Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: FAKE STORY: Per Adam shelter Miami trying to trade bush

  1. -41
    fairbanksb's Avatar
    Panhandler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2003
    Posts:
    1,797
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by hpythons
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I agree Trade Bush while his value is high.
    Right, Jake Long too and I'll bet we can get something for Pouncey and Dansby. Geesh.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -42
    fish920's Avatar
    lurker

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    618
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    St.Petersburg
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Why would this be such a horrible decision? He had a DECENT year last year and i guarantee his value right now is probably the highest its ever going to be.

    Trade him for some picks and lets start DRAFTING our superbowl roster!!!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Fireman ed looks like my kneecap

  3. -43
    fish920's Avatar
    lurker

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    618
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    St.Petersburg
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I say trade him while his value is high because in my opinion if healthy all year i think daniel T can do better.

    They did re-sign slaton. . .

  4. -44
    fish920's Avatar
    lurker

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    618
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    St.Petersburg
    Thanks / No Thanks
    my bad lol

  5. -45
    Nublar7's Avatar
    FinHeaven Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    31,439
    vCash:
    2469400
    Loc:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I can't believe some of you are so gullible to fake Twitter accounts. Before even confirming whether this is true or not, you begin to bash. Good lesson for some of you not to jump to conclusions.

    This thread is going to spam.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. -46
    Travis34's Avatar
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    4,219
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Churubusco, Indiana
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by nick1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    For what? If its for good value i cant disagree. Reggie bush had a great year which may not happen twice. Get good value for him whiile you can. The guy from the CFL makes bush expandable. Hes a beast. Daniel Thomas is the future along with him not bush. Stock pile draft picks
    Bush is not replaceable by Thomas, let alone Messam. He's never had a damn NFL snap. The only way I would see this is a good move would be if we got Richardson in return but then we have other holes too.

    Hopefully it is false

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  7. -47
    Specialk0832's Avatar
    Running @ 24 FPS

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    1,081
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Orlando
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by massi20
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    probably want to draft Richardson.
    In this day and age, every team needs 2 solid RB's MINIMUM, possibly even 3.
    Look at the saints, Sproles, Ingram, Pierre Thomas.

    Yet we're getting rid of our lone 1,000yd rusher? Bush may not be a #1 on most teams, or any for that matter, but he is OUR #1 back. D Thomas can't be relied upon so far. We have no clue about our new CFL back.

    If we are trying to get Richardson, okay, why not hold on to bush for a legit 2 headed monster?

    Is Richardson going to produce #'s himself and make up the loss of 1,000 as well? Highly doubtful.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •