Fitzy To Be An Eagle???

alen1 · 03-02-2008, 09:47 PM

A source tells the Trenton Times that the Eagles and Cardinals had talks about a trade that would send Larry Fitzgerald to Philadelphia.
The source called Arizona's asking price "absurd." The Eagles should consider courting D.J. Hackett. Having played for Mike Holmgren, he'd have a good grasp of the offense Andy Reid runs and could add size and downfield ability.

rotoworld.com

FINSFAN2781 · 03-03-2008, 10:08 AM

Of course the asking price would be absurd, Fitzgerald is one of the best receivers in the league. No one is going to get him for cheap.

TonySporanoTuna · 03-03-2008, 12:07 PM

How absurd? Two firsts absurd?

Vertical Limit · 03-03-2008, 12:30 PM

That's not absurd for arguably the best receiver in the NFL.^

alen1 · 03-03-2008, 12:36 PM

Best receiver? Whoa Vertical your pushing to the Limit.

Vertical Limit · 03-03-2008, 12:49 PM

Well, get him a consistent quarterback and the guy will produce crazy numbers. He's already had two seasons in which he has racked up about 1,400 yards.

He isn't Chris Chambers, Chambers is very inconsistent. People use the QB arguement with Chambers all the time, but hell, last year, the Cardinals juggled around Leinart and Warner, and Larry still produced. Then Leinart went down, then Warner with the elbow, and he still produced.

If he's not the best receiver in the league, then he's second to Moss. But he's amazing, no doubt.

alen1 · 03-03-2008, 01:05 PM

I think if you are going to consider anyone the best receiver in the league, it would have to be Torry Holt. Holt is the model of consistency but then again that is just my opinion.

03-03-2008, 10:08 AM	#2
FINSFAN2781 The Tuna era has begun. Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: The good ol' state of New Jersey Age: 27 Posts: 1,069 Thanks: 61 Thanked 108 Times in 70 Posts	Of course the asking price would be absurd, Fitzgerald is one of the best receivers in the league. No one is going to get him for cheap. __________________ ALL HAIL TO THE FINS. Where a buck's enough to see their stuff, at the nudie bar.

03-03-2008, 12:30 PM	#4
Vertical Limit Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Miami, FL Age: 21 Posts: 5,729 Thanks: 156 Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts	That's not absurd for arguably the best receiver in the NFL.^ __________________ * Ronnie Brown's lack of production NOT HIS FAULT.

03-03-2008, 12:49 PM	#6
Vertical Limit Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Miami, FL Age: 21 Posts: 5,729 Thanks: 156 Thanked 155 Times in 106 Posts	Well, get him a consistent quarterback and the guy will produce crazy numbers. He's already had two seasons in which he has racked up about 1,400 yards. He isn't Chris Chambers, Chambers is very inconsistent. People use the QB arguement with Chambers all the time, but hell, last year, the Cardinals juggled around Leinart and Warner, and Larry still produced. Then Leinart went down, then Warner with the elbow, and he still produced. If he's not the best receiver in the league, then he's second to Moss. But he's amazing, no doubt. __________________ * Ronnie Brown's lack of production NOT HIS FAULT.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-03-2008, 12:07 PM	#3
TonySporanoTuna Scout Team Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 157 Thanks: 0 Thanked 42 Times in 15 Posts	How absurd? Two firsts absurd?

03-03-2008, 12:36 PM	#5
alen1 The Dreaded One Is Back. Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Central Florida Posts: 1,849 Thanks: 380 Thanked 118 Times in 95 Posts	Best receiver? Whoa Vertical your pushing to the Limit.

03-03-2008, 01:05 PM	#7
alen1 The Dreaded One Is Back. Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Central Florida Posts: 1,849 Thanks: 380 Thanked 118 Times in 95 Posts	I think if you are going to consider anyone the best receiver in the league, it would have to be Torry Holt. Holt is the model of consistency but then again that is just my opinion.