The real Sanchez is back today

[nyjunc]

Right now Tannehill is playing better than Sanchez with a group of receivers that I am sure you would rank below the Jets.

There is a difference between continuing to do your job well under more difficult circumstances but still not pulling out victories and having the quality of your play tank. Sanchez is tanking. He is making poor reads and poor throws. He is not playing well.

Tannehill has had basically 1 good game na dit came in a loss where he threw the INT to lose it. Let's not get crazy here, neither of our WR corps are great but ours is beat up too and we don't have a ground game which you guys have.

[FinfanInBuffalo]

Tannehill has had basically 1 good game na dit came in a loss where he threw the INT to lose it. Let's not get crazy here, neither of our WR corps are great but ours is beat up too and we don't have a ground game which you guys have.

Tannehill played well yesterday also. His best two games were when the running game has sputtered. The INT against the Cards is not on him. He has played well enough for the team to be 4-1. He is a rookie on a team that is still short of play makers on offense.

Tannehill's performance while getting blitzed this year is outstanding. That alone sets him way above Sanchez.

The Jets will be drafting another QB next year.

[nyjunc]

Tannehill played well yesterday also. His best two games were when the running game has sputtered. The INT against the Cards is not on him. He has played well enough for the team to be 4-1. He is a rookie on a team that is still short of play makers on offense.

Tannehill's performance while getting blitzed this year is outstanding. That alone sets him way above Sanchez.

The Jets will be drafting another QB next year.

he failed once again late in a game, the #s are nice but if you continue to fail in crucial, late game spots you won't win a lot of games. He and the O gave Cincy multiple chances to come back.

he hasn't played well enough for the team to be 4-1, he was pretty bad against us but I know you blame the kicker even though he set up a near 50 yard attempt. The D carried them yesterday and you benfitted from a big missed FG. The oak game the run game carried you, he's played well enough to be 2-3 which is where Miami is.

[FinfanInBuffalo]

he failed once again late in a game, the #s are nice but if you continue to fail in crucial, late game spots you won't win a lot of games. He and the O gave Cincy multiple chances to come back.

he hasn't played well enough for the team to be 4-1, he was pretty bad against us but I know you blame the kicker even though he set up a near 50 yard attempt. The D carried them yesterday and you benfitted from a big missed FG. The oak game the run game carried you, he's played well enough to be 2-3 which is where Miami is.

Interesting how you see things differently when it is not Sanchez being talked about.....

BTW, get the tissues ready. This may be Sanchez's last start as a Jet.

[registeredguy]

The Real Tebow will be on display tonight when Mark Sanchez gets BENCHED while the Jets get prison raped by a good football team.

[MadDog 88]

Tannehill has had basically 1 good game na dit came in a loss where he threw the INT to lose it. Let's not get crazy here, neither of our WR corps are great but ours is beat up too and we don't have a ground game which you guys have.

Brian Hartline is at the top in yards because of Ryan Tannehill. Mark Sanchez cant do that because he doesn't make those around him better.

[nyjunc]

Brian Hartline is at the top in yards because of Ryan Tannehill. Mark Sanchez cant do that because he doesn't make those around him better.

b/c Tannhehill threw to a wide open Hartline and Hartline, like Hennehill, had one good that means Hennehill is making Hartline better? why couldn't he get closer than an almost 50 yd FG against us? why did he threw away the game in Ari? why couldn't he close out the game yesterday?

[Vaark]

"Tannehill" hahaha.. The irony is that Henne would be starting on the jest right now, Especially funny coming from the guy who slurps Grossman-lite (wthout the legitimacy of making a SB).
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Like I always said, they're still delusional homers, but since everything is relative, JI is probably the most objective jest board:
​
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[FinfanInBuffalo]

b/c Tannhehill threw to a wide open Hartline and Hartline, like Hennehill, had one good that means Hennehill is making Hartline better? why couldn't he get closer than an almost 50 yd FG against us? why did he threw away the game in Ari? why couldn't he close out the game yesterday?

The jealousy is just dripping from this post. Just too funny. You've been reminded what a pro QB is supposed to look like and it is killing you. Now your torn between being horribly wrong about Sanchez for 4 years and having to put up with crappy QB play for any longer. Ha, ha ,ha.

[nyjunc]

"Tannehill" hahaha.. The irony is that Henne would be starting on the jest right now, Especially funny coming from the guy who slurps Grossman-lite (wthout the legitimacy of making a SB).
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Like I always said, they're still delusional homers, but since everything is relative, JI is probably the most objective jest board:
​

I said "Hennehill" not "Tannehill"
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.