Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)

  1. -1
    Rhoadsy13's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    306
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Birmingham, AL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Player Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    Good article. He looks at the game film & analyzed it & he doesn't think he played as bad as his numbers looked. I'm a big believer in Tannehill & although he didn't play great it's part of the game & he will get better.
    I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. Phillipians 4:13

  2. -2
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    6,712
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks
    "He saw blitzes coming and went to his second read".

    Wasn't there a thread earlier this week that stated the Titans never blitzed once throughout the whole game? How did Ryan see them coming?

    Overall though good article.

  3. -3
    registeredguy's Avatar
    Joe Philbin: Sharp Dressed Man

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    6,570
    vCash:
    200
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by DolfanISS
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    "He saw blitzes coming and went to his second read".

    Wasn't there a thread earlier this week that stated the Titans never blitzed once throughout the whole game? How did Ryan see them coming?

    Overall though good article.
    No, they did blitz a few times. Just not very much.
    Me say come, Mister Fisher man, show me da contract
    Daylight come and Jake Long go home

    An' it's six mil, seven mil, eight mil bunch
    Daylight come and Jake Long go home

  4. -4
    enigmatics's Avatar
    Go get me a juice box!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    5,565
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by registeredguy
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    No, they did blitz a few times. Just not very much.
    They blitzed only 10 times in 40 pass attempts.

  5. -5
    registeredguy's Avatar
    Joe Philbin: Sharp Dressed Man

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2011
    Posts:
    6,570
    vCash:
    200
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by enigmatics
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    They blitzed only 10 times in 40 pass attempts.
    Correct. It might have seemed like more, but only because the offensive line was playing like jello.

  6. -6
    SR 7's Avatar
    Hall Of Famer

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2006
    Posts:
    8,715
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    they didn't blitz becasue they knew if they gave tannehill time with more coverage those WR would not be able to break free and it would end up in forced throws.

    If i know a team has 2 recievers with 1 useless TE i'd keep everone in coverage and wait until the QB forces things. Not sure hwy it took teams 8 games to figure that one out but hey, it also took teams 17 games to figure out how easy it was to defend pennington, just defend the middle and make him go outside wiht his lack of arm strength.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    Next Miami Front Office = Anyone with Balls and Brains.
    **** MORONOO, ****LAND, and RO$$!!

    "Joe Montana was a product of a system, Dan Marino was a system." -- Bill Walsh



    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    twitter @EdwinT_FS

  7. -7
    enigmatics's Avatar
    Go get me a juice box!

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2004
    Posts:
    5,565
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by SR 7
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    they didn't blitz becasue they knew if they gave tannehill time with more coverage those WR would not be able to break free and it would end up in forced throws.
    How do you know it's not also partially that Tanny can't yet beat the kind of coverage they thru at him?

  8. -8
    Despacio's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jun 2004
    Posts:
    2,788
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Arizona
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Rosenthal:Tannehill wasn't great..But he was far from Miami biggest problem(positive)

    Asking a lot of a rookie to throw to a WR corp that can't get open. How we didn't upgrade in the offseason is mind boggling. All on Ireland here.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    When opportunity presents itself, grab it!

  9. -9
    chrispepper's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2010
    Posts:
    497
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I dont mind positivity but Ryan cost us this game.. More than half their points came off turnovers, you take them away and were definitley still in the game. I don't remember the titans doing too much on offence either so cant be too critical of the defence.. we execute better and we win that game.

  10. -10
    FishAttack

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    28
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    you did not read the article or?
    i got the feeling that most of the posters here should watch the CFL,no clue at all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •