Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 102

Thread: Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!

  1. -31
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    6,726
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by ojmcduffy
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    it is also rediculous to lay all the blaim at tannehills feet. Ryan tannehill wasn't even on the field when our defense gave up repeated 3rd and longs to the colts offense. Tannehill wasn't on the feild when carpenter missed the field goals. Tannehill is not missing blocks and closing our running lanes. He done some stuff wrong and hes done some stuff right. Let the secenario play out. Alot of the problem with our fan base is unrealistic expectations coupled with knee jerk reactions. At some point dolfans need to learn to act instead of reacting.
    It's ridiculous and unfair, however it's a QB driven league nowadays and had Tannehill drove the team down the field and won a game we had no business winning it would have been HUGE and he would have gotten all the credit. I'm far from giving up on the kid but he needs to pull one of these things off no excuses.

  2. -32
    finomenal's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    1,700
    vCash:
    1200
    Loc:
    Fort Lauderdale, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!

    What's the moron count on here now? I lost count.
    Trophy #3 is coming in June.
    Follow me on Twitter @Ryan17Tannehill





    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


  3. -33
    DolfanISS's Avatar
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    6,726
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Bellingham, MA
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Biggest morons say 1 of 2 things.

    Tannehill is a franchise QB!

    Tannehill is a bust!

    Biggest morons are already on one of those sides. We should in in the middle.

  4. -34
    DDTDON's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2003
    Posts:
    1,161
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    I find it strange how the OP never came back to defend his post. Truly pathetic thread. If I could give threads a negative I would. We are building this team around RT and right now, he does not have the weapons he needs. TE and WR in the draft coming up. I expect next year to be better.

  5. -35
    rev kev's Avatar
    ihaveprettyfeet

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2007
    Posts:
    6,960
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Calgary Alberta
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by DDTDON
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I find it strange how the OP never came back to defend his post. Truly pathetic thread. If I could give threads a negative I would. We are building this team around RT and right now, he does not have the weapons he needs. TE and WR in the draft coming up. I expect next year to be better.
    Agreed -

    And maybe we should have stashed him like GB did Rodgers - and then we would have a "franchise" QB to gloat about for 3 years

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I don't need the credit. But I can tell you one thing: When it's said and done, they'll look back and say, 'Oh, man, this dude can coach his butt off.' And you know what? It's true.

    -- Rex R

  6. -36
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    2,010
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phinking
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Ryan Tannehill had not one but TWO chances to win this game in the last 4 mins and he FAILED. Enough said.
    While this is fair criticism, your statement is way too strong at this point in his career.

  7. -37
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2005
    Posts:
    2,010
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    Tannehill is not a winner, folks!!!


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phinking
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You are 100% correct. He is NOT a winner. 19 starts in College and 9 in the NFL and not one come from behind 4th Qtr victory to me is very telling. We can all talk about what we THINK he can do, but I am going by what he as done.
    He has been poor in the fourth quarter all year long. The Dolphins have lost every fourth quarter (outscored by the opponent) except the Buffalo game. This is the best the team has played in the fourth.

  8. -38
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2007
    Posts:
    1,585
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Too early to tell if he is going to be a consistent winner in the NFL. It would be nice to be winning more of these close games but I'm not too hung up on that. He definitely needs more weapons around him at WR and TE. What I see is a highly competitive young QB with an excellent temperament who should only get better with more experience. His performance as a rookie has way exceeded my expectations. The Dolphin fans who are writing him off seem unfair. The 12 or so seasons post Marino have delivered generally poor results because of the lack of a decent QB, (the Pennington season was an exception), to write off Tannehill after a few mediocre games is impatient.

  9. -39
    finjim's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2004
    Posts:
    3,399
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Odessa, FL
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  10. -40
    PhinzN703's Avatar
    I like your style Dude

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2004
    Posts:
    22,537
    vCash:
    550
    Loc:
    Springfield, VA
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phinking
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Ryan Tannehill had not one but TWO chances to win this game in the last 4 mins and he FAILED. Enough said.
    So cut him after 10 games b/c he's a loser and will never at any point in his career improve. Oh if only that happened to other QBs in the league.

    ---------- Post added at 07:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:31 PM ----------


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by rev kev
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Agreed -

    And maybe we should have stashed him like GB did Rodgers - and then we would have a "franchise" QB to gloat about for 3 years
    Easier said than done when Favre, a HOF QB, was starting over Rodgers.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •