Welcome to FinHeaven Fans Forums! We're glad to have you here. Please feel free to browse the forum. We'd like to invite you to join our community; doing so will enable you to view additional forums and post with our other members.



VIP Members don't see these ads.Join VIP Now
Page 6 of 13 FirstFirst ... 234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 129

Thread: Tannehill = Worst rookie QB of 2012?

  1. -51
    Fins_of_Fury's Avatar
    Hopeless Optimist

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Oct 2009
    Posts:
    487
    vCash:
    200
    Loc:
    Unforgiving Appalaichans
    Thanks / No Thanks
    eli overthrew a couple of sure td's last night, is he NOT elite anymore?

    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  2. -52
    Starter

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Sep 2009
    Posts:
    264
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Why was Tannehill drafted in the first place if he has only played x-amount of games during college and is the least experienced of the rookie QBs? That speaks volumes of Jeff Ireland's lack of talent evaluation. Why would anyone draft a "project" at the most critical spot on the team? Qb is the one spot that an "Acorn" will simply not do.

  3. -53
    Rookie

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jan 2012
    Posts:
    18
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    Ryan does seem to have the right attitude to be a franchise qb i will give you guys that much. Lets eee how he does next year.

  4. -54
    jtsacksyou's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Feb 2005
    Posts:
    1,061
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Ohio
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by Phinatic8u
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Josh Gordon is a stud. Supplemental draft too. Lucky Browns.
    This is what bothers me the most. We could have got Gordon in the supplemental and drafted Stephen Hill and we'd have one of the most promising groups of receivers. Could have addressed RT in FA. I think we need to get decent players for each position in FA and then focus our drafts on picking high potential guys hoping to find the stars in the draft. We've been looking for scrubs and depth in free agency then drafting for solid players in the draft. We need play makers.

  5. -55
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    979
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by iamtiv
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Is there one worse? I'm not projecting the future, just the present. It seems like even Weeden is a better player.

    RT did beat Seattle, then Wilson crushed the Bears on the road while RT stunk it up again.
    There were later-round picks who sit, but RT is the worst starting rookie QB.
    That kinda sucks.

    Damn, I hate being so snakebit. Tannehill is Exactly who he was predicted to be.
    Luck and RG3 are QBs of a generation and Tannehill is like David Woodley or, gulp, a young Alex Smith.
    Things just never work out for us. I mean, Matt Moore could already be better than Tannehill will ever be.

    At best, Tannehill will be an 'if' for another whole season. Johnny Football will probably be better, get drafted by the Jets, and kick our ass next year. Eagles QB Nick Foles might be better. Can U point to any QB and say with certainty "Tannehill is better than that guy"?

    I root for Miami but I only have loyalty to winning players. Tannehill is a multimillionaire, **** him if he doesn't play well. Earn your money!

    Frustrated fan. I'm trolling cuz I'm pissed and still pissed about that Buffalo game.
    The New England game was further evidence of this. There are a few Dolphin fans on here that are still in denial about Tannehill. But most football fans see what you and I see. No one who have seen Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III play will EVER put Tannehill in their class yet Tannehill is a TOP TEN Pick. The kid has issues with accuacy and unless you are blind, it is pretty obvious.

  6. -56
    Perennial All-Pro

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Jul 2010
    Posts:
    2,626
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by phinking
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    The New England game was further evidence of this. There are a few Dolphin fans on here that are still in denial about Tannehill. But most football fans see what you and I see. No one who have seen Andrew Luck and Robert Griffin III play will EVER put Tannehill in their class yet Tannehill is a TOP TEN Pick. The kid has issues with accuacy and unless you are blind, it is pretty obvious.
    So...what should we do draft another or two Qbs in next years draft?

  7. -57
    Twitches Brew's Avatar
    Pro Bowler

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Dec 2010
    Posts:
    1,127
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks
    HEY at least we aren't stuck with Mark Sanchez.

  8. -58
    j-off-her-doll's Avatar
    FinHeaven VIP

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Apr 2009
    Posts:
    6,731
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Dream Songs
    Thanks / No Thanks
    You're trolling because you didn't receive hugs as a child.

    ---------- Post added at 08:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:39 PM ----------


    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by jtsacksyou
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    This is what bothers me the most. We could have got Gordon in the supplemental and drafted Stephen Hill and we'd have one of the most promising groups of receivers. Could have addressed RT in FA. I think we need to get decent players for each position in FA and then focus our drafts on picking high potential guys hoping to find the stars in the draft. We've been looking for scrubs and depth in free agency then drafting for solid players in the draft. We need play makers.
    LMFAO. The Browns spent a 2nd. We would have had to spend a 1st. Seriously?

  9. -59
    LtDan's Avatar
    I am a Dan but not a Lt.

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2004
    Posts:
    7,412
    vCash:
    500
    Loc:
    Eglin AFB (Ft.Walton Beach Fl.)
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by iamtiv
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Is there one worse? I'm not projecting the future, just the present. It seems like even Weeden is a better player.

    RT did beat Seattle, then Wilson crushed the Bears on the road while RT stunk it up again.
    There were later-round picks who sit, but RT is the worst starting rookie QB.
    That kinda sucks.

    Damn, I hate being so snakebit. Tannehill is Exactly who he was predicted to be.
    Luck and RG3 are QBs of a generation and Tannehill is like David Woodley or, gulp, a young Alex Smith.
    Things just never work out for us. I mean, Matt Moore could already be better than Tannehill will ever be.

    At best, Tannehill will be an 'if' for another whole season. Johnny Football will probably be better, get drafted by the Jets, and kick our ass next year. Eagles QB Nick Foles might be better. Can U point to any QB and say with certainty "Tannehill is better than that guy"?

    I root for Miami but I only have loyalty to winning players. Tannehill is a multimillionaire, **** him if he doesn't play well. Earn your money!

    Frustrated fan. I'm trolling cuz I'm pissed and still pissed about that Buffalo game.
    yeah...let's jump off the bridge already...I mean really, go ahead dude...please

  10. -60
    Seasoned Veteran

    Status:
    Offline
    WPA:
    Join date:
    Aug 2005
    Posts:
    979
    vCash:
    500
    Thanks / No Thanks

    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    Originally Posted by ANUFan
    To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    So...what should we do draft another or two Qbs in next years draft?
    Not necessarily. Re-Sign Matt Moore and have a true OPEN competition next year between Tannehill, Moore and Devlin. If Tannehill wins it, good for him. But they must play the guy that gives this team the best chance to win. At this time i think Moore gives them the best chance but since the season is already lost, they have no choice now but to go with Tannehill.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •