PDA

View Full Version : Feeley and the Phins in Madden 2004!



SkapePhin
02-22-2004, 04:12 PM
About a month ago, before anyone thought we would pick up Feeley, I took Feeley in FA during my 2004 offseason.. He was supposed to be my stop gap and I draft another WR to go with chambers and the Phin ended up going to the Superbowl.. but lost to the Packers..

I just thought it was interesing.

Prime
02-22-2004, 04:16 PM
lets just hope that, that was the future..accept we win the superbowl :)

RUDEbyallMEANS
02-22-2004, 05:16 PM
Hell, in MAdden 2004 I got Fiedler to take Miami to the Superbowl throwing for 400 yards in the season..

Means nothing

SkapePhin
02-22-2004, 05:32 PM
I simulated the season.. I know it means nothing... but still interesting.

Lukin
02-22-2004, 06:33 PM
you guys ever played ESPN Football, i think it's called. It's taking the place of Sega's 2K3 series. Anyway... It's better than Madden. And I've been a madden addict for 8 years. Everything about it is better, graphics, gameplay, offseason, and most of all you don't get the feeling the CPU is cheating it's @ss off when you're winning the game late in the 4th quarter.

TerryTate
02-22-2004, 06:59 PM
ESPN MAdden football = unrealistic hits, animation is crap....

Ive said it a million times....

theres areason madden ownz :lol:

Lukin
02-23-2004, 10:16 AM
I disagree. ESPN is at least Just as Good, if not better. Madden does gay stuff like make Receivers w/ 99 catch and 99 impact drop crutial 3rd down passes. It pisses me off.

Chambers34Phins
02-23-2004, 11:13 AM
All it has is graphics, the game play is HORRIBLE, the interface is HORRIBLE. The game is far to easy, it gives me zero challenge. Madden has realistic hits, a better interface, and just more belivable game play. I have liked other espn games, but espn football sucks.

It doesn't do tha to me lukin, what you playing on rookie?

Predaphin
02-24-2004, 05:18 PM
can you guys imagine what our QB rating will be in Madden 05??? I was surprised they had J.Fiedler that high (81-82)....Feeley shoudl be a ....what?....(72-73) :(

Chambers34Phins
02-25-2004, 09:07 AM
fiedler was a 95 when i was done with him. But then I drafted a rookie and traded fiedler away.

Lukin
02-25-2004, 09:22 AM
Originally posted by Williams34Phins
All it has is graphics, the game play is HORRIBLE, the interface is HORRIBLE. The game is far to easy, it gives me zero challenge. Madden has realistic hits, a better interface, and just more belivable game play. I have liked other espn games, but espn football sucks.

It doesn't do tha to me lukin, what you playing on rookie?

Obviously you guys haven't played Madden near as much as I have, so you haven't got tired of all it's flaws.

And I play on all Madden. Every thing below that isn't challenging anymore.:sleep:

Baz
02-25-2004, 07:59 PM
Lukin is right. The damn game makes you drop too many passes. Chambers wide open on a slant? He is gonna catch it 90% of the time. However, on the game, I'm looking at around a 60% completion rate on that same wide open slant......

Chambers34Phins
02-25-2004, 10:33 PM
Originally posted by Lukin


Obviously you guys haven't played Madden near as much as I have, so you haven't got tired of all it's flaws.

And I play on all Madden. Every thing below that isn't challenging anymore.:sleep:

I play every day......