Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
Since the merger of the AFL and NFL, how many teams went to more than 3 superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
How many teams went to 3 or more consecutive superbowls in a 10 year span and who were they?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Props to In Flames for the SICK SIG!
since 1970, these teams have gone to more than three SB in a 10 year span since merger (6)
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by FINintheMOON
Dallas, 1970-1978 (70,71,75,77,78)
Pittsburgh, 1974-1979 (74,75,78,79)
Washington 1982-1991 (82,83,87,91)
San Francisco 1981-1989 (81,84,88,89)
Buffalo 1990-1993 (90,91,92,93)
New England 1996-2004 (96,01,03,04)
I think that`s all of them. I wouldn`t consider Buffalo a dinasty (no titles) but you just said teams that WENT to the SB. the 90`s cowboys are considered a dinasty, but they only went to three SBs
as for the second question, only two teams have gone to three or more straight SBs and those are Miami, 1971-1973 and Buffalo, 1990-1993.
failure has many excuses . . . . . . . success has no explanation
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Phin19
id say youve got it covered there for sure.
F-A-L
how is buffalo not a dynasty? no other team has done (or in all liklihood will do) what they did.
I find it odd that you consider the Pats 10 year dynasty from 96-04 instead of 01-07.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Phin19
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No doubt is it impressive, but they were never the best and I think that is very important when considering dynasties.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by mnofdichotomy
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Vikings went to four Super Bowls in the 70s.
69-70 vs. KC (Super Bowl IV)
73-74 vs. MIA (Super Bowl VIII)
74-75 vs. PIT (Super Bowl IX)
76-77 vs. OAK (Super Bowl XI)
"I told the team 7-9 is mediocre, and mediocrity is not going to be accepted here" - Tony Sparano
"Well the cool breeze came on Tuesday, And the corn's a bumper crop
And the fields are full of dancin' Full of singin' and romancin'
The music never stopped." - Bob Weir
Going to 3 SBs in a 10 year span is not a dynasty.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by FINintheMOON
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
lol I posted that in january 2006, But you're right 01-07 makes a lot more sense today.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by TheDon74
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Don't see anyone mentioning the Dolphins.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by FINintheMOON
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
72, lost to Dallas
73, beat the Vikings
74, beat the Redskins
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks