Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 2345678910 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 97

Thread: Tannehill is our franchise Q.B.

  1. -61
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    484
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Nub, I think we've made our point. This Casas guy is either a Tanne hater( what about the interception that was negated by the questionable flag that the NFL backed up by fining the dude) or a Matt Moore groupie. No point in using logic he keeps saying the same thing. WV, i have mad respect for your vast knowledge but in my original post I gave credit to Bess, Hartline, Pouncey and Martin for being very good players. I saw Tanny at his worst against New England. His accuracy just wasn't that great. Maybe he was overcoached and too afraid too make a mistake. Maybe the wind messed with him because we've all seen him throw beautiful passes through very tight windows and very accurate deep balls. Maybe it was something NE was doing on defense or maybe it just wasn't his day. I like the kid very much as our guy going forward do you not want to build around RT?

  2. -62
    Nublar7's Avatar
    FinHeaven Administrator

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2003
    Posts:
    31,454
    vCash:
    2469400
    Loc:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Casas9425
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Picking off a struggling QB in the end zone is a major play in a game.
    But how do you know it ends the game? You are speculating. The fact is the interception never happened because of the rougher the passer and Tannehill led three scoring drives to win the game. There was no game changing interception. No Seahawks offensive momentum. No hypothetical Seahawks 4th quarter offensive points. Fact is Tannehill came up big in the Seattle game and had a praise worthy performance. Give it to him and don't come up with hypothetical negative situations that never happened.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  3. -63
    Phins117's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2011
    Posts:
    916
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Casas9425
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    So you actually think he played well against the Titans and Bills? He was also awful in the second half in Indianapolis.
    With the obvious over throws and forceful throws that led to interceptions YES, I do believe he played well for A FIRST YOUR NFL QB!! He did fine. Not great not amazing but he did fine. I have no problems with these errors or interceptions...they happen and they will happen for the next year or so. He needs to grow and learn and once he is given that time I will grow tired of these errors. But as of now he is our QB and I will embrace him and cheer for him even we he plays awful. Even in the Texan game I thought he played ok. He is a smart and very talented guy. He will be fine and ATM I feel he is progressing normally.

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  4. -64
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    2,427
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by BSQ
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Nub, I think we've made our point. This Casas guy is either a Tanne hater( what about the interception that was negated by the questionable flag that the NFL backed up by fining the dude) or a Matt Moore groupie. No point in using logic he keeps saying the same thing. WV, i have mad respect for your vast knowledge but in my original post I gave credit to Bess, Hartline, Pouncey and Martin for being very good players. I saw Tanny at his worst against New England. His accuracy just wasn't that great. Maybe he was overcoached and too afraid too make a mistake. Maybe the wind messed with him because we've all seen him throw beautiful passes through very tight windows and very accurate deep balls. Maybe it was something NE was doing on defense or maybe it just wasn't his day. I like the kid very much as our guy going forward do you not want to build around RT?
    I don't like Matt Moore at all. All I'm saying is I'm a bit concerned with tannehill but around here that's like saying you worship satan.

  5. -65
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    2,427
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Nublar7
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    But how do you know it ends the game? You are speculating. The fact is the interception never happened because of the rougher the passer and Tannehill led three scoring drives to win the game. There was no game changing interception. No Seahawks offensive momentum. No hypothetical Seahawks 4th quarter offensive points. Fact is Tannehill came up big in the Seattle game and had a praise worthy performance. Give it to him and don't come up with hypothetical negative situations that never happened.
    I believe Sherman would've gone into a shell with his play calling. Look, I just think its absolutely ridiculous to say that he's for sure our franchise QB, he's had some awful games. Maybe he'll get better but that's just speculation.

  6. -66
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    484
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Casas, we finally agree. I'm also a bit concerned but I have seen enough good in Tannehill that leads me to be happy that he is our guy. Do you want to build around him or are you saying we need to draft a different QB in tthe first round? Where do you stand on that question?

  7. -67
    Phins117's Avatar
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2011
    Posts:
    916
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Casas9425
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    I don't like Matt Moore at all. All I'm saying is I'm a bit concerned with tannehill but around here that's like saying you worship satan.
    Ok...not liking Matt Moore at all...
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You have failed me for the last time Casas. Id give you credit for most of your views but now...that is just plain silly. Matt Moore is a decent qb with a lot credit that has never been given to him. I highly respect him sitting behind RT even tho he deserved to start this year. And everything he did last year for us. Yes again he is not a franchise qb but you know what the guy made the second half of the season entertaining enough for me to watch the rest of the games...For shame on you. I shall reply no more to your silly posts and I will continue to lurk. MWHAHAHAHAHA

  8. -68
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    2,427
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by BSQ
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Casas, we finally agree. I'm also a bit concerned but I have seen enough good in Tannehill that leads me to be happy that he is our guy. Do you want to build around him or are you saying we need to draft a different QB in tthe first round? Where do you stand on that question?
    You absolutely continue to build around him, you also sign or trade for a veteran QB in case tannehill falls on his face. There is no way I'm drafting a QB next year if I'm the gm of this team...which I should be...

  9. -69
    Scout Team

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    484
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    You should be the GM???????????????????????????????????? I thought I was posting with a sane person. Oh well. Are you a closet Tebow fan?

  10. -70
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Mar 2006
    Posts:
    2,427
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Phins117
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Ok...not liking Matt Moore at all...
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    You have failed me for the last time Casas. Id give you credit for most of your views but now...that is just plain silly. Matt Moore is a decent qb with a lot credit that has never been given to him. I highly respect him sitting behind RT even tho he deserved to start this year. And everything he did last year for us. Yes again he is not a franchise qb but you know what the guy made the second half of the season entertaining enough for me to watch the rest of the games...For shame on you. I shall reply no more to your silly posts and I will continue to lurk. MWHAHAHAHAHA
    I like him as a backup.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •