Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Are we 2 million under the cap?

  1. -21
    Clumpy's Avatar
    is Clumpalicious!!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2001
    Posts:
    9,330
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Clumptowaga
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Players earned bonuses based on winning games......these are NLTBE incentives...most of them count on the following yrs cap......Miami's adjusted salary cap will be $9-10 million LOWER than the league wide unadjusted salary cap.

  2. -22
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    437
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    21.9 over according to Clayton. Tell me he is mistaken.

  3. -23
    Scott Andrew's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2004
    Posts:
    670
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Canada
    Thanks / No Thanks
    So who is right... Clumpy or Clayton?

  4. -24
    Flying Pencil's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2005
    Posts:
    88
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Scott Andrew
    So who is right... Clumpy or Clayton?
    They're both saying pretty much the same thing.

    Some players had bonuses for a winning 2005 season in their contracts. Since we had finished 4-12 in 2004, these bonuses were considered Not-Likely-To-Be-Earned (NLTBE) incentives and were not counted on the 2005 cap. Since we finished 9-7, those bonuses kicked in and were brought forward as a negative adjustment on our 2006 cap.

    Additionally, since we're coming off a 9-7 2005, any player with a similar bonus this year would have it considered Likely-To-Be-Earned (LTBE) and have it count against the cap as well. However, that would be because it was added to their salary.

    Unadjusted Leaguewide Cap Limit ($95 mill.)
    - previous year's NLTBE incentives that were met ($9+ mill.)
    + previous year's LTBE incentives that were missed ($?)

    Adjusted Cap Limit ($85-86 million)

    This is a reduction in the amount of cap money we're allowed to spend. This is not cap relief.

  5. -25
    gator_sensation's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    1,196
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    University of Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    According to ESPN, we should be under the cap with the cuts we just made.


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. -26
    aquawave's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    202
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Flying Pencil
    They're both saying pretty much the same thing.

    Some players had bonuses for a winning 2005 season in their contracts. Since we had finished 4-12 in 2004, these bonuses were considered Not-Likely-To-Be-Earned (NLTBE) incentives and were not counted on the 2005 cap. Since we finished 9-7, those bonuses kicked in and were brought forward as a negative adjustment on our 2006 cap.

    Additionally, since we're coming off a 9-7 2005, any player with a similar bonus this year would have it considered Likely-To-Be-Earned (LTBE) and have it count against the cap as well. However, that would be because it was added to their salary.

    Unadjusted Leaguewide Cap Limit ($95 mill.)
    - previous year's NLTBE incentives that were met ($9+ mill.)
    + previous year's LTBE incentives that were missed ($?)

    Adjusted Cap Limit ($85-86 million)

    This is a reduction in the amount of cap money we're allowed to spend. This is not cap relief.

    OK, that makes sense now

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •