PDA

View Full Version : Obama again bombs mourners.



Dolphins9954
06-05-2012, 09:43 PM
The Obama policy of attacking rescuers and grieving rituals continues this weekend in Pakistan.
In February, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism documented (http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/02/04/obama-terror-drones-cia-tactics-in-pakistan-include-targeting-rescuers-and-funerals/) that after the U.S. kills people with drones in Pakistan, it then targets for death those who show up at the scene to rescue the survivors and retrieve the bodies, as well as those who gather to mourn the dead at funerals: “the CIA’s drone campaign in Pakistan has killed dozens of civilians who had gone to help rescue victims or were attending funerals.” As The New York Times summarized (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/world/asia/us-drone-strikes-are-said-to-target-rescuers.html) those findings: “at least 50 civilians had been killed in follow-up strikes after they rushed to help those hit by a drone-fired missile” while “the bureau counted more than 20 other civilians killed in strikes on funerals.”

This repellent practice continues. Over the last three days, the U.S. has launched three separate drone strikes in Pakistan: one on each day. As The Guardian reports (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/04/15-dead-drone-pakistan), the U.S. has killed between 20 and 30 people in these strikes, the last of which, early this morning, killed between 8 and 15. It was the second strike, on Sunday, that targeted mourners (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/03/american-drones-kill-12-pakistan) gathered to grieve those killed in the first strike:

At the time of the attack, suspected militants had gathered to offer condolences to the brother of a militant commander killed during another US unmanned drone attack on Saturday. The brother was one of those who died in the Sunday morning attack. The Pakistani officials said two of the dead were foreigners and the rest were Pakistani.

Note that there is no suggestion, even from the “officials” on which these media reports (as usual) rely, that the dead man was a Terrorist or even a “militant.” He was simply receiving condolences for his dead brother. But pursuant to the standards embraced (http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/militants_media_propaganda/singleton/) by President Obama, the brother — without knowing anything about him — is inherently deemed a “combatant” and therefore a legitimate target for death solely by virtue of being a “military-age male in a strike zone.” Of course, killing family members of bombing targets is nothing new for this President: let’s recall the still-unresolved question (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/anwar-al-awlakis-family-speaks-out-against-his-sons-deaths/2011/10/17/gIQA8kFssL_story.html) of why Anwar Awlaki’s 16-year-old American son, Abdulrahman, was killed by a U.S. drone attack in Yemen two weeks after his father was killed.

I ask this sincerely: what kind of country targets rescuers, funeral attendees, and people gathered to mourn? If a Hollywood film featured a villainous King ordering lethal attacks on rescuers, funerals and mourners — those medically attending to or grieving his initial victims — any decent audience member would, by design, seethe with contempt for such an inhumane tyrant. But this is the standard policy and practice under President Obama and it continues through today. Recall the outrage that was sparked when WikiLeaks released its Collateral Murder video showing (http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/04/05/well-its-their-fault-for-bringing-their-kids-into-a-battle/) a U.S. Apache helicopter during the Bush era firing on unarmed rescuers, who had arrived to retrieve the initial victims who had been shot and were laying wounded on the ground. That tactic continues under President Obama, although it is now expanded to include the targeting of grieving rituals.


http://www.salon.com/2012/06/04/obama_again_bombs_mourners/singleton/


But he supports gay marriage so I'll look past his war crimes.

Valandui
06-07-2012, 12:22 AM
I, for one, definitely feel safer because of this. Everyone knows that terrorists are the only ones who go to funerals.

Dolphins9954
06-07-2012, 08:21 AM
I, for one, definitely feel safer because of this. Everyone knows that terrorists are the only ones who go to funerals.

And here we are ready to go to war in Syria because Assad kills civilians. Meanwhile in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen.

LANGER72
06-07-2012, 12:45 PM
If he gets reelected, we can expect the same thing here..

LANGER72
06-07-2012, 12:58 PM
x

Locke
06-07-2012, 08:36 PM
If he gets reelected, we can expect the same thing here..

Are you implying Romney would be different? Seriously...?

Perfect23
06-14-2012, 03:17 PM
Everybody had this notion that Obama was anti-war.

CedarPhin
06-14-2012, 03:21 PM
I guess the lesson here is: Don't go to Afghani weddings/large social gatherings.