Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: We need a bigtime Runningback

  1. -21
    CANDolphan's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2006
    Posts:
    2,773
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    We are blocking very poorly so it wont matter

  2. -22
    Hayden Fox's Avatar
    Who Can Make a Play?

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2009
    Posts:
    12,495
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If "my plan" as you put it is not put into place then Tannehill will fail as a qb...its funny the examples you use of Foster and Gore...neither was a high pick and not really considered a "can't miss" guy. Get more athletic on the perimeter and at guard. I betcha the current admin is lining up ThomaS and Miller to be the guys next year. Positions like wr de and cb is where it is at.

  3. -23
    dolphans1's Avatar
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2008
    Posts:
    1,041
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    If that is the answer, then the same argument could be made about the QB position.

    Teams are stacking the box, because they want Tannehill to throw.

    That's why we're coming up short in the running game.

    d-1



    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by BSQ
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    IMO we are NOT set at runningback. Bush is not the answer, neither is Thomas and Miller is unproven. A Q.B.s best friend is a running game and we don't have one. Before the Cowboys drafted Emmit Smith their o-line was not highly though of. Bring in Smith and suddenly the o-line is elite. We need a Doug Martin type of guy. With our first pick we go wide reciever or runningback. If there is a super stud reciever with our first pick grab him. Our next pick based on that scenario should be a kickass runningback. What runningback could we get in free agency? I don't care if we draft one or get one in free agency it's clear that if we are to build around Tannehill we must land an elite runningback. Give Tanny some weapons and he will be great! Playaction only works when the runner is feared and our group isn't scareing anybody. Our biggest need is reciever. After that bring in a killer runnigback. Suddenly our offense will be looking alot better.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. -24
    FinaticalFinfan's Avatar
    Finatical Finfan

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2008
    Posts:
    97
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    N.P.R. Fl
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by dolphans1
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    If that is the answer, then the same argument could be made about the QB position.

    Teams are stacking the box, because they want Tannehill to throw.

    That's why we're coming up short in the running game.

    d-1
    Lmao....they want RT to throw because he has no one to throw to. !! It really is so freaking obvious....if you don't have an agenda.

  5. -25
    PJack's Avatar
    CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    1,536
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CT
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Most recent SB winners were lower tier running teams. In fact the Giants were dead LAST. While it's necessary to be able to run, this is a passing league, and RB's can be found in later rounds. Also, I thought we "stole" Miller in the 4th. Give the guy a shot with Thomas. Besides, we can't run now because teams have no reason to respect our offense beyond 8-10 yards as we have no deep threat whether on the sidelines or in the seam. Throw in the fact that we are a zone blocking team with guys on the OL that have very little mobility (save Pouncey). Won't get into the fact that they can't pass block either, but it's too depressing to talk about.

    Bottom line is we need multiple game breaking threats at WR, TE and even slot (Bess is no threat). Besides CB, all top picks should be spent on friggen playmakers on O.

    Oh, and please Ross....PLEASE don't let Ireland make those picks. Guy couldn't find a playmaker if his life depended on it.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  6. -26
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    485
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Foster went undrafted, Gore was a 3rd rounder and the muscle hamster was a #1. We both want to see the team play better and a verticle threat has to happen first. I guess I'm just not sold on Thomas. I really like Miller but we've seen so little of him. Do we keep Bush and use him like New Orleans did? I just wish we could land a Doug Martin type guy.

  7. -27
    finfan54's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2002
    Posts:
    21,179
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    CRAPCHESTER
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Hayden Fox
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    If "my plan" as you put it is not put into place then Tannehill will fail as a qb...its funny the examples you use of Foster and Gore...neither was a high pick and not really considered a "can't miss" guy. Get more athletic on the perimeter and at guard. I betcha the current admin is lining up ThomaS and Miller to be the guys next year. Positions like wr de and cb is where it is at.
    I would agree with this but I also think a guy who could be had in 2nd or 3rd round if you can find a Ray Rice type that is what I am thinking. A compact thumper who can play all 3 downs would certainly upgrade the offense.

    Ultimately, If I could have a 6-3/6-4 WR with some speed and catchability and smarts and a big TE in Eifert, I think that takes a lot of pressure Off Tannehill. I like your thoughts on the G spot. Jerry isnt lighting it up and you always have to keep your Oline moving into the future.

    BIG WR
    Big TE
    Ray Rice type RB and you have a full deck IMO minus OL
    You could easily find that in this upcoming draft IMO with how we are situated.

  8. -28
    Buff's Avatar
    From a galaxy far far away....

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    1,325
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Sydney Australia
    Thanks / No Thanks
    As inconsistant as Marshall was, he opened up the running game. With a big time receiver who can get open & then stretch the field, then the running game will improve. Bush got over 1000 yards last year. ar with a genuine number 1 receiver, he could, or Miller, do that next yeear.
    I RESPECT EVERYONES POINT OF VIEW & OPINION....REGARDLESS OF HOW WRONG THEY ARE


  9. -29
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    485
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    On board with 54. A Ray Rice type would be awesome. I think he was a second round pick for the Ravens.

  10. -30
    rayfinkle5's Avatar
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    478
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Doug Martin is having a great year no doubt. That said, do any of you remember that prior to concerns about his shoulder Lamar Miller was considered the second best back in the draft behind Richardson and ahead of Martin. Lamar Miller is our answer. His learning curve has been slow and that has kept him off the field but once he learns the offense and his assignments I have little doubt in his ability to be a stud. Think Bush, only faster, more decisive and with 20 extra pounds.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •