PDA

View Full Version : Price could be gone from ATL?



John Biello
06-07-2005, 02:40 AM
http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/NFL_SC-RUMOR

KPDolfan424
06-07-2005, 02:43 AM
Thats would be kinda nuts if that happend,but the rumor is always way off about alotta things,guess thats why its rumors

Slappy8800
06-07-2005, 02:45 AM
hes an underachiever....jenkins is a stud

SECfootball
06-07-2005, 02:52 AM
Don't they take a huge cap hit if he's cut?

Phinz1972
06-07-2005, 02:58 AM
hes an underachiever....jenkins is a stud


Price can be look uponed as an underachiever, but look at the facts:

1. when he was a good wr, he had Eric Moulds on the other side, so CBs were covering Moulds...in Alanta, he doesn't even have a half decent WR on the other side.

2. M.Vick wants to the run the ball 60% of the time, 35% of the time is Duckett and Dunn running the ball...5% throwing.

3. He has suffered a injury 2(or more) seasons ago and never really got back to form.

If he is truely let go, Miami will not pick him up because we have a decent group of WRs, but New England could be interested, as so the Jets could be.

byroan
06-07-2005, 03:04 AM
He's def. not a #1 receiver. He can do some damage as the #2 WR though.

akfinfan
06-07-2005, 03:04 AM
Price sucks. This is another wasted thread about suggesting we obtain crappy players.

Lazy1
06-07-2005, 03:16 AM
Price would be a sick weapon to have in a spread offence. I think 2 reasons why he wasnt productive in ATL is yes he isn't that great of a #1 WR and Michael Vick not gettin the ball downfield. If you watch ATL games you will always see wr's open downfield while mike vick is running around.

painnotpleasure
06-07-2005, 03:16 AM
I think his biggest problem is the offense that he is in there in Atlanta with Vick not being like a typical QB whatsoever... and the fact that he became the #1 WR there. He did great in Buffalo with Eric Moulds but that's when Bledsoe was looking good for them and he was the #2 WR where he excells at. If he got released (which would surprise me), there will definitely be a lot of teams going after him, he'd make a great #2 that's for sure. But by no means whatsoever do I think that we will be one of those teams.

PassRush
06-07-2005, 03:38 AM
Can he play safety?:roflmao:

painnotpleasure
06-07-2005, 03:47 AM
Can he play safety?:roflmao: :lol: Someone had to say it.

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 04:08 AM
hes an underachiever....jenkins is a stud
is this the same jenkins that was considered as big as disappointment last year as Reggie Williams?? :confused:

Smoke
06-07-2005, 04:18 AM
hes an underachiever....jenkins is a stud

7 rec 119 yards 0 td....Those are the numbers for the so called "stud".

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 04:44 AM
7 rec 119 yards 0 td....Those are the numbers for the so called "stud".
exactly... thanks for the stats to back up my arguement :up:

Slappy8800
06-07-2005, 04:51 AM
those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers

LtDan
06-07-2005, 04:51 AM
those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbersYes, very true

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 05:05 AM
those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers
yes... but they are disappointing for a first round pick.

...my point; however, is that they are not the numbers of a stud WR - Michael Clayton, Roy Williams and Larry Fitzgerald are studs.

LtDan
06-07-2005, 05:08 AM
yes... but they are disappointing for a first round pick.

...my point; however, is that they are not the numbers of a stud WR - Michael Clayton, Roy Williams and Larry Fitzgerald are studs.Jenkins will be a stud like that once he has a QB who can throw the ball

NOTE: And no, Vick can't throw accurately

Smoke
06-07-2005, 05:27 AM
those are called...rookie, #3 WR numbers

I don't know a lot about the guy, maybe he has potential. I'll I do know is he was the least productive out of the 7 wr's drafted in the first rd in 04'. Atlanta also used another 1st rd pick this year on Roddy White?? I'll i'm saying is that i'd expect more from a 1st rd pick.

Slappy8800
06-07-2005, 05:42 AM
what were fitzgerlad's #'s?....i didnt think they were THAT great..but I could be wrong

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 05:47 AM
58 recpts 780 yards 8 TDs

good rookie numbers... without a QB.

Smoke
06-07-2005, 05:50 AM
58 recpts 780 yards 8 TDs

good rookie numbers... without a QB.

He especially had a good game agaisnt us. Remember the td pass he caught in the last minute of the game? I think there was less than a minute and the score gave them a one point lead for the win.

Smoke
06-07-2005, 05:55 AM
Sorry to make you guys re live this, but here's the catch. I can't remember being more bitter after a game. Oh well, those days are gone.

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 06:03 AM
Sorry to make you guys re live this, but here's the catch. I can't remember being more bitter after a game. Oh well, those days are gone.

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif
ahh... reggie got owned.

Slappy8800
06-07-2005, 06:15 AM
decent Numbers....boldin was also gone for a good part of the year....

Smoke
06-07-2005, 06:17 AM
ahh... reggie got owned.

Yep. I sure hope he is more comfortable with the defense this year. He has some big payday's to live up to.

finsnchips
06-07-2005, 06:18 AM
Yep. I sure hope he is more comfortable with the defense this year. He has some big payday's to live up to.
yeah, I think Reggie's problem was that he played nickel last year and struggled in space... he is a starting CB and couldn't make the step down.

painnotpleasure
06-07-2005, 06:51 AM
Sorry to make you guys re live this, but here's the catch. I can't remember being more bitter after a game. Oh well, those days are gone.

http://www.finheaven.com/clear.gif :barf:

sn9ke.eyes
06-07-2005, 01:28 PM
Jenkins will be a stud like that once he has a QB who can throw the ball

NOTE: And no, Vick can't throw accurately

Good luck with all that. I don't see the Falcons cutting Vick anytime soon.

LightsOut
06-07-2005, 02:47 PM
price may have to retire due to an inoperable retinal condition.

Jaj
06-07-2005, 02:59 PM
We can't give another big name WR a slot spot.