Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Which teams stand out in the "Suck 4 Luck Sweepstakes"?

  1. 07-30-2011, 09:27 PM -11
    NorFlaFin
    NorFlaFin's Avatar
    PowerHungryMo'fo
    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2004
    Posts:
    3,538
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by rickd13
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    1. Cincinnati 2. Washington 3. San Francisco 4. Carolina 5. Denver 6. Arizona 7.Miami ( I hate to say it, but the division and conference is tough, and I just do not have confidence in the QB situation.)
    'Nati, Carolina, Denver, Arizona, all have young developing QB's

    Suck for Luck includes Miami, Deadskins, Seachickens and maybe the Jills.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
  2. 07-31-2011, 09:24 PM -12
    rickd13
    Scout Team
    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2005
    Posts:
    801
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Rochester, New York
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by NorFlaFin
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    'Nati, Carolina, Denver, Arizona, all have young developing QB's

    Suck for Luck includes Miami, Deadskins, Seachickens and maybe the Jills.
    I was just listing the teams in order of who I thought would have the worst records. I was not taking need at QB into account. I know that Carolina and , most likely, Arizona wouldn't take a QB, but just about any of those other teams, including Denver and Cincinnati could.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote  
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules