View Full Version : 2nd in INTs in 1972
06-02-2002, 11:54 AM
Who was the 2nd on the team in INTs in 1972 with 4 behind Jake Scott's five ?
06-02-2002, 01:23 PM
didn't have to look that one up, i have that page memorized. i guess its safe to use the initials, i'll bet nobody knows the name, LM!
06-02-2002, 01:54 PM
the first question here will be "he was a dolphin"!!!!!!
06-02-2002, 04:58 PM
I know the answer, so I will let someone else have a chance.
I would like to add a clue if allowed. He later went on to play for another AFC East team. He probably had a better career with that other team, than with the fins. At least he was better known IMO.
06-02-2002, 07:28 PM
thats exactly what i said, he was not known on the fins, but elsewhere he was a starter!
06-02-2002, 10:29 PM
Was it Dick Anderson?
06-02-2002, 10:42 PM
Originally posted by booyeah_
Was it Dick Anderson? you would think, but no - he only had 3.
06-03-2002, 08:59 AM
True old school fin fans would know it, but, most of today's younger generation would have no idea who this guy is.
06-03-2002, 09:10 AM
a hint - he was a 16th round pick from Texas Southern - OK doubt that will help, but he is not Scott or Anderson.
06-04-2002, 10:42 AM
does everybody, but 06, give up ?
06-04-2002, 10:50 AM
seems that way!
06-04-2002, 10:57 AM
#26 Lloyd Mumphord
06-04-2002, 02:59 PM
i ran acroos a couple of names that just absolutely slipped my mind. charlie babb and mike kolen. they each had one. and i can't believe anderson was third with 3!
06-04-2002, 03:04 PM
Originally posted by dolfan06
i ran acroos a couple of names that just absolutely slipped my mind. charlie babb and mike kolen. they each had one. and i can't believe anderson was third with 3! if we have mumphord, curtis johnson and tim foley, which 2 started - do you remember ?
06-04-2002, 03:10 PM
Originally posted by dolphan39
if we have mumphord, curtis johnson and tim foley, which 2 started - do you remember ? tim foley at LCB and curtis johnson at RCB were the starters, yet mumphord had more INT's. only one more than foley, but it's still more.
06-04-2002, 03:52 PM
so who is better ?
Jake Scott, Dick Anderson, lloyd mumphord, curtis johnson and tim foley
Sam Madison, Pat Surtain, Terry Cousins, Brock Marion and Brian Walker
Sam Madison, Pat Surtain, Jamar Fletcher, Brock Marion and Arturo Freeman
06-04-2002, 04:11 PM
i'm gonna say the first group, mainly because they shut the offenses off cold. very seldom did foley or johnson get burned or drop the friggin ball after an INT. of course they didn't play as aggressive of a defense either!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.2 Copyright © 2014 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.