To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Originally Posted by
The New Guy
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The point is they might have beat them had Henne played the whole game. They beat the Jets twice and NE which was better than Pitt that year.
7-9 is just as good as 10-6. And when that 7-9 team loses to that 10-6 team 41-7, you are still just as good as the 7-9 team. Makes perfect sense to me.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Are you saying Seattle was better than NO as well?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No, my #'s are correct. NE did not beat Den that year. They beat 4 .500 teams or better, just like they did in 08 without Brady.
No, I honestly don't think they would have won more than 11 games. They still would have split with the Dolphins and Jets. Indy had won the last 2 out of 3 with Brady at QB, Pitt was the Super Bowl Champs that year, and the Chargers always play them tough in SD.
The 08 Pats without Brady won 4 games against teams that were .500 or better and finished with an 11-5 record. The 09 PAts with Brady won 4 games against teams that were .500 or better and only won 10 games. Again, I will take the team in my division that wins less games regardless of who the QB is.
You know it just like you know the sideline rule is separate, it wasn't a catch, it wasn't a safety ect..... Your bias for the Jets and against other teams blind you from reality.
Being let into the playoffs and then beating a dead team walking and then an overrated SD team who missed 3 FGs in a 3 point loss is hardly proving anything.
Bookmarks