FF Index ranks the NFL's offensive lines:

[Clumpy]

Originally posted by zachseau13


1st of all your numbers are wrong!

2nd 8 games you allowed 24 sacks, not 21.

You also had fewer passing attempts. A more accurate statistic would be sacks per attempt which went from 9.43% (30/318) in the first 8 games to 8.22% (24/292) in the 2nd 8 games.

A small improvement.

Still a pathetic performance.

Miami allowed 25 sacks, for the entire year (1.56 per game), on 455 attempts for a ratio of 5.5%.

I used the numbers from ESPN.com and I know how to add. I went week to week through last season's results. Now if another source has 24, then one of them is obviously incorrect.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Clumpy]

A more accurate relationship of OL ability:

OL ability=atalent + bOLcoach + cdefenses faced + dQB ability + fRB ability + e

That's a multi-variate regression relationship. So many variables to accurately analyze any position, but I use the same logic I read here, so regression models may be a bit too much.

[Dolfan984]

Take out the KC and Buffalo 1/2 game and he's the #3 rated QB in the league with a 93.8. But guess what, you can't take out games. All of them count. Neither of us made the playoffs.

[zach13]

Originally posted by clumpedplatelet


I used the numbers from ESPN.com and I know how to add. I went week to week through last season's results. Now if another source has 24, then one of them is obviously incorrect.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

So sorry, but you are still wrong!!!!!!!!!!

According to ESPN.com

" SACK
GAMES 1-8 30
GAMES 9-16 24 "

And, oh yeah, I took statistics too. But the first rule of statistics is to make sure your underlying data is correct.

Check it again, genius