Chuck Norris accueses Obama for pushing pro-gay agenda to the Boy Scouts

[Spesh]

As others have stated, i have no problem with Norris expressing his views even if i dont agree with them. That being said, im not sure how anyone can firmly agree with him when his points are expressed as:

Norris’ column comes in response to a statement released last month by Boy Scouts board member James Turley, who vowed to work from within to change the group’s policy of prohibiting gay scout leaders.
Norris, however, suspects Obama is behind his change of heart. “But is Turley working on his own initiative,” Norris asks, “or has the White House prodded him with perks and favors?”
Norris makes few direct accusations. Instead, he asks a long series of pointed -- and conspiracy-minded -- questions, including: “Is it a coincidence that Turley just announced his resignation as CEO of Ernst & Young (effective June 2013) and that he now is offering the White House a parting pro-gay BSA gift in gratitude for all its presidential favors to him and Ernst & Young over the past few years?”
Turley announced his upcoming retirement last November .

Instead of showing even a ounce of facts, he makes wild accusations and simply asks a handful of conspiracy theory "questions" to back them up. Again, its his right to say these things, no problem there. The thing i roll my eyes at is people believing him. Then again, Glenn Beck has made a career using these tactics, nothing new.

[LANGER72]

Having gay(cookie monsters) men running scout troops is just wrong. A wolf in the chicken coop. "Another brick in the wall".
The army can be gay, but I think the line has to be drawn when dealing with minors.
One of the tenets of the BSA is to be morally straight. Having gays anywhere near a scout troop violates their rules.
The Obama administration twists and distorts... to accomplish their political objectives.
Norris makes some accusations to bring some liberal media attention to the issue. It worked. The bee hive of objective thinking here has been disturbed.
Norris has credibility...he has absolutely nothing to gain. Obama and Turley and have agendas.

We disagree again...nothing new nere.

[Gonzo]

Having gay(cookie monsters) men running scout troops is just wrong. A wolf in the chicken coop. "Another brick in the wall".
The army can be gay, but I think the line has to be drawn when dealing with minors.
One of the tenets of the BSA is to be morally straight. Having gays anywhere near a scout troop violates their rules.
The Obama administration twists and distorts... to accomplish their political objectives.
Norris makes some accusations to bring some liberal media attention to the issue. It worked. The bee hive of objective thinking here has been disturbed.
Norris has credibility...he has absolutely nothing to gain. Obama and Turley and have agendas.

We disagree again...nothing new nere.

Ah, the child predators are gay schtick. Good old hate. What will happen when gay-bashing goes the way of racial slurs? Who will we turn our hatred on then? Let me add that to the other "blah blahs." Blah blah blah liberals blah blah blah gay=child predator blah blah blah lefties...

Saying we disagree isn't entirely accurate. Some of us are forming individual views and capable of individual thought vs others who are just spouting the party talking points. IMO, agreement and disagreement requires some individual thought and consideration.

[rob19]

One of the tenets of the BSA is to be morally straight. Having gays anywhere near a scout troop violates their rules.

I'm curious as to what about being gay is immoral in your opinion.

[rob19]

This reminds me, SouthPark did an episode about this


To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Spesh]

Hilariously, one of the tenets of the BSA is tolerance regardless of ethnicity and generation. You know, tolerance for everyone except those damned America hating gays!

With all the poor things this administration has done, one would think people would have enough ammo for criticism instead of resorting to conspiracy theories. Instead, people(read: celebrities) are upset that Obama might actually be in favor of teaching children that gays are worthy of tolerance. QUICKLY, IMPEACH OBAMA BEFORE ITS TO LATE!

[LANGER72]

Ah, the child predators are gay schtick. Good old hate. What will happen when gay-bashing goes the way of racial slurs? Who will we turn our hatred on then? Let me add that to the other "blah blahs." Blah blah blah liberals blah blah blah gay=child predator blah blah blah lefties...

Saying we disagree isn't entirely accurate. Some of us are forming individual views and capable of individual thought vs others who are just spouting the party talking points. IMO, agreement and disagreement requires some individual thought and consideration.

Sorry to annoy you with sensible discussion.

The likelihood of Obama being involved in a way the Norris describes stands. Cookie monsters have no business around young men. End of conversation.



Blah, blah ,blah...

[tylerdolphin]

Cookie monsters have no business around young men. End of conversation.



Blah, blah ,blah...

Totally. Cant let them catch the gay.

[LANGER72]

I'm curious as to what about being gay is immoral in your opinion.

Morally straight means that gay activity is not allowed. There is nothing stopping the gay community from creating their own version of scouts.

[rob19]

Morally straight means that gay activity is not allowed. There is nothing stopping the gay community from creating their own version of scouts.

That's semantics. "Straight" just so happens to be slang for heterosexual, what you're implying is that homosexuality is immoral, am I correct?