Oh YEA! ITS ON!

[WVDolphan]

Romney about to bust that ass again tonight!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!1

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

Romney about to bust that ass again tonight!!! WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!1

cant wait to see obama look clueless again without his teleprompter

[Statler Waldorf]

cant wait to see obama look clueless again without his teleprompter

What's the over/under on the number of "uh"s tonight by Obama?

[JackFinfan]

I disagree, with three parties the Democratic Party wouldn’t have to work as hard; they’d be able to win with only 35 percent of the vote because the Republican Party would be fragmented. This would lead to more extreme left-wing candidates winning major office.

3rd party candidates appeal to both democrats and republicans. Remember, Ralph Nader was blamed for Gore losing. Libertarians appeal to both R's and D's. R's when it comes to the fiscal policies and D's in regards to social policies.

[Ilovemyfins4eva]

What's the over/under on the number of "uh"s tonight by Obama?

8 and a half, or is that being too conservative?

[Statler Waldorf]

Libertarians appeal to both R's and D's. R's when it comes to the fiscal policies and D's in regards to social policies.

I disagree Jack, libertarians are generally small government, against government health care, support the 2^nd Amendment, and generally line up far more with Republicans, that’s why they are always in the Republican primary. If there was a 3^rd party that actually split the other two parties evenly I’d be all for it, but there just isn’t one.

---------- Post added at 03:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:47 PM ----------

8 and a half, or is that being too conservative?

Haha, I bet he hits that in the 1st response.

[JackFinfan]

I disagree Jack, libertarians are generally small government, against government health care, support the 2^nd Amendment, and generally line up far more with Republicans, that’s why they are always in the Republican primary. If there was a 3^rd party that actually split the other two parties evenly I’d be all for it, but there just isn’t one.

True, but like I said they lean left on social issues. They're pro gay marriage and pro legalization. Almost all of my left leaning friends would have voted for Ron Paul instead of Obama if he'd have won the primary. I agree that it won't split evenly, but the parties would adapt themselves. I don't think it would sway parties to the left or right, but we can agree to disagree on that.

[Statler Waldorf]

True, but like I said they lean left on social issues. They're pro gay marriage and pro legalization. Almost all of my left leaning friends would have voted for Ron Paul instead of Obama if he'd have won the primary. I agree that it won't split evenly, but the parties would adapt themselves. I don't think it would sway parties to the left or right, but we can agree to disagree on that.

They’re pro-gay marriage? I didn’t know that, I figured most libertarians would just prefer the Government got out of the marriage business altogether. I’d probably support that position, I am sick of the whole marriage debate.

[JackFinfan]

They’re pro-gay marriage? I didn’t know that, I figured most libertarians would just prefer the Government got out of the marriage business altogether. I’d probably support that position, I am sick of the whole marriage debate.

They're pro you can do what you want as long as it doesn't hurt other members of society. Gay marriage doesn't affect anyone but the individuals getting married, thus they are pro-gay marriage. Specifically, they would like all marriages to be managed by churches and other non gov't organizations and the goverments role would be to provide everyone with some type of union certficate (whether it's a straight or gay marriage). So, really we are both right.

[Statler Waldorf]

They're pro you can do what you want as long as it doesn't hurt other members of society. Gay marriage doesn't affect anyone but the individuals getting married, thus they are pro-gay marriage. Specifically, they would like all marriages to be managed by churches and other non gov't organizations and the goverments role would be to provide everyone with some type of union certficate (whether it's a straight or gay marriage). So, really we are both right.

I can handle both of us being right :-)