Mark Bradley released by bears - Page 2

huck1974 · 09-23-2008, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlockz

Hmm we have Greg Camirillo starting and u say the bears corps is not much. Camirillo would not make most NFL teams.

You could have said the same thing about a guy named Welker a couple of years ago.

PJack · 09-23-2008, 09:15 PM

Although I would agree that a WR getting released from a relatively weak receiving core sends up a red flag, we should still bring him in to kick the tires. We picked Welker off the scrap heap too!

Ryno14 · 09-23-2008, 09:16 PM

I watched him here in Chicago for a couple of seasons. Alot of potential but injuries slowed him, and I just don't think he really has what it takes. If Wilford can barely stay on the team then I don't think Bradley has a shot to make it. But honestly, if they can run the ball like that every week (which is what we originally expected from them) then I think the receivers we have will develop nicely.

#1dolphinsfan · 09-23-2008, 09:19 PM

if the bears cut a WR then they are no good

dlockz · 09-23-2008, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huck1974

You could have said the same thing about a guy named Welker a couple of years ago.

Welker was much better than Camirillo is. I dont know why everyone wants to make Camirillo the next Welker when he is a poor imitation.
Seriously go back and watch old film of Welker here in Miami. Camirillo is lucky to be on an NFL team. It seems like every castoff could be Welker when in reality they wont be.

finsfan_84 · 09-23-2008, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlockz

Any team that has Greg Camiriilo as a starter better be looking at every release because him leading your team in receiving shows you have a bad corp.

Dude..just becuase he doesnt have a big name, doesnt meant the dude sucks

Greg has played pretty damn well for us the first couple games this season, and im really starting to like him.

dlockz · 09-23-2008, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finsfan_84

Dude..just becuase he doesnt have a big name, doesnt meant the dude sucks

Greg has played pretty damn well for us the first couple games this season, and im really starting to like him.

Its not about the name with me, I just dont think he is very good or should be starting for any team in the NFL. Although I might could say that about any receiver on our roster at this point. You like him thats fine. If thats the talent level of starting wide receiver u want more power to u

Dolfan1000 · 09-23-2008, 09:29 PM

Two comments here. First, Camarillo has done NOTHING but make plays. And you're going to rip on the guy and say he is lucky to be on an NFL roster? Please. Just because he isnt a big name and doesnt get the guys at ESPN excited, you cant give the guy his props? Please. He has done the job. And for the record, a team like NE would snatch him up in a second if he ever hit the market (I dont foresee that happening, the staff seems real fond of him). Its what they do. Nobody wanted Gaffney either, and they made him into a player.

Second, what impact do you REALLY think a new WR will have, coming in during the fourth week of the season? Seriously. He wont get practice reps. He likely wouldnt be active on gameday. You cant just walk in and play. Even some of the guys that have been here throughout TC, throwing with Chad every day, are still getting on the same page with the QB. Any WR added at this point would be inactive, so to think he would even have a CHANCE at starting is laughable. This isnt Madden.

dolfan19 · 09-23-2008, 09:32 PM

Well, the thing is - Camarillo has played pretty damn well. Well enough to beat out more experienced guys for time like Wilford, Hagan and Ginn. He had some nice grabs in the last game and kept the chains moving. Not to mention the damn MVP of last year, based on one play! The guy may not be the most physically gifted of all the receivers in the NFL, but he does well with what he has. And he's improving. Guys who get cut in the middle of the season are generally not guys who are improving.

Also, I guarantee if we were to cut Camarillo - he's on somebody's squad that afternoon.

Ryno14 · 09-23-2008, 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlockz

Its not about the name with me, I just dont think he is very good or should be starting for any team in the NFL. Although I might could say that about any receiver on our roster at this point. You like him thats fine. If thats the talent level of starting wide receiver u want more power to u

Do you really think anyone on this forum would be against better talent at receiver? But what are you proposing to get it? As I've posted before: all the good receivers in the league are on rosters and locked up by their teams. We aren't going to find a game breaker this year. We have to sit back, develop what we have, then next draft or free agency have Ireland and Parcells find some young talent to bring in. Sure, they might bring somebody in during the course of this year, but they won't be pro-bowlers. Like him or not, Camarillo is the best receiver on this team behind Fasano right now, and he has proven it.

Fins05:NewHope · 09-23-2008, 09:46 PM

i say flip that rock, bring him in, you never know if it was the system in chicago, the coaching....you gotta see for yourself.

hemidemon · 09-23-2008, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nasty

you ppl are stupid i like the guy so i think we should bring him in .

Now there is a well thought out and articulated post. You must be very proud.

hemidemon · 09-23-2008, 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bigchub22

isnt that what a message board is for to get other fans opinions? ....and when your coach says to flip every rock maybe the poster just wanted to find out what other fans thought of this rock. Dont like it dont read it

...and that's excatly what I did. Expressed an opinion. Is there a problem bigchub?

FinAtic8480 · 09-23-2008, 09:57 PM

This was the thread I was waiting for. Ginn showed progress Sunday, still he has alot of progress to make. I have to go out of my way and say that Camarillo has been awesome so far, the same goes for Bess. Bess and Camarillo are always moving the chains and catch everything their way.

I would much rather bring a guy like Roydell Williams or Chad Jackson and Brandon London has lots of upside. So, i think we are good at WR not great. I want to see Bess and Camarillo develope and Im hoping Ginn turns in to the WR he is suppose to be, but Im against bringing a WR in especially when guys like Camarillo, Bess and Fasano are playing their ***** off out there.

luduporcu · 09-23-2008, 10:12 PM

1) CAMARILLO has played very well. He's got good size, great hands, plays smart, blocks and is sort of "sneaky fast".

2) Salvation rarely comes off of the waiver wire, especially at this time of the season.

That being said, does anyone know anything about this guy? How big is he? How fast? Does he have good hands? Does he run patterns well? Does he block downfield? Does he play smart? And how hard a worker is he? Anyone know?

09-23-2008, 09:19 PM	#19
#1dolphinsfan Perennial All-Pro Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 3,820 Thanks: 809 Thanked 153 Times in 125 Posts	if the bears cut a WR then they are no good __________________

09-23-2008, 09:57 PM	#29
FinAtic8480 FinHeaven VIP Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Miami Age: 24 Posts: 4,009 Thanks: 1 Thanked 354 Times in 194 Posts	This was the thread I was waiting for. Ginn showed progress Sunday, still he has alot of progress to make. I have to go out of my way and say that Camarillo has been awesome so far, the same goes for Bess. Bess and Camarillo are always moving the chains and catch everything their way. I would much rather bring a guy like Roydell Williams or Chad Jackson and Brandon London has lots of upside. So, i think we are good at WR not great. I want to see Bess and Camarillo develope and Im hoping Ginn turns in to the WR he is suppose to be, but Im against bringing a WR in especially when guys like Camarillo, Bess and Fasano are playing their *** off out there. __________________ Zach Thomas: I played against New England twice a year every year my whole career. I learned to not like that team. I wasn't going to join them.** Jake "The Giant" Long

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-23-2008, 09:15 PM	#17
PJack Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: CT Posts: 543 Thanks: 34 Thanked 36 Times in 30 Posts	Although I would agree that a WR getting released from a relatively weak receiving core sends up a red flag, we should still bring him in to kick the tires. We picked Welker off the scrap heap too!

09-23-2008, 09:16 PM	#18
Ryno14 Scout Team Join Date: Oct 2006 Age: 41 Posts: 82 Thanks: 0 Thanked 20 Times in 6 Posts	I watched him here in Chicago for a couple of seasons. Alot of potential but injuries slowed him, and I just don't think he really has what it takes. If Wilford can barely stay on the team then I don't think Bradley has a shot to make it. But honestly, if they can run the ball like that every week (which is what we originally expected from them) then I think the receivers we have will develop nicely.

09-23-2008, 09:29 PM	#23
Dolfan1000 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 5,449 Thanks: 46 Thanked 273 Times in 161 Posts	Two comments here. First, Camarillo has done NOTHING but make plays. And you're going to rip on the guy and say he is lucky to be on an NFL roster? Please. Just because he isnt a big name and doesnt get the guys at ESPN excited, you cant give the guy his props? Please. He has done the job. And for the record, a team like NE would snatch him up in a second if he ever hit the market (I dont foresee that happening, the staff seems real fond of him). Its what they do. Nobody wanted Gaffney either, and they made him into a player. Second, what impact do you REALLY think a new WR will have, coming in during the fourth week of the season? Seriously. He wont get practice reps. He likely wouldnt be active on gameday. You cant just walk in and play. Even some of the guys that have been here throughout TC, throwing with Chad every day, are still getting on the same page with the QB. Any WR added at this point would be inactive, so to think he would even have a CHANCE at starting is laughable. This isnt Madden.

09-23-2008, 09:32 PM	#24
dolfan19 Starter Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Spartanburg, SC Age: 34 Posts: 392 Thanks: 124 Thanked 172 Times in 75 Posts	Well, the thing is - Camarillo has played pretty damn well. Well enough to beat out more experienced guys for time like Wilford, Hagan and Ginn. He had some nice grabs in the last game and kept the chains moving. Not to mention the damn MVP of last year, based on one play! The guy may not be the most physically gifted of all the receivers in the NFL, but he does well with what he has. And he's improving. Guys who get cut in the middle of the season are generally not guys who are improving. Also, I guarantee if we were to cut Camarillo - he's on somebody's squad that afternoon.

09-23-2008, 09:46 PM	#26
Fins05:NewHope Long Time Veteran Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Toledo, Ohio Age: 38 Posts: 1,124 Thanks: 29 Thanked 43 Times in 20 Posts	i say flip that rock, bring him in, you never know if it was the system in chicago, the coaching....you gotta see for yourself.

09-23-2008, 10:12 PM	#30
luduporcu Rookie Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 51 Thanks: 0 Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts	1) CAMARILLO has played very well. He's got good size, great hands, plays smart, blocks and is sort of "sneaky fast". 2) Salvation rarely comes off of the waiver wire, especially at this time of the season. That being said, does anyone know anything about this guy? How big is he? How fast? Does he have good hands? Does he run patterns well? Does he block downfield? Does he play smart? And how hard a worker is he? Anyone know?