PDA

View Full Version : The Religion of Atheism



Alter2Ego
08-08-2012, 10:35 PM
ALTER2EGO -to- EVERYONE:

Atheists consistently attempt to take the higher ground by pointing fingers of accusation at theists and accusing theists of committing all sorts of human rights violations in the name of "cultish religions," as they are fond of putting it. According to atheists, it is the belief in God that has caused people to commit the various atrocities common to mankind. Remove religion, belief in God, and belief in the Bible--the atheists argue--and the world will be a better place. This latter conclusion is mortally flawed for the following reasons:

1. Atheists have committed human rights violations en masse throughout history. For instance, Joseph Stalin--the atheist--ordered the deaths of between 40 million to 62 million people (20 million of which were everyday Soviet civilians), compared to the 6 million killed by Adolph Hitler the Roman Catholic "Christian."

In other words, the problem is not the Bible or God. The problem is people, including those in false religions which have failed to teach the masses Biblical truths. An appreciation for Biblical truths and Jehovah's righteous standards of what's right and what's wrong is the only detriment against people committing human rights violations. Blaming God for the crimes of false Christians is an attempt at passing the buck.

"See! This only I have found, that the true God made mankind upright, but they themselves have sought out many plans." (Ecclesiastes 7:29)


2. Atheism is itself a religion. While atheist will argue that they don't believe in any god, the issue is not merely non-belief in God or gods but in having ANY sort of belief system. The belief system of atheism is centered around the philosophy of "secular-humanism."


3. Atheism is a religion according to a 2005 Wisconsin federal court ruling as well as the U.S. Supreme Court—the highest court in the land.

rob19
08-08-2012, 11:16 PM
puhhhhleeeaaassseeee give me your thoughts on these


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra0mj3A67OU&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_HTJiPni1c&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--5ob8UIgNc&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJMI_4_2UZ0&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LntLIFb8qw&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkCS9ePWuLU&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrB6z4iy1rg&feature=player_embedded

http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/08/Untitled3-1.jpg
http://www.finheaven.com/images/imported/2012/08/400_F_26154497_3NihXaOK0h9MCz4YuuLgtTHnY-1.jpg

rob19
08-08-2012, 11:22 PM
Exodus 16:14

And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground.

JCane
08-08-2012, 11:23 PM
Biblical truths

You lost me right around here somewhere.

:idk:

Then you mentioned something about Wisconsin.

Wisconsin is only relevant in Big 10 football.

Federal court rulings on what is and what isn't a Religion is out of their realm of expertise.

Alter2Ego
08-08-2012, 11:39 PM
You lost me right around here somewhere.

:idk:

Then you mentioned something about Wisconsin.

Wisconsin is only relevant in Big 10 football.

Federal court rulings on what is and what isn't a Religion is out of their realm of expertise.
ALTER2EGO -to- JCANE:

Is that so. I'm sure the atheist who filed the lawsuit in Wisconsin, demanding his "religious rights," didn't share your sentiment. In fact, below is evidence that exposes atheists as hypocrites for insisting they are not religious. This evidence involves the 2005 Wisconsin Federal Court ruling in the case of Kaufman v. McCaughtry, in which a judge recognized Atheism as a religion. Keep your eyes on the words in red within the quotation.


EVIDENCE FOR THE HYPOCRISY OF ATHEISTS:

"Court Rules Atheism A Religion
Decides 1st Amendment protects prison inmate's right to start study group

Published: 08/20/2005 at 1:00 AM

A federal court of appeals ruled yesterday Wisconsin prison officials violated an inmate’s rights because they did not treat atheism as a religion.

"Atheism is [the inmate's] religion, and the group that he wanted to start was religious in nature even though it expressly rejects a belief in a supreme being," the 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals said."

The court decided the inmate’s First Amendment rights were violated because the prison refused to allow him to create a study group for atheists.

Brian Fahling, senior trial attorney for the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy, called the court’s ruling "a sort of Alice in Wonderland jurisprudence."

"Up is down, and atheism, the antithesis of religion, is religion," said Fahling.

The Supreme Court has said a religion need not be based on a belief in the existence of a supreme being. In the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins, the court described "secular humanism" as a religion."
http://www.wnd.com/2005/08/31895/

JCane
08-08-2012, 11:44 PM
JCANE -to- ALTER2EGO

Keep your eyes on the words in red:

**** that judge's ruling.

Atheism isn't a Religion.

Also, I assume that you believe that the courts have ALWAYS gotten it 110% right with their rulings. They've NEVER been wrong. Or are they wrong when it directly benefits your argument?

rob19
08-08-2012, 11:45 PM
ALTER2EGO -to- JCANE:

Is that so. I'm sure the atheist who filed the lawsuit in Wisconsin, demanding his "religious rights," didn't share your sentiment. In fact, below is evidence that exposes atheists as hypocrites for insisting they are not religious. This evidence involves the 2005 Wisconsin Federal Court ruling in the case of of Kaufman v. McCaughtry, in which a judge recognized Atheism as a religion. Keep your eyes on the words in red within the quotation.


EVIDENCE FOR THE HYPOCRISY OF ATHEISTS:

http://www.wnd.com/2005/08/31895/


stop dodging me!

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 12:09 AM
stop dodging me!
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:

Dodging you! Don't be dramatic. I will respond to your posts when you present your own expressions--as opposed to loading up your posts with videos of what other people are saying. Somehow you seem to think that because someone said something on a videotape, it's supposed to give their personal opinions more relevance than when it is not videotaped. I will not spend the time watching somebody who isn't even on this forum rattling off his or her personal opinions on video.

You will notice that I always state my position in my own words, after which I partially quote a source when I have one. In addition, I highlight portions of the source's statements in bold or in red if I want to bring something to the attention of others. Last but not least, I provide the weblink or identify the source by name or by publication. I don't just post a weblink or a videotape. Of course since that's your preference, go for it.

rob19
08-09-2012, 12:25 AM
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:

Dodging you! Don't be dramatic. I will respond to your posts when you present your own expressions--as opposed to loading up your posts with videos of what other people are saying. Somehow you seem to think that because someone said something on a videotape, it's supposed to give their personal opinions more relevance that when it is not videotaped. I will not spend the time watching somebody who isn't even on this forum rattling off his or her personal opinions on video.

You will notice that I always state my position in my own words, after which I partially quote a source when I have one. In addition, I highlight portions of the source's statements in bold or in red if I want to bring something to the attention of others. Last but not least, I provide the weblink or identify the source by name or by publication. I don't just post a weblink or a videotape. Of course since that's your preference, go for it.


Relax I'm being jocular. If you don't want to watch all of them then do me the favor of watching the first two.

I don't know what significance the medium of the idea is, but if you prefer I transcribe it then whatever floats your boat. Basically, John Marco Allegro, a Dead Sea Scrolls scholar of world renown, argues that Jesus Christ was in fact a hallucinogenic mushroom rather than a real person. If you aren't familiar with The Dead Sea Scrolls, it's the earliest writings of the bible.


As a philologist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philologist), Allegro analysed the derivations of language. He traced biblical words and phrases back to their roots in Sumerian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumerian_language), and showed how Sumerian phonemes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonemes) recur in varying but related contexts in many Semitic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic), classical and other Indo-European languages (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages). Although meanings changed to some extent, Allegro found some basic religious ideas passing on through the genealogy of words. His book The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross relates the development of language in Eurasia to the development of myths, religions and cultic practices in many cultures. Allegro believed he could prove through etymology that the roots of Christianity, as of many other religions, lay in fertility cults (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_cults); and that cultic practices, such as ingesting hallucinogenic drugs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucinogenic_drugs) to perceive the Mind of God, persisted into Christian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian) times.Here, these are the two. Watch these and give me your thoughts on them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra0mj3A67OU&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_HTJiPni1c&feature=player_embedded#!



--
Dead Sea Scrolls

The texts are of great historical and religious significance and include the earliest known surviving copies of biblical and extra-biblical documents as well as preserve evidence of great diversity in lateSecond Temple Judaism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Temple_Judaism). They are written in Hebrew (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_language), Aramaic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramaic_language), Greek (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_language), and Nabataean (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabataean_language), mostly onparchment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchment), but with some written on papyrus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papyrus) and bronze (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze).

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 12:25 AM
JCANE -to- ALTER2EGO

Keep your eyes on the words in red:

**** that judge's ruling.

Atheism isn't a Religion.

Also, I assume that you believe that the courts have ALWAYS gotten it 110% right with their rulings. They've NEVER been wrong. Or are they wrong when it directly benefits your argument?
ALTER2EGO -to- J CANE:
The issue is not whether or not I assume court rulings are always right but that the atheists themselves argued they were in a religion when they filed their lawsuits.

For instance, if you notice in the 2005 Wisconsin Federal Court case, that was an Appeals Court decision. In other words, the atheist lost the first round in superior court and took it to the appeals court where he won. Additionally, as far back as 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that atheism is a religion--after another atheist filed a lawsuit. In the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins, the atheist lost at both the superior court level and the appeals court level. So he took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court--the highest court in the land where court decisions affect the entire USA. In the Supreme Court, he won.

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 12:40 AM
Relax I'm being jocular. If you don't want to watch all of them then do me the favor of watching the first two.

I don't know what significance the medium of the idea is, but if you prefer I transcribe it then whatever floats your boat. Basically, John Marco Allegro, a Dead Sea Scrolls scholar of world renown, argues that Jesus Christ was in fact a hallucinogenic mushroom rather than a real person.
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
Someone makes a statement like that and you expect me to take him seriously? Get real. I'm more likely to believe he himself was smoking the hallucinogenic mushrooms. He sounds like a nutcase.


If you aren't familiar with The Dead Sea Scrolls, it's the earliest writings of the bible.
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
I am very much familiar with the Dead Sea Scrolls, and I know they are the oldest surviving copies of the Hebrew/Old Testament portion of God's inspired Word. What point are you trying to make regarding those?


Here, these are the two. Watch these and give me your thoughts on them.
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
Sorry, but I'm really not interested in hearing the personal opinions/speculations of any of these individuals. I believe I told you this before.

JCane
08-09-2012, 12:45 AM
ALTER2EGO -to- J CANE:
The issue is not whether or not I assume court rulings are always right but that the atheists themselves argued they were in a religion when they filed their lawsuits.

For instance, if you notice in the 2005 Wisconsin Federal Court case, that was an Appeals Court decision. In other words, the atheist lost the first round in superior court and took it to the appeals court where he won. Additionally, as far back as 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that atheism is a religion--after another atheist filed a lawsuit. In the 1961 case of Torcaso v. Watkins, the atheist lost at both the superior court level and the appeals court level. So he took it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court--the highest court in the land where court decisions affect the entire USA. In the Supreme Court, he won.

Those are misinformed Atheists. You have booger-eaters in every group Religious and non. This guy who argued that Atheism was Religion did so probably for personal benefit and gain and no other reason.

Atheism is not a Religion nor is Agnosticism.

rob19
08-09-2012, 12:54 AM
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
Someone makes a statement like that and you expect me to take him seriously? Get real. I'm more likely to believe he himself was smoking the hallucinogenic mushrooms. He sounds like a nutcase.


ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
I am very much familiar with the Dead Sea Scrolls, and I know they are the oldest surviving copies of the Hebrew/Old Testament portion of God's inspired Word. What point are you trying to make regarding those?


ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
Sorry, but I'm really not interested in hearing the personal opinions/speculations of any of these individuals. I believe I told you this before.

You don't smoke mushrooms. Besides, I don't know what harm would arise from it. I understand it sounds radical but it's actually a very credible source. At the very least shouldn't you be able to hear the information and then make an informed opinion about it? I think that's a better route than ignorantly dismissing the matter entirely.

Exodus 16:14

And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground.

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 01:02 AM
Those are misinformed Atheists. You have booger-eaters in every group Religious and non. This guy who argued that Atheism was Religion did so probably for personal benefit and gain and no other reason.

Atheism is not a Religion nor is Agnosticism.
ALTER2EGO -to- J CANE:
You can remain in denial if that makes you happy. It's not going to change the court rulings. Furthermore, what makes you think these are the only two atheist cases that made it through the court system? There are others I could cite. In fact, I will do so at a later time.

JCane
08-09-2012, 01:11 AM
ALTER2EGO -to- J CANE:
You can remain in denial if that makes you happy. It's not going to change the court rulings. Furthermore, what makes you think these are the only two atheist cases that made it through the court system? There are others I could cite. In fact, I will do so at a later time.

I'm sure there are others that you could cite.

Doesn't change anything.

If I go outside and insist that the sky is green, what color is the sky?

It's blue.

Just because a few non-informed Atheists claim that Atheism is a Religion, it doesn't make it an actual Religion.

tylerdolphin
08-09-2012, 01:14 AM
LOL @ people actually claiming that the belief in nothing in particular is a religion. I mean, seriously, how delusional do you have to be...

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 01:15 AM
You don't smoke mushrooms. Besides, I don't know what harm would arise from it. I understand it sounds radical but it's actually a very credible source. At the very least shouldn't you be able to hear the information and then make an informed opinion about it? I think that's a better route than ignorantly dismissing the matter entirely.

Exodus 16:14

And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground.
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:

Of course YOU don't see any harm in me wasting my time watching atheists spout their personal philosophy aka opinions on video. Why doesn't that surprise me?

I can make much better use of my time than to waste it listening to people spouting nonsense on video. Nonsense for which they can't present a shred of evidence. I happen to know that the statement about Jesus never having existed is false. And I haven't even touched the idiotic statement about hallucinogenic mushrooms.

At another time, I will start a thread in which I will present documentary evidence for the historicity of the Jesus Christ of the Bible.

JCane
08-09-2012, 01:20 AM
LOL @ people actually claiming that the belief in nothing in particular is a religion. I mean, seriously, how delusional do you have to be...

You'd have to eat a lot of boogers in your wasted time on science's Earth.

rob19
08-09-2012, 01:31 AM
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:

Of course YOU don't see any harm in me wasting my time watching atheists spout their personal philosophy aka opinions on video. Why doesn't that surprise me?

I can make much better use of my time than to waste it listening to people spouting nonsense on video. Nonsense for which they can't present a shred of evidence. I happen to know that the statement about Jesus never having existed is false. And I haven't even touched the idiotic statement about hallucinogenic mushrooms.

At another time, I will start a thread in which I will present documentary evidence for the historicity of the Jesus Christ of the Bible.


Well all you've done so far is output information and refused to take any back yourself. If you aren't here to exchange ideas, then is it safe to assume you're just here to preach?

You're right though, I suppose a better use of your time would be to continue mass enrolling on message boards for the sole purpose of proselytizing. Must be fulfilling.

JCane
08-09-2012, 01:35 AM
JCANE -to- ALTER2EGO:

This is the Internet, not a CB radio. Using the quote function will suffice...

OVER

tylerdolphin
08-09-2012, 01:39 AM
tylerdolphin -to- Alter2Ego:


Why wont God heal amputees or other maladies medical science hasnt figured out yet?

JCane
08-09-2012, 01:45 AM
tylerdolphin -to- Alter2Ego:


Why wont God heal amputees or other maladies medical science hasnt figured out yet?

Jesus did heal a man with leprosy.

For free.

****ing Socialist.

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 02:00 AM
Well all you've done so far is output information and refused to take any back yourself. If you aren't here to exchange ideas, then is it safe to assume you're just here to preach?
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
I responded to what other people posted by reading what they personally expressed. Your routine is to present nothing but videos of other people spouting their personal philosophy. Now you are taking offense because I refuse to view the videos.

I don't have a problem with people making their own original statements, after which they back it up with weblinks from their sources. You do nothing of the sort. You simply post a video without telling anybody what you personally feel. Your entire argument is based upon what somebody else opines in their video.



You're right though, I suppose a better use of your time would be to continue mass enrolling on message boards for the sole purpose of proselytizing. Must be fulfilling.
ALTER2EGO -to- ROB19:
I don't mass enroll on message boards. I join a couple at a time. When I decide the community is not for me, I ask the moderators to cancel my account. If they refuse, I simply abandon the account. Many of those websites you see me registered at are abandoned accounts that I haven't been on for months.

While we're on the topic of proselytizing, what do you suppose atheists do on these forums--besides trying to force atheist philosophy down the throats of theists? At just about every single website I've ever been on, the atheists overrun the Religion forums and out-number believers. They start up thread after thread attacking God, Christianity, and the Bible. If that's not proselytizing, then I don't know what is.

JCane
08-09-2012, 02:02 AM
So you're not a Dolphin fan but rather some mass Religious troll?

As a Moderator myself, you may not have to ask us to deactivate your account.

michaelscott
08-09-2012, 02:09 AM
The story of Job disproves the existence of "god" in a biblical sense.


Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

rob19
08-09-2012, 02:15 AM
I prefer to hear than to read. It's not original because it's not MY idea, it's John Marco Allegro's idea, one of the few people on the planet qualified to interpret The Dead Sea Scrolls, he uses biblical verses in support of his ideas, of course you wouldn't know that though as you refuse to watch anything I post.

WVDolphan
08-09-2012, 02:17 AM
JCANE -to- ALTER2EGO:

This is the Internet, not a CB radio. Using the quote function will suffice...

OVER

:lol: This guy signed up just to troll the **** out of you guys. :lol:

Alter2Ego
08-09-2012, 03:01 AM
So you're not a Dolphin fan but rather some mass Religious troll?

As a Moderator myself, you may not have to ask us to deactivate your account.
ALTER2EGO -to- J CANE:
All of a sudden it is a requirement that all those who join this website should be Dolphin fans. I read the Rules carefully before joining and did not see any mention of that requirement.

Your above statement in red is the exact reason why I don't engage moderators on religion forums. It is also the reason why I don't stay very long at most forums. The minute a moderator starts pushing his/her weight around, trying to act cute, I leave. I neglected to elaborate in my message to ROB19 the reason why I've abandoned all those accounts where you see me registered. It's because of arrogant moderators like you who feel it's your privilege to insult regular members and then threaten them with banning.

So now I'm a "mass Religious troll." And as a moderator, according to you, I may not have to ask people in your position to deactivate my account. If that's not a threat and a warning that I must now walk on egg shells, I don't know what is.

I can see now why there aren't too many theists on this forum. They are concerned their account will be banned if they express themselves by opposing atheists at a forum that is moderated by atheists. That's pretty sad.

If you think being a moderator on a website gives you power over the lives of others, you need a reality check. You need to get a life.



You threatened me with banning in your message above, although I've broken no forum rules. It seems this thread about atheism being a religion is burning you up. A loser like you is in no position to intimidate me with threats about banning. You are petty. I want no further contact with you.


I'm out of here.


You may cancel this account at your pleasure as I will not be returning.

JCane
08-09-2012, 03:05 AM
Yeap, definitely a troll job.

Next.

overworkedirish
08-09-2012, 04:23 AM
The problem is people
This is the only part of the OP that I agree with.

NY8123
08-09-2012, 09:28 AM
NY8123 -to- Alter2Ego:

If you decide to return to our lovely community I wish to welcome you and your thread to the depths of the sea, a place where you may profess your love and admiration of your fellow (Wo)Man. A place where all are welcome and all opinions are valid regardless of how ****ed up or self deluded.

Since you never took the time to try and understand where our fellow board members come from or what faith they are inclined to follow and only decided to express your interpretations of Bible, I would like to be the first to say, thank you for setting the law of averages right and proving to me that anything in excess is bad. While your views are not overly excessive for an extremist, they are completely based on faith (I cannot blame you for that and a small part of me admires that in you). I would like to see you in the future come back to the board and finish the debate you left off in the religious forum, a debate you did not really debate anything I guess, it was more of a self proclaimed pulpit season. I look forward to your return and maybe I will just move on with you to the next board, I would like to suggest a wonderful site: GangGreen.com. I think you will find it rather stimulating and enlightening.

So in closing from this Catholic to a fellow Christian I would also like to be the first to give you a whole hearted "go **** yourself with a whiffle ball bat you nacey ass piece of ****". Have a good day and may you repeatably be blessed with a scratchy yeast infection that drips for weeks. May good tidings of "a slice of shut the **** up" be sent upon you and let it henceforth be known that we here on the forum wish you the best in your endeavors as a self proclaimed dip **** who is blinded by the notion of a "holier than thou" attitude which will hopefully lead to a broken nose.

Well I'm off to say my four Hail Marrys and one Our Father to absolve me of my sin of slandering my fellow Christan (which isn't really a sin but hey better to be safe than sorry after all the bible says love your fellow man).

Sincerely,

- **** Off.

SkapePhin
08-09-2012, 11:28 AM
alter2ego = expert troll.

DisturbedShifty
08-09-2012, 11:57 AM
alter2ego = expert troll.

I think I would go as far as saying supreme kingly god of trolls. I mean that guy joined this month and all his posts were in the religion forum. I wonder if he is part of the Westboro Baptist Church?

Forgive my spelling. This was sent from my phone.

NY8123
08-09-2012, 01:15 PM
alter2ego = expert troll.

There is no expert involved it is just a self indulging penis-hole.

COphinphan89
08-09-2012, 09:19 PM
Sometimes I wonder if having a job is worth missing these epic threads.

NY8123
10-22-2012, 01:40 PM
No sign of this Jehovah for months now but I did find the next board lol:

Alter2Ego
Senior Member
Last Activity: 17th October 2012 09:59 PM
User Lists

About Me
About Alter2Ego
Location
Los Angeles, CA

Signature
"That people may know that you, whose name is Jehovah, you alone are the Most High over all the earth." (Psalms 83:18)

http://www.mashada.com/forums/members/alter2ego.html

The Stache99
10-22-2012, 09:39 PM
How do I miss epic threads like this until its too late??????

NY8123
10-23-2012, 09:22 AM
How do I miss epic threads like this until its too late??????

Let me give you a synopsis:

Alter2Ego registers as an active user here on finheaven
Alter2Ego then proceeds to initiate debate with any and all persons who will take the bait
Alter2Ego then proceeds to belittle every single faith except that expressed by them
We move Alter2Ego to the depths
Alter2Ego then gets the attention of the sarcastic collective body and after a barrage of insults retreats to the next board as is their MO.

[S][T][O][R][M]
10-30-2012, 08:14 PM
You forgot the 3 biggest atheists to date - Hitler, Stalin and Pol-Pot

And yes, their record speaks big time.

They believe in total gun control. NO human rights, And were the most viscous killers of their time.

And according to the Book of Revelation, all atheists are in for a vey, very rude awakening.

irish fin fan
11-07-2012, 10:32 PM
NY8123 -to- Alter2Ego:

If you decide to return to our lovely community I wish to welcome you and your thread to the depths of the sea, a place where you may profess your love and admiration of your fellow (Wo)Man. A place where all are welcome and all opinions are valid regardless of how ****ed up or self deluded.

Since you never took the time to try and understand where our fellow board members come from or what faith they are inclined to follow and only decided to express your interpretations of Bible, I would like to be the first to say, thank you for setting the law of averages right and proving to me that anything in excess is bad. While your views are not overly excessive for an extremist, they are completely based on faith (I cannot blame you for that and a small part of me admires that in you). I would like to see you in the future come back to the board and finish the debate you left off in the religious forum, a debate you did not really debate anything I guess, it was more of a self proclaimed pulpit season. I look forward to your return and maybe I will just move on with you to the next board, I would like to suggest a wonderful site: GangGreen.com. I think you will find it rather stimulating and enlightening.

So in closing from this Catholic to a fellow Christian I would also like to be the first to give you a whole hearted "go **** yourself with a whiffle ball bat you nacey ass piece of ****". Have a good day and may you repeatably be blessed with a scratchy yeast infection that drips for weeks. May good tidings of "a slice of shut the **** up" be sent upon you and let it henceforth be known that we here on the forum wish you the best in your endeavors as a self proclaimed dip **** who is blinded by the notion of a "holier than thou" attitude which will hopefully lead to a broken nose.

Well I'm off to say my four Hail Marrys and one Our Father to absolve me of my sin of slandering my fellow Christan (which isn't really a sin but hey better to be safe than sorry after all the bible says love your fellow man).

Sincerely,

- **** Off.

Now that's a nice send off to our Christian friends. Lol

NY8123
11-08-2012, 02:26 PM
Now that's a nice send off to our Christian friends. Lol

LOL there is a difference between engaging in a religious debate with a logical person and a person being bat **** crazy lol.