Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

[irish fin fan]

With all due respect your reasoning above is total nonsense. You believing God doesn’t exist in no way means that He magically no longer exists and you magically no longer belong to Him. You’re like the child who pretends his Father doesn’t exist in order to avoid a spanking.



I am confident in my position, not arrogant. If God didn’t exist though why would someone being arrogant be a bad thing? You atheists love to borrow your morality from us Christians, the only problem is that the very God you claim doesn’t exist must exist in order for you to make any sense of the morality you borrowed from us.



It’s not up to you, it’s up to Him and He says we have all broken His laws. The creatures do not make up the rules, I am sorry.

No, your god is a figment of your imagination, nothing more, nothing less,

[phins_4_ever]

It’s not up to you, it’s up to Him and He says we have all broken His laws. The creatures do not make up the rules, I am sorry.

Yes, it is up to me. He only exists in the minds of the those who are incompetent to make their own decisions and lack responsibility for their actions in life. He is only your sugar daddy (without the sugar) not mine. He is an excuse for your failures.

[Statler Waldorf]

No, your god is a figment of your imagination, nothing more, nothing less,

No, your naturalism is a figment of your imagination, nothing more, nothing less.

Yes, it is up to me. He only exists in the minds of the those who are incompetent to make their own decisions and lack responsibility for their actions in life. He is only your sugar daddy (without the sugar) not mine. He is an excuse for your failures.

You just refuted your own position, again. If naturalism were true, as you espouse it is, a person would not have the ability to make any decisions because the mental process would be determined by the chemical processes in the brain which follow natural law. So by appealing to a person’s ability to make their own choices you are again borrowing from Christians. In order to argue against the Christian God’s existence you must presuppose that the Christian God exists, you lost the debate before it ever began.

[phins_4_ever]

In order to argue against the Christian God’s existence you must presuppose that the Christian God exists, you lost the debate before it ever began.

You are way out there. Far out. So I argue against the existence but have to believe first that he/she/it exists? Your mind is so clouded I feel very sorry for you.

Let me summarize this: you and I sit at dinner and you ask me how I like my fish. I tell you that I am eating steak. You are telling me "no you are eating a fish". So to debate with you that I am really eating a steak I first have acknowledge that my steak is indeed a fish in order to argue that I am eating steak and not fish?
This is so screwed up. I honestly have never heard that crap before. Go smoke a joint. You need it.

[Statler Waldorf]

You are way out there. Far out. So I argue against the existence but have to believe first that he/she/it exists? Your mind is so clouded I feel very sorry for you.

No, you’re not following what I am saying at all. You personally do not have to believe in the Christian God in order to argue against His existence, but in order to argue against Him you must presuppose truths that could only be possibly true IF the Christian God exists. It’s like someone arguing against logic, that person doesn’t have to believe in logic to argue against it, but they have to use arguments that presuppose the existence of logic in order to argue against it. So by being an anti-Christian, you are holding to a self-refuting position.

Let me summarize this: you and I sit at dinner and you ask me how I like my fish. I tell you that I am eating steak. You are telling me "no you are eating a fish". So to debate with you that I am really eating a steak I first have acknowledge that my steak is indeed a fish in order to argue that I am eating steak and not fish?

Nope, a better analogy would be, if we were having dinner and I asked you, “How is your brain?” And you responded, “My brain? My brain doesn’t exist.” And I responded, “No, your brain does exist because if you didn’t have a brain you wouldn’t even be able to argue that you didn’t have a brain because the act of arguing requires a person to have a brain in order to formulate ideas and arguments.” Make more sense?

This is so screwed up. I honestly have never heard that crap before. Go smoke a joint. You need it.

It’s unfortunate that this is the first time you have been exposed to the more sophisticated and eloquent side of Christian apologetics.

[phins_4_ever]

No, you’re not following what I am saying at all. You personally do not have to believe in the Christian God in order to argue against His existence, but in order to argue against Him you must presuppose truths that could only be possibly true IF the Christian God exists. It’s like someone arguing against logic, that person doesn’t have to believe in logic to argue against it, but they have to use arguments that presuppose the existence of logic in order to argue against it. So by being an anti-Christian, you are holding to a self-refuting position.



Nope, a better analogy would be, if we were having dinner and I asked you, “How is your brain?” And you responded, “My brain? My brain doesn’t exist.” And I responded, “No, your brain does exist because if you didn’t have a brain you wouldn’t even be able to argue that you didn’t have a brain because the act of arguing requires a person to have a brain in order to formulate ideas and arguments.” Make more sense?


It’s unfortunate that this is the first time you have been exposed to the more sophisticated and eloquent side of Christian apologetics.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

There is nothing sophisticated or eloquent about you nor your argumentation. You just have a twisted mind.
As a matter of fact you are an embarrassment to the Christian community.


To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[Statler Waldorf]

There is nothing sophisticated or eloquent about you nor your argumentation. You just have a twisted mind.
As a matter of fact you are an embarrassment to the Christian community.

So rather than trying to refute the argument you resort to personally attacking me? Figures. Until you can postulate a manner in which you can account for the preconditions of argumentation consistently with your atheism you’ll always be holding to a self-refuting position. The God of Scripture lives, you’re hopeless irrationality is proof of that.

[phins_4_ever]

So rather than trying to refute the argument you resort to personally attacking me? Figures. Until you can postulate a manner in which you can account for the preconditions of argumentation consistently with your atheism you’ll always be holding to a self-refuting position. The God of Scripture lives, you’re hopeless irrationality is proof of that.

What is there to refute? There is no way a sane person can refute or debate with insane people. Just your statement that in order to deny god's existence I have to first presuppose his existence is not an argument for sane people. Why argue a point if I have to presuppose the opposite.

You are presenting trap arguments or you are trying to turn debates into traps. Your requirement to presuppose the existence of god before I can argue that he does not exist is a completely wrong use of a presupposition.

Let's make it easier for the insane. My opinion is that God does not exist, nor has he ever existed, nor will he ever exist. Now you can plaster your version of 'presuppose' where the sun does not shine (presupposition: The sun shines).

[irish fin fan]

So rather than trying to refute the argument you resort to personally attacking me? Figures. Until you can postulate a manner in which you can account for the preconditions of argumentation consistently with your atheism you’ll always be holding to a self-refuting position. The God of Scripture lives, you’re hopeless irrationality is proof of that.

All your so called logic is based, in your mind, that a god exists. Sorry, the universe exists and it exists without a God. Sorry to burst your bubble. But you keep making up whatever bull**** logic to keep your fantasy's moving along.

[phins_4_ever]

All your so called logic is based, in your mind, that a god exists. Sorry, the universe exists and it exists without a God. Sorry to burst your bubble. But you keep making up whatever bull**** logic to keep your fantasy's moving along.

Hey now.
First you have to presuppose that the Universe exist with a God or because of a God before you make the argument that the Universe exists without a God.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Basically refute your own position before you are trying to prove your position.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.