No doubt in my mind we have at least two more wins, maybe three if Moore was our starter throughout. That would put us at 7-5 or 8-4 in a weak AFC. Im not saying we would be in the super bowl, but maybe a playoff appearance and a win is feasible. That may mean nothing to some of you, but considering our complete lack of achievment in recent history, meaningful games in late December into January would be nice for a change.
P.S. I like Tannehill. Just want to see what people think of this.
I think a better argument would be if the team would have kept more talent around such as Marshall and Davis could they be a little better.
Bottom line is we had threads last week saying RT was a franchise QB and this week he blows and will never be good.
He will have ups and downs. Some really bad downs. Next week could be really tough. Let's hope he finishes strong in the last three games.
Matt Moore? The guy who was struggling in the preseason against backups?
Not every human is a manipulative, opportunistic, letch... or at least that's what I'm told.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
No Moore sucked in preseason so that's that. Last year meant nothing the 2012 preseason while Moore was playing with backups meant everything. It's settled, close the thread.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by kmev827!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
I'd love to have Matt Moore as a backup next year..... But if there's going to be constant chimes after a loss for a QB change, I think it'd be best if he left the team to be honest.
I'm not saying Matt Moore is great, but we've lost some games bc Tanne missed wide open guys or made terrible mistakes. In other words, average qb play would have won us a few games. I think Moore proved in the Jets game that he can make routine plays when they're there.
Trading marshall away was beyond stupid. Ask bears fan if they give a f*** that marshalls a nutcase with their 8-4 record. Then were the first ones to complain we have no playmakers after applauding ireland and philbin for letting go of a top 3 reciever? So now the jury is out on tanne and makes things worst. Is it tanne, or is it the playmakers, is it both? Well never know if we dont have a true wr and we prolonged that by trading away marshall. Who knows if matt can replicate what he did last year without marshall, he is however more consistant than tanne
What color is the sky in your universe? There may be no doubt in your mind but there sure is in mine. Moore is less mobile than Tannehill and usually not as accurate. He has made as many "mistakes" as Tannehill has, even during his run last year.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by kmev827!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
For the record, Moore did NOT "light it up" the one time he played this season.
You're entitled to feel that way of course. I disagree myself.
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Originally Posted by kmev827!
To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks