Forbes: Smallest Govt spender since Eisenhower? Obama.

[Locke]

It’s enough to make even the most ardent Obama cynic scratch his head in confusion.

Amidst all the cries of
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
being the most prolific big government spender the nation has ever suffered,
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
is reporting that our president has actually been tighter with a buck than any United States president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Who knew?

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[tylerdolphin]

So if Im understanding this correctly (and I very well may not be), they are basing the spending numbers on a baseline that the previous president set. So basically Obama spent less over the previous guy than any other president. Considering the moron he followed, Im not sure thats a feather in his cap. You dont solve a spending problem by spending just a little more than the other guy.

[LANGER72]

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



Richard "Rick" Ungar (born in
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
in 1950) is a contributor to Forbes.com and the Washington Monthly where he writes on American health care policy and politics. He additionally appears weekly as the liberal voice of the "Forbes on Fox" television show and as a political pundit on other television and radio programs. Ungar moved into the world of journalism after a long career as a creative writer and executive producer in television.


Enough said.

[Locke]

I knew it was going to happen. Without fail, someone comes in and blasts the author and ignores the facts. How about some substance Langer...?

[tylerdolphin]

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



Richard "Rick" Ungar (born in
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
in 1950) is a contributor to Forbes.com and the Washington Monthly where he writes on American health care policy and politics. He additionally appears weekly as the liberal voice of the "Forbes on Fox" television show and as a political pundit on other television and radio programs. Ungar moved into the world of journalism after a long career as a creative writer and executive producer in television.


Enough said.

So we should ignore anything Bill O'reilly says because hes a Republican voice and should definitely ignore anything you have to say being that youre our Republican voice on this board. Got it.

[LANGER72]

I knew it was going to happen. Without fail, someone comes in and blasts the author and ignores the facts. How about some substance Langer...?

I would rather tangle your lines and steal your bait...lol
It's a long holiday weekend, I really don't want to get into another long debate right now.
My wife has a long list of honey-do's..
Punching holes into your thread requires diligent research...lol

[Dogbone34]

stop

this is silly. it does not include stimulus.

[LANGER72]

So we should ignore anything Bill O'reilly says because hes a Republican voice and should definitely ignore anything you have to say being that youre our Republican voice on this board. Got it.

Take it easy. I am trying to be civil.
If you want to ignore me, that is fine.

[tylerdolphin]

Take it easy. I am trying to be civil.
If you want to ignore me, that is fine.

I wasnt trying to be uncivil
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Just pointing out the natural progression of your logic.

[Locke]

stop

this is silly. it does not include stimulus.

He mentions the stimulus in the article...