I'll eventually study the other QBs in his era to see how they match up. His stats are **** and if the other QBs in his era's stats are also **** and they're in the HOF, hell, put him in there too. Why not?
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by nyjunc
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
he's not a HOFer but he wasn't a bad QB- just like Eli.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Check this out
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by nyjunc
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
An interesting take by a fan
No hurry, but considering where we are in the season, and who's left standing, I think it's a relatively interesting point that I haven't heard brought up prior to my doing so this evening.
Plunkett is worth the discussion, but I'm not sure it's more relevant since he's been retired for 25 years.
.500 career win %.
52.5% passer
sub 70 rating
7.0 YPA
34 more INTs than TDs in his career.
Never once started a full season for the Raiders, save for the strike-shortened 1982 season.
In his best season, 1983...
10-3
60.7%
2935 Yds
20/18 TD/INT
7.7 YPA
82.7 Rate
10.0 Sk%
5.1 Adjusted Net YPA
2 Super Bowls gave him a small piece of discussion, but his numbers, even when adjusted for era, just never added up.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks