Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 8 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 102

Thread: Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!

  1. -71
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    981
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Dolph N.Fan
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Tannehill has regressed because the offense around him is regressing. Think about it. Jake Long is getting worse by the week. You can tell Tannehill feels a lot more uncomfortable in the pocket the last few weeks than when he was in early October. Long is going to get Tannehill killed. Martin is regressing, he's starting to get beat a lot as well. Incognito and all his boneheaded penalties is killing the offense's momentum, pushing Miami back, putting Tannehill in 3rd and longs. Reggie Bush has obviously regressed as well... fumbling, dancing, giving himself up easily instead of running over defenders, just ineffective out there. Hartline, again regressing. Missing in action most of the time, pushing off or fumbling. I mean if the offense is crumbling around you, it's hard to expect Tannehill to continue play great. Against Tennessee and Buffalo, Tannehill seemed to be trying to do too much and was forcing passes cause I guess he saw no one else on offense was doing anything to make a play. Offensive line has got to get better...I think that happens by getting rid of Long next season.
    You have made some good points. But if these points you are making are to vindicate Tannehill, they won't work.

  2. -72
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2010
    Posts:
    671
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    New York
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phinking
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You have made some good points. But if these points you are making are to vindicate Tannehill, they won't work.
    He doesnt need to vindicate the Rookie just pointing out the obvious.

  3. -73
    ahmilli's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2008
    Posts:
    343
    vCash:
    20500
    Loc:
    Florida
    Thanks / No Thanks
    You do know he is a rookie right? And we are a helluva lot better than last year! Not many high draft pick rookie QBs go to the playoffs... Im done....

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  4. -74
    finjim's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,397
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Odessa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by ahmilli
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You do know he is a rookie right? And we are a helluva lot better than last year! Not many high draft pick rookie QBs go to the playoffs... Im done....
    Come join VIP, it's worth it!

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  5. -75
    mrbunglez's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    1,340
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by finjim
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Come join VIP, it's worth it!
    I would but I'm broke.....

  6. -76
    finjim's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,397
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Odessa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks
    it's less than $20, send me your address, or do you have paypal? I will pay it for you!

  7. -77
    mrbunglez's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    1,340
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    West Palm Beach
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by finjim
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    it's less than $20, send me your address, or do you have paypal? I will pay it for you!
    That's alright bro, thanks for the offer though.

  8. -78
    finjim's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,397
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Odessa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by mrbunglez
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    That's alright bro, thanks for the offer though.
    No worries man!

  9. -79
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,179
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Dolph N.Fan
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Tannehill has regressed because the offense around him is regressing. Think about it. Jake Long is getting worse by the week. You can tell Tannehill feels a lot more uncomfortable in the pocket the last few weeks than when he was in early October. Long is going to get Tannehill killed. Martin is regressing, he's starting to get beat a lot as well. Incognito and all his boneheaded penalties is killing the offense's momentum, pushing Miami back, putting Tannehill in 3rd and longs. Reggie Bush has obviously regressed as well... fumbling, dancing, giving himself up easily instead of running over defenders, just ineffective out there. Hartline, again regressing. Missing in action most of the time, pushing off or fumbling. I mean if the offense is crumbling around you, it's hard to expect Tannehill to continue play great. Against Tennessee and Buffalo, Tannehill seemed to be trying to do too much and was forcing passes cause I guess he saw no one else on offense was doing anything to make a play. Offensive line has got to get better...I think that happens by getting rid of Long next season.
    best post including my own so far...

  10. -80
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    1,996
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by 16phinsrfast
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    His oline regressed, horribly. That attributes to Miami's abysmal run game. Tannehill doesnt have near as enough time as he did from weeks 2-4. Its evident hes lost trust in his protections. Miami uses too much max pass protect in too many long down and distances. Less weapons for Tannehill to complete those, and with no run game you can load the box and drop 6 or more in coverage.
    A wide open receiver is a wide open receiver. Tannehill was not hit nor rushed on his missed throws to Bush or Clay. He just failed to deliver the ball to the correct spot on throws he has to make. What happened on previous plays does not matter. All of your statements have no bearing on those two throws. When he can make those throws consistently, then he has improved.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •