Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: i don't think they could mess up this draft if they wanted to...

  1. -21
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2005
    Posts:
    2,713
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Coples is very risky IMO, but I do love his talent. Another potential Miami target Ryan Tannehill is intriguing even though #8/9 is a tad high for him. Lots of good solid picks, though, so I agree with you there.

  2. -22
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2005
    Posts:
    2,713
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by The Confessor
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Its not so much that I don't like RGIII. IF he falls to say? 7th, then I'm all for a trade IF that is what Philbin believes as I trust his QB instincts quite a bit.
    Those same "experts" you tout have to make something, even if its from nothing. Obviously he won the Heisman, but what exactly does THAT prove???

    The kid looks like a pretty good prospect, and living in Dallas, I have seen LOTS from RGIII, but, there is no way I condone giving the front end of two consecutive drafts for the kid. Not even close. He is a great athlete, but so are lots of guys playing QB in College. Until I see him rip apart a top-notch defense from a Pro-type set I hold lots of maybe's about how he will pan out.
    He didn't face many daunting Defenses the entire season, and I also saw a few games where he looked mediocre at best against not such great competition.

    Whatever we change this offseason, it needs to be good for 6 or so wins. IF we trade away the entire draft (Not to mention next years) for RGIII, it lands pretty much on his shoulders alone. He's simply not that good IMHO.
    It's a fair debate to be sure. I like Robert Griffin III and would give up a lot for him maybe something like 2 #1's and a #2. I know that is a lot but I don't think it restricts the organization that much and won't be noticed at all if he proves to be a franchise qb. If we are unable to sign Matt Flynn or Peyton Manning (I personally think he's done) then the organization has to look hard at Griffin. Next in line is Ryan Tannehill, who I like quite a bit, but needs to sit for a year. Kirk Cousins is probably my next guy and he could be good if you load up talent around him. It is a tough call for this organization and one they have to get right.

  3. -23
    2413fanphins's Avatar
    Super Donator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    5,790
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Central iowa
    Thanks / No Thanks
    the more I think about it the more I smell trade down. if we trade down 5-10 spots, and pick up an additional 2nd rounder, this is the year to do it.

    if they cut bell, mark barron could come into play around 20

    upshaw could still be in the mix in the mid to late teens.
    cordy glenn, mike adams could be a pick to shore up the RG or RT spot.

    whitney mercilus could be in play for the defense if we are going to a hybrid type

    peter konz and move pouncey... probably not but maybe...

    point being. we could land one of these guys in the first and have two second rounders to fill some holes.

    take a te with the first pick in the second. the big three will probably still be available. tannehill, or weeden or another qb prospect with either the first or 2nd second round pick. cam johnson, vinny curry, zebrie sanders, osemele kelechi... I'd be really impressed if we got some of these dudes with our first three picks. I'm not head over heels for anybody at 8 or 9. I'm usually not a proponent for trading down, this year, I think it makes more sense than years past.

  4. -24
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,333
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by 2413fanphins
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    the more I think about it the more I smell trade down. if we trade down 5-10 spots, and pick up an additional 2nd rounder, this is the year to do it.

    if they cut bell, mark barron could come into play around 20

    upshaw could still be in the mix in the mid to late teens.
    cordy glenn, mike adams could be a pick to shore up the RG or RT spot.

    whitney mercilus could be in play for the defense if we are going to a hybrid type

    peter konz and move pouncey... probably not but maybe...

    point being. we could land one of these guys in the first and have two second rounders to fill some holes.

    take a te with the first pick in the second. the big three will probably still be available. tannehill, or weeden or another qb prospect with either the first or 2nd second round pick. cam johnson, vinny curry, zebrie sanders, osemele kelechi... I'd be really impressed if we got some of these dudes with our first three picks. I'm not head over heels for anybody at 8 or 9. I'm usually not a proponent for trading down, this year, I think it makes more sense than years past.
    Trading down isn't as easy as some think. There has to be somebody at our spot that another team is willing to move up to get and outside of Coples possibly falling, I just don't see it.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.






  5. -25
    2413fanphins's Avatar
    Super Donator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    5,790
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Central iowa
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Ireland seems to have a knack.for jostling draff position. We will have to see. You may be right

  6. -26
    umpalu's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2005
    Posts:
    1,247
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    WE are the dolphins. Yes we can.


  7. -27
    normaniii's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    1,832
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    wales and will die a proud dragon
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Why trade down?

    The Steelers, Giants & Ravens have a philosophy of drafting BPA. When that BPA, most likely Riley Reiff, also fills a position of need, probably the weakest position, why not take it?

    I understand after the Sparano years many are sick of numerous Offensive lineman, but, new regime, new coaching staff, select the BPA and move on.

  8. -28
    2413fanphins's Avatar
    Super Donator

    Status:
    Online
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    5,790
    vCash:
    1000
    Loc:
    Central iowa
    Thanks / No Thanks
    as a hawkeye fan and native of iowa, I can't get too jacked up about reiff. I'd rather go pass rusher and grab a wisconsin Ol in the 2nd round.

    I don't know who we take as a pass rusher in the second if we take reiff in round one. I like the pass rusher as a first priority over a RT.

    I understand your argument about taking BPA and your probably right, but with all the talent this year, I think two 2nd rounders would be okay with me.

  9. -29
    hooshoops's Avatar
    there's no shame in this game

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    24,501
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks
    only way i see us having a trade down partner is if someone comes up for trent richardson if he's on the board...how high he goes depends on that 40...
    hoops scoops...prospects mia should target top 4 rounds 2013 draft...

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  10. -30
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,333
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by 2413fanphins
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Ireland seems to have a knack.for jostling draff position. We will have to see. You may be right
    Trading in the first round is a whole different ball game than trading in later rounds, and he hasn't done it yet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •