What I want to know is why this thread was moved off the main board.
Maybe because it's the TRUTH... and truth hurts some people.
You HAVE to try for the best you can possibly get at QB, and Tannehill is that guy this year. Settling for a low-round guy is STUPID and INSANE. There are not any more Bradys out there, that is an utter FANTASY.
QB is a PREMIUM position, HANG the "value" junk and get the best QB available.
Ryan Tannehill. Ah, what a relief. Life is good.
Because its a draft thread. Geez, where is the common sense on this site?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by iwastherein72
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The cynic knows the price of everything, but the value of nothing
-Oscar Wilde
Does he act, sing and dance?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Big Daddy 13
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Yep. You have to trust your coaches and FO. They live and die by the QB decisions they make. However, if you don't invest a high draft pick on a QB, you will likely never find one. Always waiting for 'next year' isn't a plan either. Searching in scrap heaps yr after yr reduces your odds.
The reason it was moved here is because we do not have a section called "Another Tannehill Thread".
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by iwastherein72
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The difference between QB's at this level is their preperation. Most of these guys have similar abilities, but some put in "Tom Brady" work/ethic and some put in "Akilli Smith" work/effort.
Luckily with Tannehill we have a offensive coordinator that spent alot of time with him and knows first hand what kind of worker he is.
Once again, Mallett dropped due to character concerns and his admitted drug use. However, he is not a WCO QB. He is a tall statue with a good arm. No one knows yet if he has the instincts, intelligence or mental toughness to be an upper echelon starter in the NFL and sitting behind Brady (or any other good QB) doesn't make you one. Just ask Curtis Painter
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by satz
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
this
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by jlfin
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sherman knows RT better than anybody... if he has the potential to be a franchise QB he WORTH be selected at 8 overall
This^^^ If the staff thinks there is any decent chance he will develop into a good NFL starting QB we will take him. If you think people are down on the Fins now, imagine what fan support would be like three years from now if we don't take him, and he's playing at or near a Pro Bowl level.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by Armand
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks