Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: What Dolphin players are worth drafting?

  1. -1
    Boy From School's Avatar
    Noobie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2010
    Posts:
    723
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Surprise, Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks

    What Dolphin players are worth drafting?

    I planning on joining ESPN fantasy.

    I was thinking of drafting Reggie Bush, Daniel Thomas and Anthony Fasano as bench players. What about Tannehill? Do
    you think they could contribute to my team or should I just look at other players.

  2. -2
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,369
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Reggie Bush mid-round and maybe Carpenter in the last round. Bess and Fasano as a backup TE in deeper leagues.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.






  3. -3
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Bush and Tannehill. Take bush early and tannenhill really late. Bush will contribute alot for you and tannehill is your bench sleeper, could be a steal if he turns out to be our franchise qb. Taking tannenhill late does not hurt you if he doesnt contribute this year, he is a bench player for you and a draft pick that does not matter. With bush you know what you are getting. If used correctly he will be our darren sproles of New orleans. I'd stay away from fasano and daniel thomas though, thomas wont get much carries and fasano is not reliable.

  4. -4
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,369
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MarshallFin1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Bush and Tannehill. Take bush early and tannenhill really late. Bush will contribute alot for you and tannehill is your bench sleeper, could be a steal if he turns out to be our franchise qb. Taking tannenhill late does not hurt you if he doesnt contribute this year, he is a bench player for you and a draft pick that does not matter. With bush you know what you are getting. If used correctly he will be our darren sproles of New orleans. I'd stay away from fasano and daniel thomas though, thomas wont get much carries and fasano is not reliable.
    I'd take Luck or Wilson as the sleeper rookies. They have more weapons to work with at this point, and with that D in Indy, they'll have to rely on him a lot more than we will with Tannehill.

  5. -5
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Gonzo
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I'd take Luck or Wilson as the sleeper rookies. They have more weapons to work with at this point, and with that D in Indy, they'll have to rely on him a lot more than we will with Tannehill.
    luck is not a sleeper pick because you have to use an early draft pick to get him. Wilson yea but tannenhill is a better option than him.

  6. -6
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,369
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MarshallFin1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    luck is not a sleeper pick because you have to use an early draft pick to get him. Wilson yea but tannenhill is a better option than him.
    Somebody drafted him early in your league? Lucky you!

    No offense, but I think that opinion is more from your heart than your head. Wilson has a good running game and good receivers and a better TE at the moment. Tannehill may end up being the better QB in real life, but in fantasy football, Wilson is hands down the better pickup right now.

  7. -7
    Waterlogged

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    3,176
    vCash:
    501
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Gonzo
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Somebody drafted him early in your league? Lucky you!

    No offense, but I think that opinion is more from your heart than your head. Wilson has a good running game and good receivers and a better TE at the moment. Tannehill may end up being the better QB in real life, but in fantasy football, Wilson is hands down the better pickup right now.
    thats your opinion, not that early but yea you have to use a mid-round pick to get him. He was the 1st overall pick of the draft what u expect? we will agree to disagree. tanny >> wilson imo.

  8. -8
    JCane's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2008
    Posts:
    15,321
    vCash:
    1934488
    Loc:
    Lauderville, Florilina
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Dan Carpenter.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  9. -9
    Gonzo's Avatar
    Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    17,369
    vCash:
    9600
    Loc:
    Brooklyn
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by MarshallFin1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    thats your opinion, not that early but yea you have to use a mid-round pick to get him. He was the 1st overall pick of the draft what u expect? we will agree to disagree. tanny >> wilson imo.
    Fantasy-wise this year? I just don't see it. I think Tannehill can have a solid year in real life, but we're not talking real life. Hell, the only leagues I'm in that had Tannehill drafted were ones made up of Phins fans (as a backup bench rider of course). Just my opinion, but I take Wilson over Tannehill in fantasy at this point by a good margin. Again, that's more of a statement of his available weapons vs. Tannehill's than it is a statement of their ability as QBs.

  10. -10
    Dolfan3773's Avatar
    Bleeding 305 since 1987

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    May 2006
    Posts:
    6,205
    vCash:
    501
    Loc:
    Miami
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I'm in a 16 team league and I drafted Tannehill with my last pick as my backup QB

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •