Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Long's contract expires after 2013, not 2012

  1. -11
    Locke's Avatar
    I'm not your hero.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    7,677
    vCash:
    30600
    Loc:
    Albuquerque, NM
    Thanks / No Thanks
    There is no way we can go into 2013 with Long's cap hit being 13 million. An extension has to happen next off season if we want any room to maneuver...

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    If I could take your pain and frame it, and hang it on my wall,
    maybe you would never have to hurt again...


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -12
    DolfanDuBbZ~'s Avatar
    Speaking nonsense since 2008

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2008
    Posts:
    4,246
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Long is entering his prime, and has NO incentive to restructure. You either pay him his rookie contract or franchise him when the time comes.

    I swear some people here live in fantasy land. Why would Long, on his rookie contract, take less money? No freaking way.

  3. -13
    hooshoops's Avatar
    there's no shame in this game

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    24,537
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Locke
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    There is no way we can go into 2013 with Long's cap hit being 13 million. An extension has to happen next off season if we want any room to maneuver...
    and thats when it will get done...prior to 2013...provided he plays at a high level in 2012
    hoops scoops...prospects mia should target top 4 rounds 2013 draft...

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  4. -14
    foozool13's Avatar
    #13

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2005
    Posts:
    3,642
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    CONCUR


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by DolfanDuBbZ~
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Long is entering his prime, and has NO incentive to restructure. You either pay him his rookie contract or franchise him when the time comes.

    I swear some people here live in fantasy land. Why would Long, on his rookie contract, take less money? No freaking way.
    ^^^ Yeah That
    4/11/2013 - "26 minutes with Ireland today and not one question about Quarterback position. Probably the first time since Marino days." - Ben Volin

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. -15
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2009
    Posts:
    926
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    In theory you could re-structure Jake Long's contract this offseason to pay him more money over the next two years than his existing contract pays but count less against the cap for those two years. Of course he then becomes very expensive in a few years but it's frequently done by teams near their cap limit

  6. -16
    DolfanDuBbZ~'s Avatar
    Speaking nonsense since 2008

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Nov 2008
    Posts:
    4,246
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Doctor Phibes
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    In theory you could re-structure Jake Long's contract this offseason to pay him more money over the next two years than his existing contract pays but count less against the cap for those two years. Of course he then becomes very expensive in a few years but it's frequently done by teams near their cap limit

    No way he restructures. Long being a dominate LT and a former #1 overall pick, will be paid. There are others on this team you could approach to save money. But Long isn't one of them.

  7. -17
    Tunaphish429's Avatar
    1st Ballot Hall of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2009
    Posts:
    8,452
    vCash:
    17100
    Loc:
    CUSE
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Great news...If we can redo his deal and add years that would be great..but I doubt his camp is gonna wanna do that.

  8. -18
    hooshoops's Avatar
    there's no shame in this game

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    24,537
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    richmond va
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Doctor Phibes
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    In theory you could re-structure Jake Long's contract this offseason to pay him more money over the next two years than his existing contract pays but count less against the cap for those two years. Of course he then becomes very expensive in a few years but it's frequently done by teams near their cap limit
    yeah you could do that and you could create a situation where you put yourself in salary cap hell down the line as a result...

  9. -19
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2009
    Posts:
    926
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by DolfanDuBbZ~
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    No way he restructures. Long being a dominate LT and a former #1 overall pick, will be paid. There are others on this team you could approach to save money. But Long isn't one of them.
    How is it then that any star player extends a contract with his current team ? Why don't they all just wait for free agency ?

  10. -20
    Dominate's Avatar
    I just want to WIN !

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    565
    vCash:
    800
    Loc:
    South Dakota
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by DolfanDuBbZ~
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Long is entering his prime, and has NO incentive to restructure. You either pay him his rookie contract or franchise him when the time comes.

    I swear some people here live in fantasy land. Why would Long, on his rookie contract, take less money? No freaking way.
    You are right in that he has no real incentive to restructure, but you should know that restructuring a contract does not necessarily mean taking a paycut. I'm no capologist, but contract restructures are frequently done which actually benefit the player and also helps reduce the salary cap hit. I do know that at times it can be a risky deal because it has the potential to cause cap problems in the later years of the deal.

    Not saying that it is possible or applicable in Long's case because I really don't know all the details of his contract, but I've seen it done quite often.

    Example....Off ESPN....The Steelers are fairly active in this practice this offseason:

    "Quarterback
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    and linebacker
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    are willing to restructure their contracts to help the Steelers get under the salary cap by March 13, the agents for both players told the
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    .


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    By my projection, the Steelers could trim between $6 million to $7 million off the salary cap by reworking the deals of Roethlisberger and Harrison. Those would be significant moves for the Steelers, who are about $11 million over the cap right now.

    Pittsburgh has already restructured the contracts for linebackers
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    and
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    as well as cornerback
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    , which saved them $14 million against the cap.

    What does this all mean? Pittsburgh is reducing the players' cap numbers by turning base salaries into bonuses. For instance, Woodley's 2012 cap number was chopped from $11.5 million to $4.9 million -- a savings of $6.6 million -- because they converted most of this year's salary and a roster bonus into a $8.2 million up-front payment. That $8.2 million gets pro-rated over the five years remaining on his contract, so that's an additional $1.6 million added to his cap numbers in 2012 to 2016.

    Essentially, the Steelers are reducing cap hits in 2012 by pushing them off into future years. The hope is that the NFL salary cap will increase each year, so these restructured contracts won't handcuff the team next season and beyond. Where restructuring can hurt a team is when it cuts a player who has multiple years left on his contract because all of the cap acceleration hits at once."
    Last edited by Dominate; 02-16-2012 at 03:05 PM.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •