We want more Moore, Tannehill can learn how to be a NFL QB from the bench

[dolphans1]

I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

d-1

[Tiko377]

Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.

Tannehill is 4-4 he started last game
Moore is 0-0

[beanh8er]

I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

d-1

There is no quarterback controversy. What ****ing planet are you living on where there is a QB controversy?

[uk_dolfan]

pathetic

I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

d-1

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

[FinsFanforlife1]

Really your putting this in tannehill???? Some people are morons. Did you even see the game?

[JERSEYFINFAN23]

need too change the red color on the back round very hard too read the post -
Moore is a journeyman back up -- he is gone at seasons end =

[DannyBoy13]

Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.

congratulations you officially have **** for brains.

[LennyV]

Moore is 1-0 Tannehill is 3-4 and simply does not have the experience or the skill to win the close games.

**** off

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

I felt Moore and really that Pat Devlin should have been the starter, but by that unwritten rule, I felt Moore earned the job last year, so he should have been the starter by default.

I just don't understand how we draft a rookie wide/receiver QB and somehow pressure him to be our savior and learn on the job.

I was satisfied Moore's performance last year.

Had Moore started and we lost, then I feel it promotes Tannehills success.

If we win, well we want to make sure Tannehill gets well.

In other words, the Dolphins had every excuse to start Moore and save face.

Now we have a QB controversy as someone predicted earlier in week.

d-1

If you seriously think there is a QB controversy, your on cloud 9. Tannehill was drafted and given the keys to the car. Period.

Now, why would MIA start Tannehill year 1? Because since 2008, if you are drafted in the first round as a QB...YOU START. Period. Teams no longer have the luxury to sit and wait. MIA and the new HC staff knew they were hitched to Tannehill. You find out in 2012 what you have, not in 2014. You let your QB learn on the job. Not on the bench.

[dolphans1]

Go watch the Jets game again and you may understand where I am coming from.

We had several opportunities to put this game away today and Tannehills couldn't do it.

I feel Matt Moore gives us the best chance to win, but you know, it doesn't really matter anyway.

I fell into the trap in thinking we could make the playoffs and what I saw today is not a playoff team.

My instincts tell me Tannehill is not the answer as a franchise QB.

I hope I'm wrong, but time will only tell.

Too many horrible throws by Tannehill when we really needed it.

d-1

There is no quarterback controversy. What ****ing planet are you living on where there is a QB controversy?