they'd have mine and many other independents' votes. But they won't. They'll cater to the nutjobs. And they will lose because of it. Either way, the country will lose.

And he's your president too, despite the fact that neither of us voted for him :up:

My comment is neither back handed or cowardly. I stand by my comments and interpretation. You are entitled to your own opinion.

Nutjobs? This forum has more fruity flavors than a box of fruit loops. How is that for a baseless comparison.


It is still amazes me how the Democratic party and some independents were fooled by the messiah. Although he is the president, I am counting down the days left in his term.

Spad? LOL...you got me there. I don't normally use that word, so I just forgot how to spell it.

Peace..:up:

Vaark
05-25-2012, 03:47 PM
IMO, pedophilia is a perversion whereas being straight or gay is more a of a genetic roll of the dice. If you are sexually attracted to children, you're ****ing sick and fall into your own classification. Makes no difference if you molest boys or girls..you're a sick ****. If you really want to classify one of those sick ****s who likes boys, label them a "pedarast" which is a very specific designation involving boy anal contact. Gays and straights practice what for them is normal age-appropriate consensual sex (whether you agree with "normal" or not) where no one is exploited. That is a world apart from what pedophiles do.

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/06/jaysus-1.gif

LANGER72
05-25-2012, 06:24 PM
IMO, pedophilia is a perversion whereas being straight or gay is more a of a genetic roll of the dice. If you are sexually attracted to children, you're ****ing sick and fall into your own classification. Makes no difference if you molest boys or girls..you're a sick ****. If you really want to classify one of those sick ****s who likes boys, label them a "pedarast" which is a very specific designation involving boy anal contact. Gays and straights practice what for them is normal age-appropriate consensual sex (whether you agree with "normal" or not) where no one is exploited. That is a world apart from what pedophiles do.

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/06/jaysus-1.gif

I find your switch quite offensive.

jguig
05-30-2012, 11:12 PM
IMO, pedophilia is a perversion whereas being straight or gay is more a of a genetic roll of the dice. If you are sexually attracted to children, you're ****ing sick and fall into your own classification. Makes no difference if you molest boys or girls..you're a sick ****. If you really want to classify one of those sick ****s who likes boys, label them a "pedarast" which is a very specific designation involving boy anal contact. Gays and straights practice what for them is normal age-appropriate consensual sex (whether you agree with "normal" or not) where no one is exploited. That is a world apart from what pedophiles do.

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/06/jaysus-1.gif



*********************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ***************

How is this not a TOS violation??? This is insanely offensive.

phins_4_ever
05-31-2012, 12:46 PM
I am American and I vote in every election. I chose my candidate from the two major parties so my vote actually helps decide the issue. The concept of protest voting is just a bunch of hippee anti-establishment circle jerking.
I did not believe the hype and change and voted for the crusty old war veteran. The old buzzard would have done better IMHO. The inhaling, "present" in the senate, welfare organizer has really made a bigger mess of the country. I have no attachment to his party in it's current socialist manifestations or the man on the high horse who is a fraud.
He is the president of the US, but he was not my choice...hence not my president.

Oh what a sad, pathetic statement from a true patriot eh?

If you are a US citizens or legal permannent resident then the elected President is your president just as well. If you voted for him or not is secondary.

phins_4_ever
05-31-2012, 12:52 PM
I find your switch quite offensive.

I like the switch.

phins_4_ever
05-31-2012, 12:54 PM
*********************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ************************************MODERATORS ***************

How is this not a TOS violation??? This is insanely offensive.

It's not a TOS violation. Unless you don't believe in Jesus Christ.

It is a light switch where the cover is made of two kids and a Jesus watching over them. Unfortunately the switch itself is broken and loose. I think someone needs to fix it before someone gets hurt.

Not sure what else you all see.

jguig
06-03-2012, 11:42 PM
It's not a TOS violation. Unless you don't believe in Jesus Christ.

It is a light switch where the cover is made of two kids and a Jesus watching over them. Unfortunately the switch itself is broken and loose. I think someone needs to fix it before someone gets hurt.

Not sure what else you all see.


How sad. What a statement about YOU ! If you are that insensitive to other people, you are lacking a moral compass, compassion, and basic human dignity.

phins_4_ever
06-04-2012, 12:34 AM
How sad. What a statement about YOU ! If you are that insensitive to other people, you are lacking a moral compass, compassion, and basic human dignity.

The lack of humor within religious circles is absolutely stunning. Which goes with the freedom to express yourself as well. Only religious people are allowed to make jokes and express themselves. Goes quite well with a dictator like leadership booklet called the Bible. :lol:

CedarPhin
06-04-2012, 03:01 AM
What will we do when the Pope already owns 51% of General Motors? I'd say the stock exchange is all he's really qualified to quote us.

Vaark
06-04-2012, 09:19 AM
How sad. What a statement about YOU ! If you are that insensitive to other people, you are lacking a moral compass, compassion, and basic human dignity.

So i guess you're not a father of one of the literally tens of thousands of kids worldwide whose innocence was forever ruined and outlook corrupted by the many generations of literally thousands of scumbag predatory pedo priest worldwide who the Catholic Church protected, enabled and clandestinely reassigned before the **** hit the fan so they could continue molesting new generations of unsuspecting, trusting children, eh? Too bad...you might have had more moral outrage if that was the case instead of needing to flush your nether regions :idk:

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/06/PedoPriest_2-1.jpg

LANGER72
06-04-2012, 10:40 AM
It's not a TOS violation. Unless you don't believe in Jesus Christ.

It is a light switch where the cover is made of two kids and a Jesus watching over them. Unfortunately the switch itself is broken and loose. I think someone needs to fix it before someone gets hurt.

Not sure what else you all see.

The switch is not broken...your sense of decency is.
It is portrayed as some type of sick glory hole with Jesus Christ offering himself to 2 small children. It is highly objectionable.
You should have used the aardvark instead of Christ..it would be equally sick and perverted but it would make perfect sense to me.

Vaark
06-04-2012, 11:02 AM
The switch is not broken...your sense of decency is.
It is portrayed as some type of sick glory hole with Jesus Christ offering himself to 2 small children. It is highly objectionable.
You should have used the aardvark instead of Christ..it would be equally sick and perverted but it would make perfect sense to me.

you sound butt-hurt, literally. Were you by any chance an alter boy?

LANGER72
06-04-2012, 11:44 AM
you sound butt-hurt, literally. Were you by any chance an alter boy?

No..Not even a catholic. I appreciate your attempts at humor, but you crossed the line this time.
With your attitudes towards the Catholic church, it seems more likely that you have some anger issues toward the priests or father figures.
Were you abused and sodomized by your old man?

Vaark
06-04-2012, 11:48 AM
No..Not even a catholic. I appreciate your attempts at humor, but you crossed the line this time.
With your attitudes towards the Catholic church, it seems more likely that you have some anger issues toward the priests or father figures.
Were you abused and sodomized by your old man?

No and no... but on the other hand, my father married my mom, he wasn't her "client" .

tylerdolphin
06-04-2012, 11:53 AM
Calm down guys.

LANGER72
06-04-2012, 02:42 PM
Calm down guys.

:brewskis:

phins_4_ever
06-04-2012, 10:01 PM
The switch is not broken...your sense of decency is.
It is portrayed as some type of sick glory hole with Jesus Christ offering himself to 2 small children. It is highly objectionable.
You should have used the aardvark instead of Christ..it would be equally sick and perverted but it would make perfect sense to me.

Ohhhhhh. That's what that means. Thanks for explaining in detail. :lol:

---------- Post added at 10:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 PM ----------


Calm down guys.

If we calm down will that fix the broken switch? :brewskis:

phins_4_ever
06-04-2012, 10:04 PM
Calm down guys.

If we calm down will that fix the broken switch? :) :brewskis:

jguig
06-12-2012, 09:45 PM
To defame that which other people hold sacred is not humorous. I see though that you are super funny and courageous. Why don't you do make fun of Mohammad. Why don't you do that in Saudi Arabia or Yemen. Otherwise you are just a punk and not as courageous as you think you are.

Locke
06-13-2012, 01:13 AM
To defame that which other people hold sacred is not humorous. I see though that you are super funny and courageous. Why don't you do make fun of Mohammad. Why don't you do that in Saudi Arabia or Yemen. Otherwise you are just a punk and not as courageous as you think you are.

:sidelol:

LANGER72
06-13-2012, 10:22 AM
Ohhhhhh. That's what that means. Thanks for explaining in detail. :lol:

---------- Post added at 10:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 PM ----------



If we calm down will that fix the broken switch? :brewskis:


You can't fix stupid.

He should have replaced JC with Obama. Let's see how funny that looks....

Vaark
06-13-2012, 11:29 AM
You can't fix stupid.

He should have replaced JC with Obama. Let's see how funny that looks....

Ordinarily I'd take offense at that aspersion - if I hadn't considered the source and concluded that being called "stupid" by some "folks" is just about as disingenuous as being labeled "dysfunctional" by Lindsay Lohan.

LANGER72
06-13-2012, 11:44 AM
I was talking about your "switch" and not you personally. Using JC was a bad idea to a lot of "folks". I like a lot of your attempts at comedy, you are very talented...it definitely adds a lot to the forum. In this case, it was offensive to me. You deliberately created that to throw gas on the fire. Well played.

I am still waiting for the Obama version..that would be funny.

Vaark
06-13-2012, 11:54 AM
I was talking about your "switch" and not you personally. Using JC was a bad idea to a lot of "folks". I like a lot of your attempts at comedy, you are very talented...it definitely adds a lot to the forum. In this case, it was offensive to me. You deliberately created that to throw gas on the fire. Well played.

Okay, sorry, I stand corrected.. I'll be honest, I've always liked you in the main forum and find that there's more than a little overlap between our opinions; however I dislike sharp edged politics on both sides, although admittedly, maybe it's my perception only, but the extreme rightwing seems more mean-spirited and racist. So I do try to get a rise sometimes in measured proportion to what precipitated it. I interpreted yours as a not-too-veiled end-around reflection on me personally. You've obviously seen I don't mince words and have no problem mucking in the mud when challenged or insulted in the main forum, so I did see red, especially after trying to honor Tyler's request. :up:

LANGER72
06-13-2012, 12:58 PM
Okay, sorry, I stand corrected.. I'll be honest, I've always liked you in the main forum and find that there's more than a little overlap between our opinions; however I dislike sharp edged politics on both sides, although admittedly, maybe it's my perception only, but the extreme rightwing seems more mean-spirited and racist. So I do try to get a rise sometimes in measured proportion to what precipitated it. I interpreted yours as a not-too-veiled end-around reflection on me personally. You've obviously seen I don't mince words and have no problem mucking in the mud when challenged or insulted in the main forum, so I did see red, especially after trying to honor Tyler's request. :up:



The perception of me as a right winger is off base. There are plenty of my posts that show moderation(right of center..lol). I prefer the republican party at this point in history although the independents make more sense. I have voted democrat almost as many times as I have voted republican since 1980! There are a few here that try to paint me right wing in attempts to marginalize me. It seems to be working. Whatever makes them happy.
I can make end a rounds, and try to insult those without doing it directly....it can be quite fun. And I don't walk away from a fight either.
I think I will stay out of religious attack discussion and look the other way...lol