To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Havent played Madden in a few years myself... but I know some of you on here are big into it, so thought I should share.
Madden 2013 Team Ratings
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Havent played Madden in a few years myself... but I know some of you on here are big into it, so thought I should share.
My FinHeaven Logo / Rebranding Contest Entry:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Check it out full sized at:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Ouch 68 really.
at least there's no super 94.
We can only go up..
Not too surprised, but how on earth are the cards that high? Fitzgerald is one of the best (if not THE best), but one player couldn't have bumped them that much.
Sent from my VS910 4G using Tapatalk 2
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Redskins at 78 wtf............
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Big Madden fan here.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by NyPhan23
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'm interested to see how Tanny will be rated. He has WR speed, agility and acceleration. But I think they will jip him out of all of the menitoned. Tanny should be a killer player in madden.
The 68 rating personally is a bit ridiculous. Not sure how the team went from a 76 to a 68 simply by losing Brandon Marshall? The defense alone should be high 80's.
As usual, EA sports has 0 clue how to properly rate teams and players.
Looking at next years roster, IMO (not being biased)
Wake, Long should be 95+
Starks, Soliai, Carpenter, Fields90+
Bush, Vontae, Dansby, Odrick, Pouncey 85+
Incog, Bess, D. Thomas, Burnett, 80+
Moore, Garrard, S. Smith, R. Marshall, R. Jones, Clemons, Misi, Ocho Cinco, Hartline, J. Martin, C. Clay, J. Jerry, Nicks, Fasano 75+
T. Hill, J Wilson, S. Slaton, L. Miller, Egnew, Gates, 70+
Not sure how this team pans out to a overall 68. I'd give the team a overall 75
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Only 2 teams worse according to these ratings Cleveland and Indy. Superbowl champs in fifth. Ne on top.
The Game developer is from boston.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Will this be the year the dolphins make the playoffs?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
What is in your water?
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
68 is probably a little low, but it is hard to argue. Tannehill will probably have decent speed, and such but not on the level of others like Cam, or RGIII.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by MRojas4
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
But you are definitely overrating a lot of our players..
Wake, Long - yes
Starks, Carpenter and Fields are maybe deserving of 90s or high 80's.
Why would Daniel Thomas be 80+? Gates 70+? He caught like 2 passes? I doubt Jimmy Wilson gets that much of a buff either. Rookies often don't get rated very high for mid round picks either so above 70 would be great if they really were.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Those ratings are way too high.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by MRojas4
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sent from my VS910 4G using Tapatalk 2
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks