Benefits from the Jake Long Selection - Page 2

Philter25 · 04-22-2008, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FinFanatic80

5. His overall money is less than Russell's from last year.

Thats a nice political spin on it. Russell signed a 6 year deal, Long signed a 5 year deal. Look at the averages, not the total value.

FinFanatic80 · 04-22-2008, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philter25

Thats a nice political spin on it. Russell signed a 6 year deal, Long signed a 5 year deal. Look at the averages, not the total value.

No kidding ... but ultimately it was a win for the FO.

Crazy685 · 04-22-2008, 04:31 PM

Considering Calvin Johnson signed a 6 year 62 million dollar deal with 27.5 guaranteed as the 2nd overall player in LAST YEARS draft, I'd say we did DAMN good signing Jake Long to the contract that we did as the following years #1 overall

The Juggernaut · 04-22-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazy685

Considering Calvin Johnson signed a 6 year 62 million dollar deal with 27.5 guaranteed as the 2nd overall player in LAST YEARS draft, I'd say we did DAMN good signing Jake Long to the contract that we did as the following years #1 overall

Once again a 6 year deal of course the amount guaranteed will be higher than if that deal was a 5 year deal. At best this deal was the standard increase from year to year but considering its a OL compared to a QB and that he got it done this early, Jake's agent Condon comes out on top in this one.

Bettor Days · 04-22-2008, 08:04 PM

Does anyone think this will start a mad dash for O-lineman leaving us with some good Defensive players for round 2?

Mile High Fin · 05-09-2008, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bettor Days

Does anyone think this will start a mad dash for O-lineman leaving us with some good Defensive players for round 2?

Nice insight.

I'd guess maybe Philip Merling.

SR 7 · 05-09-2008, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FinFanatic80

1. He immediately helps open holes for the strength of our offense, the running game.

2. He will help in pass protection so that Beck has more time in the pocket and also advance his development as a quarterback.

3. Selecting an OT now, allows us to go best-player-available at pick #32 more than it would if we picked someone else.

4. He's a much safer pick than any of the other players. If he doesnt pan out at LT he can play other O-Line positions which can not be said about McFadden, Ryan, Gholston, or Chris.

5. His overall money is less than Russell's from last year.

the most important part, he gives us the chance to have a FRANCHISE LT!!!! we dont have nething FRANCHISE ON THIS ROSTER BUT HIM AND MAYBE 1 QB. thast it. 2 of the most important spots on a team. but either way, its a possible FRANCHISE LT! SICKK!

NorFlaFin · 05-09-2008, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rdandinches

Which makes signing J.Long even more important, if VC wants a billion dollars we'll let him go and fill in the RT spot easy with a FA or mid round draft pick. Then as a bonus we'll get a 3rd round comp. pick for losing him to FA.

On the flip side if VC signs we have bookend OT's for years to come, that to me is a win win situation. Great move by the FO !

That's what the franchise tag is made for.

JDOE · 05-09-2008, 07:55 PM

I admit I wanted Chris Long with the number 1 overall, but in hindsight, the Fins made a very good move getting Jake Long. The run on o-linemen in the first round would have made their following picks reaches instead of BPA's.

Good job Sparano, Parcells and Company!

At least I don't have to see Chris Long in a jersey of a team I loathe.

And I admit the matchup of Jake Long vs. Gholston should be entertaining for years to come, not to mention the possibility of Henne being paired with his college buddy.

finfan54 · 05-09-2008, 08:09 PM

If we were to lose VC, I would not worry under this regime. I would worry if it were Cammyboy/JJ/Pornstache

GCD960 · 05-09-2008, 09:06 PM

When was the last time a T of VC's caliber hit the FA market? It just doesnt happen or we would have signed them.

SR 7 · 05-10-2008, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by finfan54

If we were to lose VC, I would not worry under this regime. I would worry if it were Cammyboy/JJ/Pornstache

im sorry but lMAOOOOOOOOO to pornstache! i was dying laughinggg

3rdandinches · 05-10-2008, 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NorFlaFin

That's what the franchise tag is made for.

Only if you think he's worth top five money, otherwise if you can't sign him for less you let him go.

NorFlaFin · 05-10-2008, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3rdandinches

Only if you think he's worth top five money, otherwise if you can't sign him for less you let him go.

That's only part of my point, if VC or his Agent refuses. Using the tag or tender allows the Phins to get something for him.

05-09-2008, 07:55 PM	#24
JDOE Don't make me laugh! Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Indiana Age: 33 Posts: 160 Credits: 126,804 Thanks: 13 Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts	I admit I wanted Chris Long with the number 1 overall, but in hindsight, the Fins made a very good move getting Jake Long. The run on o-linemen in the first round would have made their following picks reaches instead of BPA's. Good job Sparano, Parcells and Company! At least I don't have to see Chris Long in a jersey of a team I loathe. And I admit the matchup of Jake Long vs. Gholston should be entertaining for years to come, not to mention the possibility of Henne being paired with his college buddy. __________________ Call me "Mr. Optimism", but I'm going on record and saying the Fins go 9-7 in 2008! This team is already a lot better than many people realize.

05-09-2008, 09:06 PM	#26
GCD960 The Pats are Perfect Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: I'm over here now Posts: 3,028 Credits: 1,380 Thanks: 6 Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts	When was the last time a T of VC's caliber hit the FA market? It just doesnt happen or we would have signed them. __________________ Seriously, did you have to quote that long as post?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-22-2008, 04:31 PM	#18
Crazy685 Seasoned Veteran Join Date: Aug 2006 Age: 23 Posts: 680 Credits: 1,135 Thanks: 10 Thanked 64 Times in 41 Posts	Considering Calvin Johnson signed a 6 year 62 million dollar deal with 27.5 guaranteed as the 2nd overall player in LAST YEARS draft, I'd say we did DAMN good signing Jake Long to the contract that we did as the following years #1 overall

04-22-2008, 08:04 PM	#20
Bettor Days Scout Team Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Downtown Miami, Fl. Posts: 59 Credits: 1,055 Thanks: 6 Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts	Does anyone think this will start a mad dash for O-lineman leaving us with some good Defensive players for round 2?

05-09-2008, 08:09 PM	#25
finfan54 Zachattack Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: CRAPCHESTER Posts: 12,425 Credits: 1,689 Thanks: 0 Thanked 39 Times in 31 Posts	If we were to lose VC, I would not worry under this regime. I would worry if it were Cammyboy/JJ/Pornstache